The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies.

Animal models have shown that regional anesthesia (combined with or without general anesthesia) would attenuate the surgical stress response by preserving immune function and result in better long-term outcome. In order to test the hypothesis that cancer patients who had surgery with epidural anesth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wan-Kun Chen, Chang-Hong Miao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3577858?pdf=render
id doaj-61abd6d9b597444d8da89235fefbbc1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61abd6d9b597444d8da89235fefbbc1a2020-11-25T02:42:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0182e5654010.1371/journal.pone.0056540The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies.Wan-Kun ChenChang-Hong MiaoAnimal models have shown that regional anesthesia (combined with or without general anesthesia) would attenuate the surgical stress response by preserving immune function and result in better long-term outcome. In order to test the hypothesis that cancer patients who had surgery with epidural anesthesia (EA) would have better outcome (either overall survival [OS] or recurrence-free survival [RFS]) than those who were general anesthesia (GA), we performed this meta-analysis. By searching relevant literature, a total of 14 studies containing 18 sub-studies (seven in OS analysis and eleven in RFS analysis) were identified and meta-analyzed. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association. For OS, the random-effects model was used to analyze the data and demonstrated an OS benefit in favor of EA compared with GA alone (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, P = 0.013). The influence analysis showed the robustness of the results. Specifically, a significantly positive association between EA and improved OS was observed in colorectal cancer (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.99, P = 0.045). For RFS, the random-effects model was used to analyze the data and no significant relationship between RFS benefit and EA (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.64-1.22, P = 0.457) was detected. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that epidural anesthesia and/or analgesia might be associated with improved overall survival in patients with operable cancer undergoing surgery (especially in colorectal cancer), but it does not support an association between epidural anesthesia and cancer control. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether the association between epidural use and survival is causative.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3577858?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wan-Kun Chen
Chang-Hong Miao
spellingShingle Wan-Kun Chen
Chang-Hong Miao
The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Wan-Kun Chen
Chang-Hong Miao
author_sort Wan-Kun Chen
title The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies.
title_short The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies.
title_full The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies.
title_fullStr The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies.
title_full_unstemmed The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies.
title_sort effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Animal models have shown that regional anesthesia (combined with or without general anesthesia) would attenuate the surgical stress response by preserving immune function and result in better long-term outcome. In order to test the hypothesis that cancer patients who had surgery with epidural anesthesia (EA) would have better outcome (either overall survival [OS] or recurrence-free survival [RFS]) than those who were general anesthesia (GA), we performed this meta-analysis. By searching relevant literature, a total of 14 studies containing 18 sub-studies (seven in OS analysis and eleven in RFS analysis) were identified and meta-analyzed. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association. For OS, the random-effects model was used to analyze the data and demonstrated an OS benefit in favor of EA compared with GA alone (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, P = 0.013). The influence analysis showed the robustness of the results. Specifically, a significantly positive association between EA and improved OS was observed in colorectal cancer (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.99, P = 0.045). For RFS, the random-effects model was used to analyze the data and no significant relationship between RFS benefit and EA (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.64-1.22, P = 0.457) was detected. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that epidural anesthesia and/or analgesia might be associated with improved overall survival in patients with operable cancer undergoing surgery (especially in colorectal cancer), but it does not support an association between epidural anesthesia and cancer control. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether the association between epidural use and survival is causative.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3577858?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT wankunchen theeffectofanesthetictechniqueonsurvivalinhumancancersametaanalysisofretrospectiveandprospectivestudies
AT changhongmiao theeffectofanesthetictechniqueonsurvivalinhumancancersametaanalysisofretrospectiveandprospectivestudies
AT wankunchen effectofanesthetictechniqueonsurvivalinhumancancersametaanalysisofretrospectiveandprospectivestudies
AT changhongmiao effectofanesthetictechniqueonsurvivalinhumancancersametaanalysisofretrospectiveandprospectivestudies
_version_ 1724772542004068352