AN EVALUATION OF USA UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FORECASTS IN TERMS OF ACCURACY AND BIAS. EMPIRICAL METHODS TO IMPROVE THE FORECASTS ACCURACY

The most accurate forecasts for USA unemployment rate on the horizon 2001-2012, according to U1 Theil’s coefficient and to multi-criteria ranking methods, were provided by International Monetary Fund (IMF), being followed by other institutions as: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Developme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: BRATU (SIMIONESCU) MIHAELA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academica Brâncuşi 2013-02-01
Series:Analele Universităţii Constantin Brâncuşi din Târgu Jiu : Seria Economie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2013-01/24_Bratu%20Mihaela.pdf
id doaj-6143297c96b746bbb2a8dfcca4939a42
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6143297c96b746bbb2a8dfcca4939a422020-11-24T23:18:37ZengAcademica BrâncuşiAnalele Universităţii Constantin Brâncuşi din Târgu Jiu : Seria Economie 1844-70072013-02-0111170180AN EVALUATION OF USA UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FORECASTS IN TERMS OF ACCURACY AND BIAS. EMPIRICAL METHODS TO IMPROVE THE FORECASTS ACCURACYBRATU (SIMIONESCU) MIHAELAThe most accurate forecasts for USA unemployment rate on the horizon 2001-2012, according to U1 Theil’s coefficient and to multi-criteria ranking methods, were provided by International Monetary Fund (IMF), being followed by other institutions as: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Blue Chips (BC). The multi-criteria ranking methods were applied to solve the divergence in assessing the accuracy, differences observed by computing five chosen measures of accuracy: U1 and U2 statistics of Theil, mean error, mean squared error, root mean squared error. Some strategies of improving the accuracy of the predictions provided by the four institutions, which are biased in all cases, excepting BC, were proposed. However, these methods did not generate unbiased forecasts. The predictions made by IMF and OECD for 2001-2012 can be improved by constructing combined forecasts, the INV approach and the scheme proposed by author providing the most accurate expections. The BC forecasts can be improved by smoothing the predictions using Holt-Winters method and Hodrick - Prescott filter. http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2013-01/24_Bratu%20Mihaela.pdfforecastspredictionsforecasts accuracycombined forecastsmulti-criteria ranking
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author BRATU (SIMIONESCU) MIHAELA
spellingShingle BRATU (SIMIONESCU) MIHAELA
AN EVALUATION OF USA UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FORECASTS IN TERMS OF ACCURACY AND BIAS. EMPIRICAL METHODS TO IMPROVE THE FORECASTS ACCURACY
Analele Universităţii Constantin Brâncuşi din Târgu Jiu : Seria Economie
forecasts
predictions
forecasts accuracy
combined forecasts
multi-criteria ranking
author_facet BRATU (SIMIONESCU) MIHAELA
author_sort BRATU (SIMIONESCU) MIHAELA
title AN EVALUATION OF USA UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FORECASTS IN TERMS OF ACCURACY AND BIAS. EMPIRICAL METHODS TO IMPROVE THE FORECASTS ACCURACY
title_short AN EVALUATION OF USA UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FORECASTS IN TERMS OF ACCURACY AND BIAS. EMPIRICAL METHODS TO IMPROVE THE FORECASTS ACCURACY
title_full AN EVALUATION OF USA UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FORECASTS IN TERMS OF ACCURACY AND BIAS. EMPIRICAL METHODS TO IMPROVE THE FORECASTS ACCURACY
title_fullStr AN EVALUATION OF USA UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FORECASTS IN TERMS OF ACCURACY AND BIAS. EMPIRICAL METHODS TO IMPROVE THE FORECASTS ACCURACY
title_full_unstemmed AN EVALUATION OF USA UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FORECASTS IN TERMS OF ACCURACY AND BIAS. EMPIRICAL METHODS TO IMPROVE THE FORECASTS ACCURACY
title_sort evaluation of usa unemployment rate forecasts in terms of accuracy and bias. empirical methods to improve the forecasts accuracy
publisher Academica Brâncuşi
series Analele Universităţii Constantin Brâncuşi din Târgu Jiu : Seria Economie
issn 1844-7007
publishDate 2013-02-01
description The most accurate forecasts for USA unemployment rate on the horizon 2001-2012, according to U1 Theil’s coefficient and to multi-criteria ranking methods, were provided by International Monetary Fund (IMF), being followed by other institutions as: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Blue Chips (BC). The multi-criteria ranking methods were applied to solve the divergence in assessing the accuracy, differences observed by computing five chosen measures of accuracy: U1 and U2 statistics of Theil, mean error, mean squared error, root mean squared error. Some strategies of improving the accuracy of the predictions provided by the four institutions, which are biased in all cases, excepting BC, were proposed. However, these methods did not generate unbiased forecasts. The predictions made by IMF and OECD for 2001-2012 can be improved by constructing combined forecasts, the INV approach and the scheme proposed by author providing the most accurate expections. The BC forecasts can be improved by smoothing the predictions using Holt-Winters method and Hodrick - Prescott filter.
topic forecasts
predictions
forecasts accuracy
combined forecasts
multi-criteria ranking
url http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2013-01/24_Bratu%20Mihaela.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bratusimionescumihaela anevaluationofusaunemploymentrateforecastsintermsofaccuracyandbiasempiricalmethodstoimprovetheforecastsaccuracy
AT bratusimionescumihaela evaluationofusaunemploymentrateforecastsintermsofaccuracyandbiasempiricalmethodstoimprovetheforecastsaccuracy
_version_ 1725580875000709120