Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual m...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/15/2381 |
id |
doaj-623c93a7ab6940369ee8589fa4f613e6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-623c93a7ab6940369ee8589fa4f613e62020-11-24T21:51:18ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442019-07-011215238110.3390/ma12152381ma12152381Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint InterfaceRenxiu Han0Guoxi Li1Jingzhong Gong2Meng Zhang3Kai Zhang4College of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, ChinaCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Hunan International Economics University, Changsha 410205, ChinaCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, ChinaCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, ChinaIn order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual material method, spring damping method, finite element method, and verification by modal experiment. First, according to the contact mechanics model of the constructed metal joint interface, the physical properties of the three-dimensional models of the fixed joint interface are assigned in the ANSYS software. Then, three methods are used for the modal analysis and compared with a modal experiment. The results show that the modal shapes of the three theoretical methods are consistent with those of the experimental modes. The first five natural frequencies obtained by the virtual material method are closest to the experimental natural frequencies, and the errors are within 10%. The errors of the other two methods are between 9% and 39%. Therefore, the virtual material method is a better equivalent method of the metal joint interface.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/15/2381metal joint interfacevirtual material methodmodal experiment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Renxiu Han Guoxi Li Jingzhong Gong Meng Zhang Kai Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Renxiu Han Guoxi Li Jingzhong Gong Meng Zhang Kai Zhang Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface Materials metal joint interface virtual material method modal experiment |
author_facet |
Renxiu Han Guoxi Li Jingzhong Gong Meng Zhang Kai Zhang |
author_sort |
Renxiu Han |
title |
Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title_short |
Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title_full |
Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title_fullStr |
Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title_full_unstemmed |
Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title_sort |
experimental verification and comparative analysis of equivalent methods on metal’s fixed joint interface |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Materials |
issn |
1996-1944 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual material method, spring damping method, finite element method, and verification by modal experiment. First, according to the contact mechanics model of the constructed metal joint interface, the physical properties of the three-dimensional models of the fixed joint interface are assigned in the ANSYS software. Then, three methods are used for the modal analysis and compared with a modal experiment. The results show that the modal shapes of the three theoretical methods are consistent with those of the experimental modes. The first five natural frequencies obtained by the virtual material method are closest to the experimental natural frequencies, and the errors are within 10%. The errors of the other two methods are between 9% and 39%. Therefore, the virtual material method is a better equivalent method of the metal joint interface. |
topic |
metal joint interface virtual material method modal experiment |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/15/2381 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT renxiuhan experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface AT guoxili experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface AT jingzhonggong experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface AT mengzhang experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface AT kaizhang experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface |
_version_ |
1725879283809779712 |