Modeling invariant object processing based on tight integration of simulated and empirical data in a Common Brain Space
Both in the field of Computer Vision and Experimental Neuroscience, recent advances have been made regarding the mechanisms underlying invariant object recognition. However, the differential methodological aims in both fields caused an independent model evolvement. A tighter integration of simulatio...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2012.00012/full |
id |
doaj-621fa93559f1471a911f8c31120bc1b1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-621fa93559f1471a911f8c31120bc1b12020-11-24T22:50:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience1662-51882012-03-01610.3389/fncom.2012.0001218141Modeling invariant object processing based on tight integration of simulated and empirical data in a Common Brain SpaceJudith Carolien Peters0Judith Carolien Peters1Judith Carolien Peters2Joel eReithler3Joel eReithler4Joel eReithler5Rainer eGoebel6Rainer eGoebel7Rainer eGoebel8The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences)Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht UniversityMaastricht Brain Imaging Center (M-BIC), Maastricht UniversityThe Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences)Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht UniversityMaastricht Brain Imaging Center (M-BIC), Maastricht UniversityThe Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences)Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht UniversityMaastricht Brain Imaging Center (M-BIC), Maastricht UniversityBoth in the field of Computer Vision and Experimental Neuroscience, recent advances have been made regarding the mechanisms underlying invariant object recognition. However, the differential methodological aims in both fields caused an independent model evolvement. A tighter integration of simulations and empirical observations may contribute to cross-fertilized development of 1) neurobiologically plausible computational models and 2) computationally-defined empirical theories, incrementally merged into a comprehensive brain model.We review recent fMRI findings on object invariance and suggest how they can be quantitatively compared to model simulations by projecting predicted and observed data in one Common Brain Space". The simultaneous matching of activity patterns within and across multiple processing stages in the simulated and empirical large-scale network may help to clarify how high-order invariant representations are created from low-level features. Given that columnar-level imaging is now in reach, due to the advent of high-resolution fMRI, it is time to capitalize on this new window into the brain and test which predictions of the various object recognition models are supported by this novel empirical evidence.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2012.00012/fullNeuroimagingobject perceptionobject invariance(high-field) fMRIlarge-scale neuromodelingmultimodal data integration |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Judith Carolien Peters Judith Carolien Peters Judith Carolien Peters Joel eReithler Joel eReithler Joel eReithler Rainer eGoebel Rainer eGoebel Rainer eGoebel |
spellingShingle |
Judith Carolien Peters Judith Carolien Peters Judith Carolien Peters Joel eReithler Joel eReithler Joel eReithler Rainer eGoebel Rainer eGoebel Rainer eGoebel Modeling invariant object processing based on tight integration of simulated and empirical data in a Common Brain Space Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience Neuroimaging object perception object invariance (high-field) fMRI large-scale neuromodeling multimodal data integration |
author_facet |
Judith Carolien Peters Judith Carolien Peters Judith Carolien Peters Joel eReithler Joel eReithler Joel eReithler Rainer eGoebel Rainer eGoebel Rainer eGoebel |
author_sort |
Judith Carolien Peters |
title |
Modeling invariant object processing based on tight integration of simulated and empirical data in a Common Brain Space |
title_short |
Modeling invariant object processing based on tight integration of simulated and empirical data in a Common Brain Space |
title_full |
Modeling invariant object processing based on tight integration of simulated and empirical data in a Common Brain Space |
title_fullStr |
Modeling invariant object processing based on tight integration of simulated and empirical data in a Common Brain Space |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modeling invariant object processing based on tight integration of simulated and empirical data in a Common Brain Space |
title_sort |
modeling invariant object processing based on tight integration of simulated and empirical data in a common brain space |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-5188 |
publishDate |
2012-03-01 |
description |
Both in the field of Computer Vision and Experimental Neuroscience, recent advances have been made regarding the mechanisms underlying invariant object recognition. However, the differential methodological aims in both fields caused an independent model evolvement. A tighter integration of simulations and empirical observations may contribute to cross-fertilized development of 1) neurobiologically plausible computational models and 2) computationally-defined empirical theories, incrementally merged into a comprehensive brain model.We review recent fMRI findings on object invariance and suggest how they can be quantitatively compared to model simulations by projecting predicted and observed data in one Common Brain Space". The simultaneous matching of activity patterns within and across multiple processing stages in the simulated and empirical large-scale network may help to clarify how high-order invariant representations are created from low-level features. Given that columnar-level imaging is now in reach, due to the advent of high-resolution fMRI, it is time to capitalize on this new window into the brain and test which predictions of the various object recognition models are supported by this novel empirical evidence. |
topic |
Neuroimaging object perception object invariance (high-field) fMRI large-scale neuromodeling multimodal data integration |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2012.00012/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT judithcarolienpeters modelinginvariantobjectprocessingbasedontightintegrationofsimulatedandempiricaldatainacommonbrainspace AT judithcarolienpeters modelinginvariantobjectprocessingbasedontightintegrationofsimulatedandempiricaldatainacommonbrainspace AT judithcarolienpeters modelinginvariantobjectprocessingbasedontightintegrationofsimulatedandempiricaldatainacommonbrainspace AT joelereithler modelinginvariantobjectprocessingbasedontightintegrationofsimulatedandempiricaldatainacommonbrainspace AT joelereithler modelinginvariantobjectprocessingbasedontightintegrationofsimulatedandempiricaldatainacommonbrainspace AT joelereithler modelinginvariantobjectprocessingbasedontightintegrationofsimulatedandempiricaldatainacommonbrainspace AT raineregoebel modelinginvariantobjectprocessingbasedontightintegrationofsimulatedandempiricaldatainacommonbrainspace AT raineregoebel modelinginvariantobjectprocessingbasedontightintegrationofsimulatedandempiricaldatainacommonbrainspace AT raineregoebel modelinginvariantobjectprocessingbasedontightintegrationofsimulatedandempiricaldatainacommonbrainspace |
_version_ |
1725673836533252096 |