Neuropsychological tests, MRI and SPECT in the evaluation of CNS involvement in SLE

Objective: To assess the agreement between presence and location of central nervous system (CNS) structural damage and neuropsychological performance. Methods: 21 unselected SLE patients underwent a 3 hours-long battery of neuropsychological tests sampling 15 cognitive functions. A neuropsychologist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Tomietto, V. Annese, S. D’Agostini, E. Gremese, E. Di Poi, G. Ferraccioli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2003-09-01
Series:Reumatismo
Online Access:https://reumatismo.org/index.php/reuma/article/view/126
id doaj-6143ab5ed87a46fb9304efb333586f49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6143ab5ed87a46fb9304efb333586f492020-11-24T23:55:57ZengPAGEPress PublicationsReumatismo0048-74492240-26832003-09-0155310.4081/reumatismo.2003.171Neuropsychological tests, MRI and SPECT in the evaluation of CNS involvement in SLEP. TomiettoV. AnneseS. D’AgostiniE. GremeseE. Di PoiG. FerraccioliObjective: To assess the agreement between presence and location of central nervous system (CNS) structural damage and neuropsychological performance. Methods: 21 unselected SLE patients underwent a 3 hours-long battery of neuropsychological tests sampling 15 cognitive functions. A neuropsychologist hypothesized for each SLE patient the most likely site of possible involvement, according to the neuropsychological performance. Patients underwent MRI scans within 6 months (3 months before or after) from neuropsychological tests and SPECT. Results: 14 of the 21 SLE patients (66,6%) were impaired in at least 1 function; among these, 7 patients (33,3%) were mildly impaired and 7 (33,3%) had more than 3 functions impaired. 10 patients (48%) had abnormal MRI scan. Negative and positive agreements between neuropsychological performance and MRI scan were detected in 15 patients (71%; χ2 with Yates’correction 6,09, p 0,007, measure K for concordance 0,44, p 0,03). All the 6 negative agreements had no records of major neurologic or psychiatric events; among the 9 positive agreements, 6 presented previous major neurologic events and 2 minor neuropsychiatric symptoms. Among the subjects with disagreement, 1 was unimpaired with positive MRI and without neuropsychiatric symptoms, 5 were mildly impaired with negative MRI. Conclusions: A detailed neuropsychological evaluation along with MRI arose as a valid method to esclude or to identify, localize and clinically interpret CNS involvement in SLE. Disagreement between MRI and neuropsychological tests was detected mainly for mild cognitive impairment that might be the expression of functional (inflammatory or ischemic) processes.https://reumatismo.org/index.php/reuma/article/view/126
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Tomietto
V. Annese
S. D’Agostini
E. Gremese
E. Di Poi
G. Ferraccioli
spellingShingle P. Tomietto
V. Annese
S. D’Agostini
E. Gremese
E. Di Poi
G. Ferraccioli
Neuropsychological tests, MRI and SPECT in the evaluation of CNS involvement in SLE
Reumatismo
author_facet P. Tomietto
V. Annese
S. D’Agostini
E. Gremese
E. Di Poi
G. Ferraccioli
author_sort P. Tomietto
title Neuropsychological tests, MRI and SPECT in the evaluation of CNS involvement in SLE
title_short Neuropsychological tests, MRI and SPECT in the evaluation of CNS involvement in SLE
title_full Neuropsychological tests, MRI and SPECT in the evaluation of CNS involvement in SLE
title_fullStr Neuropsychological tests, MRI and SPECT in the evaluation of CNS involvement in SLE
title_full_unstemmed Neuropsychological tests, MRI and SPECT in the evaluation of CNS involvement in SLE
title_sort neuropsychological tests, mri and spect in the evaluation of cns involvement in sle
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Reumatismo
issn 0048-7449
2240-2683
publishDate 2003-09-01
description Objective: To assess the agreement between presence and location of central nervous system (CNS) structural damage and neuropsychological performance. Methods: 21 unselected SLE patients underwent a 3 hours-long battery of neuropsychological tests sampling 15 cognitive functions. A neuropsychologist hypothesized for each SLE patient the most likely site of possible involvement, according to the neuropsychological performance. Patients underwent MRI scans within 6 months (3 months before or after) from neuropsychological tests and SPECT. Results: 14 of the 21 SLE patients (66,6%) were impaired in at least 1 function; among these, 7 patients (33,3%) were mildly impaired and 7 (33,3%) had more than 3 functions impaired. 10 patients (48%) had abnormal MRI scan. Negative and positive agreements between neuropsychological performance and MRI scan were detected in 15 patients (71%; χ2 with Yates’correction 6,09, p 0,007, measure K for concordance 0,44, p 0,03). All the 6 negative agreements had no records of major neurologic or psychiatric events; among the 9 positive agreements, 6 presented previous major neurologic events and 2 minor neuropsychiatric symptoms. Among the subjects with disagreement, 1 was unimpaired with positive MRI and without neuropsychiatric symptoms, 5 were mildly impaired with negative MRI. Conclusions: A detailed neuropsychological evaluation along with MRI arose as a valid method to esclude or to identify, localize and clinically interpret CNS involvement in SLE. Disagreement between MRI and neuropsychological tests was detected mainly for mild cognitive impairment that might be the expression of functional (inflammatory or ischemic) processes.
url https://reumatismo.org/index.php/reuma/article/view/126
work_keys_str_mv AT ptomietto neuropsychologicaltestsmriandspectintheevaluationofcnsinvolvementinsle
AT vannese neuropsychologicaltestsmriandspectintheevaluationofcnsinvolvementinsle
AT sdagostini neuropsychologicaltestsmriandspectintheevaluationofcnsinvolvementinsle
AT egremese neuropsychologicaltestsmriandspectintheevaluationofcnsinvolvementinsle
AT edipoi neuropsychologicaltestsmriandspectintheevaluationofcnsinvolvementinsle
AT gferraccioli neuropsychologicaltestsmriandspectintheevaluationofcnsinvolvementinsle
_version_ 1725460440069177344