Tenecteplase Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke

One in five ischaemic strokes affects the posterior circulation. Basilar artery occlusion is a type of posterior circulation stroke associated with a high risk of disability and mortality. Despite its proven efficacy in ischaemic stroke more generally, alteplase only achieves rapid reperfusion in ~4...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fana Alemseged, Bruce C. V. Campbell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.678887/full
id doaj-61d44b46ba8f40adac2688d63ae4ffc3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61d44b46ba8f40adac2688d63ae4ffc32021-08-06T07:40:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952021-08-011210.3389/fneur.2021.678887678887Tenecteplase Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation StrokeFana AlemsegedBruce C. V. CampbellOne in five ischaemic strokes affects the posterior circulation. Basilar artery occlusion is a type of posterior circulation stroke associated with a high risk of disability and mortality. Despite its proven efficacy in ischaemic stroke more generally, alteplase only achieves rapid reperfusion in ~4% of basilar artery occlusion patients. Tenecteplase is a genetically modified variant of alteplase with greater fibrin specificity and longer half-life than alteplase, which can be administered by intravenous bolus. The single-bolus administration of tenecteplase vs. an hour-long alteplase infusion is a major practical advantage, particularly in “drip and ship” patients with basilar artery occlusion who are being transported between hospitals. Other practical advantages include its reduced cost compared to alteplase. The EXTEND-IA TNK trial demonstrated that tenecteplase led to higher reperfusion rates prior to endovascular therapy (22 vs. 10%, non-inferiority p = 0.002, superiority p = 0.03) and improved functional outcomes (ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale, common odds ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.0–2.8, p = 0.04) compared with alteplase in large-vessel occlusion ischaemic strokes. We recently demonstrated in observational data that tenecteplase was associated with increased reperfusion rates compared to alteplase prior to endovascular therapy in basilar artery occlusion [26% (n = 5/19) of patients thrombolysed with TNK vs. 7% (n = 6/91) thrombolysed with alteplase (RR 4.0 95% CI 1.3–12; p = 0.02)]. Although randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results, tenecteplase can be considered as an alternative to alteplase in patients with basilar artery occlusion, particularly in “drip and ship” patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.678887/fulltenecteplasebasilar artery occlusionalteplaseposterior circulation strokethrombolytic agent
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fana Alemseged
Bruce C. V. Campbell
spellingShingle Fana Alemseged
Bruce C. V. Campbell
Tenecteplase Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
Frontiers in Neurology
tenecteplase
basilar artery occlusion
alteplase
posterior circulation stroke
thrombolytic agent
author_facet Fana Alemseged
Bruce C. V. Campbell
author_sort Fana Alemseged
title Tenecteplase Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title_short Tenecteplase Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title_full Tenecteplase Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title_fullStr Tenecteplase Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Tenecteplase Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title_sort tenecteplase thrombolysis in posterior circulation stroke
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2021-08-01
description One in five ischaemic strokes affects the posterior circulation. Basilar artery occlusion is a type of posterior circulation stroke associated with a high risk of disability and mortality. Despite its proven efficacy in ischaemic stroke more generally, alteplase only achieves rapid reperfusion in ~4% of basilar artery occlusion patients. Tenecteplase is a genetically modified variant of alteplase with greater fibrin specificity and longer half-life than alteplase, which can be administered by intravenous bolus. The single-bolus administration of tenecteplase vs. an hour-long alteplase infusion is a major practical advantage, particularly in “drip and ship” patients with basilar artery occlusion who are being transported between hospitals. Other practical advantages include its reduced cost compared to alteplase. The EXTEND-IA TNK trial demonstrated that tenecteplase led to higher reperfusion rates prior to endovascular therapy (22 vs. 10%, non-inferiority p = 0.002, superiority p = 0.03) and improved functional outcomes (ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale, common odds ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.0–2.8, p = 0.04) compared with alteplase in large-vessel occlusion ischaemic strokes. We recently demonstrated in observational data that tenecteplase was associated with increased reperfusion rates compared to alteplase prior to endovascular therapy in basilar artery occlusion [26% (n = 5/19) of patients thrombolysed with TNK vs. 7% (n = 6/91) thrombolysed with alteplase (RR 4.0 95% CI 1.3–12; p = 0.02)]. Although randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results, tenecteplase can be considered as an alternative to alteplase in patients with basilar artery occlusion, particularly in “drip and ship” patients.
topic tenecteplase
basilar artery occlusion
alteplase
posterior circulation stroke
thrombolytic agent
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.678887/full
work_keys_str_mv AT fanaalemseged tenecteplasethrombolysisinposteriorcirculationstroke
AT brucecvcampbell tenecteplasethrombolysisinposteriorcirculationstroke
_version_ 1721219235057762304