Comparison of various risk scores for the prognosis of hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder

Abstract Background Various risk scores have been proposed that are useful for the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), which is an important disease in emergency medicine. Few studies have examined the usefulness of Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI) in this disease, which evaluates...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shinya Kita, Yasuyuki Shirai, Tomoharu Yoshida, Kei Shiraishi, Ayako Nakamura, Michitaka Kawano, Yoshihiro Kinoshita, Tatsuya Noguchi, Syunsuke Ito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12245-020-00293-x
id doaj-61e5cd5743f64e31a69a88843182c5fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-61e5cd5743f64e31a69a88843182c5fc2020-11-25T03:24:23ZengBMCInternational Journal of Emergency Medicine1865-13721865-13802020-07-011311710.1186/s12245-020-00293-xComparison of various risk scores for the prognosis of hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorderShinya Kita0Yasuyuki Shirai1Tomoharu Yoshida2Kei Shiraishi3Ayako Nakamura4Michitaka Kawano5Yoshihiro Kinoshita6Tatsuya Noguchi7Syunsuke Ito8Fujii HospitalKokura Memorial HospitalKokura Memorial HospitalShiraishi Gastrointestinal ClinicKokura Memorial HospitalKokura Memorial HospitalKokura Memorial HospitalSaitama Medical University International Medical CenterYamaguchi UniversityAbstract Background Various risk scores have been proposed that are useful for the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), which is an important disease in emergency medicine. Few studies have examined the usefulness of Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI) in this disease, which evaluates the patient’s general condition by scoring the patient’s underlying disease. There have been no studies investigating the efficacy of CCI compared to other risk scores in the management of UGIB requiring endoscopic hemostasis. Methods In addition to the Glasgow-Blatchford score, AIMS65 score, and Rockall score, we investigated the efficacy of the outcome prediction obtained by the original CCI and the updated CCI, scored only with respect to the underlying disease. We also examined the cutoff value when using the risk score. This retrospective study included 265 patients with hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions who underwent emergency endoscopic hemostasis during a 6-year period between 2011 and 2016 in our hospital. Results The updated CCI and AIMS65 score correlated with prognosis in multivariate analysis (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively). In clinical practice, the prognosis might be worse if both updated CCI and AIMS65 score were 3 point or more. Conclusion In addition to the AIMS65 score, the updated CCI can be a useful tool for managing upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder bleeding that requires endoscopic hemostasis.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12245-020-00293-xAIMS65 scoreCharlson Comorbidity IndexPrognosisUpper gastrointestinal bleedingUpper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shinya Kita
Yasuyuki Shirai
Tomoharu Yoshida
Kei Shiraishi
Ayako Nakamura
Michitaka Kawano
Yoshihiro Kinoshita
Tatsuya Noguchi
Syunsuke Ito
spellingShingle Shinya Kita
Yasuyuki Shirai
Tomoharu Yoshida
Kei Shiraishi
Ayako Nakamura
Michitaka Kawano
Yoshihiro Kinoshita
Tatsuya Noguchi
Syunsuke Ito
Comparison of various risk scores for the prognosis of hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
AIMS65 score
Charlson Comorbidity Index
Prognosis
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
author_facet Shinya Kita
Yasuyuki Shirai
Tomoharu Yoshida
Kei Shiraishi
Ayako Nakamura
Michitaka Kawano
Yoshihiro Kinoshita
Tatsuya Noguchi
Syunsuke Ito
author_sort Shinya Kita
title Comparison of various risk scores for the prognosis of hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
title_short Comparison of various risk scores for the prognosis of hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
title_full Comparison of various risk scores for the prognosis of hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
title_fullStr Comparison of various risk scores for the prognosis of hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of various risk scores for the prognosis of hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
title_sort comparison of various risk scores for the prognosis of hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
publisher BMC
series International Journal of Emergency Medicine
issn 1865-1372
1865-1380
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract Background Various risk scores have been proposed that are useful for the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), which is an important disease in emergency medicine. Few studies have examined the usefulness of Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI) in this disease, which evaluates the patient’s general condition by scoring the patient’s underlying disease. There have been no studies investigating the efficacy of CCI compared to other risk scores in the management of UGIB requiring endoscopic hemostasis. Methods In addition to the Glasgow-Blatchford score, AIMS65 score, and Rockall score, we investigated the efficacy of the outcome prediction obtained by the original CCI and the updated CCI, scored only with respect to the underlying disease. We also examined the cutoff value when using the risk score. This retrospective study included 265 patients with hemorrhagic upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions who underwent emergency endoscopic hemostasis during a 6-year period between 2011 and 2016 in our hospital. Results The updated CCI and AIMS65 score correlated with prognosis in multivariate analysis (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively). In clinical practice, the prognosis might be worse if both updated CCI and AIMS65 score were 3 point or more. Conclusion In addition to the AIMS65 score, the updated CCI can be a useful tool for managing upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder bleeding that requires endoscopic hemostasis.
topic AIMS65 score
Charlson Comorbidity Index
Prognosis
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Upper gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12245-020-00293-x
work_keys_str_mv AT shinyakita comparisonofvariousriskscoresfortheprognosisofhemorrhagicuppergastrointestinalmucosaldisorder
AT yasuyukishirai comparisonofvariousriskscoresfortheprognosisofhemorrhagicuppergastrointestinalmucosaldisorder
AT tomoharuyoshida comparisonofvariousriskscoresfortheprognosisofhemorrhagicuppergastrointestinalmucosaldisorder
AT keishiraishi comparisonofvariousriskscoresfortheprognosisofhemorrhagicuppergastrointestinalmucosaldisorder
AT ayakonakamura comparisonofvariousriskscoresfortheprognosisofhemorrhagicuppergastrointestinalmucosaldisorder
AT michitakakawano comparisonofvariousriskscoresfortheprognosisofhemorrhagicuppergastrointestinalmucosaldisorder
AT yoshihirokinoshita comparisonofvariousriskscoresfortheprognosisofhemorrhagicuppergastrointestinalmucosaldisorder
AT tatsuyanoguchi comparisonofvariousriskscoresfortheprognosisofhemorrhagicuppergastrointestinalmucosaldisorder
AT syunsukeito comparisonofvariousriskscoresfortheprognosisofhemorrhagicuppergastrointestinalmucosaldisorder
_version_ 1724601898222223360