Stepovers and Signal Detection: Response Sensitivity and Bias in the Differentiation of Genuine and Deceptive Football Actions
The ability to differentiate genuine and deceptive actions was examined using a combination of spatial and temporal occlusion to examine sensitivity to lower body, upper body, and full body sources of visual information. High-skilled and low-skilled association football players judged whether a play...
Main Authors: | Robin C. Jackson, Hayley Barton, Kelly J. Ashford, Bruce Abernethy |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02043/full |
Similar Items
-
The Perception of Deceptive Information Can Be Enhanced by Training That Removes Superficial Visual Information
by: Donghyun Ryu, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
How to Trick Your Opponent: A Review Article on Deceptive Actions in Interactive Sports
by: Iris Güldenpenning, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01) -
How humans impair automated deception detection performance
by: Bennett Kleinberg, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Detecting deception in second-language speakers
by: Da Silva, Cayla S.
Published: (2011) -
Second language bias and accuracy of deception judgments
by: Van Vuuren, Hermanus Hendrik Janse
Published: (2017)