Proximal Femoral Nail for Treatment of Trochanteric Femoral Fractures

Purpose. To report outcomes of 87 consecutive patients treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFN) for trochanteric femoral fractures. Methods. 17 men and 70 women aged 58 to 95 (mean, 85) years with trochanteric femoral fractures underwent PFN fixation using an intramedullary nail, a lag screw, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T Morihara, Y Arai, S Tokugawa, S Fujita, K Chatani, T Kubo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2007-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900701500305
id doaj-620d5c1d4b9c4a979405a9a749b7b480
record_format Article
spelling doaj-620d5c1d4b9c4a979405a9a749b7b4802020-11-25T03:45:05ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902007-12-011510.1177/230949900701500305Proximal Femoral Nail for Treatment of Trochanteric Femoral FracturesT MoriharaY AraiS TokugawaS FujitaK ChataniT KuboPurpose. To report outcomes of 87 consecutive patients treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFN) for trochanteric femoral fractures. Methods. 17 men and 70 women aged 58 to 95 (mean, 85) years with trochanteric femoral fractures underwent PFN fixation using an intramedullary nail, a lag screw, and a hip pin. Fractures were classified according to the AO system; the most common fracture type was A2 (n=45), followed by A1 (n=36) and A3 (n=6). The position of the lag screw within the femoral head was measured. The lateral slide of the lag screw after fracture consolidation was measured by comparing the immediate postoperative and final anteroposterior radiographs. Results. 90% of lag screws were placed in an optimal position. The length of lateral slide of the lag screw in stable A1 fractures was significantly less than that in unstable A2 fractures; it was over 10 mm in 7 of 45 patients with A2 fractures. Cut-out of lag screw did not occur, suggesting that free sliding of the lag screw facilitates direct impaction between fragments. Conclusion. A PFN is useful for the treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900701500305
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T Morihara
Y Arai
S Tokugawa
S Fujita
K Chatani
T Kubo
spellingShingle T Morihara
Y Arai
S Tokugawa
S Fujita
K Chatani
T Kubo
Proximal Femoral Nail for Treatment of Trochanteric Femoral Fractures
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet T Morihara
Y Arai
S Tokugawa
S Fujita
K Chatani
T Kubo
author_sort T Morihara
title Proximal Femoral Nail for Treatment of Trochanteric Femoral Fractures
title_short Proximal Femoral Nail for Treatment of Trochanteric Femoral Fractures
title_full Proximal Femoral Nail for Treatment of Trochanteric Femoral Fractures
title_fullStr Proximal Femoral Nail for Treatment of Trochanteric Femoral Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Proximal Femoral Nail for Treatment of Trochanteric Femoral Fractures
title_sort proximal femoral nail for treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2007-12-01
description Purpose. To report outcomes of 87 consecutive patients treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFN) for trochanteric femoral fractures. Methods. 17 men and 70 women aged 58 to 95 (mean, 85) years with trochanteric femoral fractures underwent PFN fixation using an intramedullary nail, a lag screw, and a hip pin. Fractures were classified according to the AO system; the most common fracture type was A2 (n=45), followed by A1 (n=36) and A3 (n=6). The position of the lag screw within the femoral head was measured. The lateral slide of the lag screw after fracture consolidation was measured by comparing the immediate postoperative and final anteroposterior radiographs. Results. 90% of lag screws were placed in an optimal position. The length of lateral slide of the lag screw in stable A1 fractures was significantly less than that in unstable A2 fractures; it was over 10 mm in 7 of 45 patients with A2 fractures. Cut-out of lag screw did not occur, suggesting that free sliding of the lag screw facilitates direct impaction between fragments. Conclusion. A PFN is useful for the treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900701500305
work_keys_str_mv AT tmorihara proximalfemoralnailfortreatmentoftrochantericfemoralfractures
AT yarai proximalfemoralnailfortreatmentoftrochantericfemoralfractures
AT stokugawa proximalfemoralnailfortreatmentoftrochantericfemoralfractures
AT sfujita proximalfemoralnailfortreatmentoftrochantericfemoralfractures
AT kchatani proximalfemoralnailfortreatmentoftrochantericfemoralfractures
AT tkubo proximalfemoralnailfortreatmentoftrochantericfemoralfractures
_version_ 1724511490508062720