Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface

In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renxiu Han, Guoxi Li, Jingzhong Gong, Meng Zhang, Kai Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/15/2381
id doaj-623c93a7ab6940369ee8589fa4f613e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-623c93a7ab6940369ee8589fa4f613e62020-11-24T21:51:18ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442019-07-011215238110.3390/ma12152381ma12152381Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint InterfaceRenxiu Han0Guoxi Li1Jingzhong Gong2Meng Zhang3Kai Zhang4College of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, ChinaCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Hunan International Economics University, Changsha 410205, ChinaCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, ChinaCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, ChinaIn order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual material method, spring damping method, finite element method, and verification by modal experiment. First, according to the contact mechanics model of the constructed metal joint interface, the physical properties of the three-dimensional models of the fixed joint interface are assigned in the ANSYS software. Then, three methods are used for the modal analysis and compared with a modal experiment. The results show that the modal shapes of the three theoretical methods are consistent with those of the experimental modes. The first five natural frequencies obtained by the virtual material method are closest to the experimental natural frequencies, and the errors are within 10%. The errors of the other two methods are between 9% and 39%. Therefore, the virtual material method is a better equivalent method of the metal joint interface.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/15/2381metal joint interfacevirtual material methodmodal experiment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Renxiu Han
Guoxi Li
Jingzhong Gong
Meng Zhang
Kai Zhang
spellingShingle Renxiu Han
Guoxi Li
Jingzhong Gong
Meng Zhang
Kai Zhang
Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
Materials
metal joint interface
virtual material method
modal experiment
author_facet Renxiu Han
Guoxi Li
Jingzhong Gong
Meng Zhang
Kai Zhang
author_sort Renxiu Han
title Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title_short Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title_full Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title_fullStr Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title_sort experimental verification and comparative analysis of equivalent methods on metal’s fixed joint interface
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2019-07-01
description In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual material method, spring damping method, finite element method, and verification by modal experiment. First, according to the contact mechanics model of the constructed metal joint interface, the physical properties of the three-dimensional models of the fixed joint interface are assigned in the ANSYS software. Then, three methods are used for the modal analysis and compared with a modal experiment. The results show that the modal shapes of the three theoretical methods are consistent with those of the experimental modes. The first five natural frequencies obtained by the virtual material method are closest to the experimental natural frequencies, and the errors are within 10%. The errors of the other two methods are between 9% and 39%. Therefore, the virtual material method is a better equivalent method of the metal joint interface.
topic metal joint interface
virtual material method
modal experiment
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/15/2381
work_keys_str_mv AT renxiuhan experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface
AT guoxili experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface
AT jingzhonggong experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface
AT mengzhang experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface
AT kaizhang experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface
_version_ 1725879283809779712