Understanding the “Cash-Less” Nature of Government-Sponsored Health Insurance Schemes

The public health spending in India has been hovering around 1% of gross domestic product (GDP), and it contributes only 28% of total health expenditure. Hence, out-of-pocket (OOP) payments continue to be the dominant source of health care financing in India. However, for providing protection from t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Priyanka Rent, Soumitra Ghosh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-11-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015614607
id doaj-627ac4c699ec4778beb0c0afe7b50611
record_format Article
spelling doaj-627ac4c699ec4778beb0c0afe7b506112020-11-25T03:24:08ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402015-11-01510.1177/215824401561460710.1177_2158244015614607Understanding the “Cash-Less” Nature of Government-Sponsored Health Insurance SchemesPriyanka Rent0Soumitra Ghosh1K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, IndiaTata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, IndiaThe public health spending in India has been hovering around 1% of gross domestic product (GDP), and it contributes only 28% of total health expenditure. Hence, out-of-pocket (OOP) payments continue to be the dominant source of health care financing in India. However, for providing protection from the economic effects of health shocks, last few years have seen a plethora of central and state government–sponsored private health insurance schemes for the deprived groups, particularly those working in the unorganized sector. The latest is the Rajiv Gandhi Jeevandayee Arogya Yojana (RGJAY), launched by the Government of Maharashtra in 2012. This study is an attempt to assess the extent to which RGJAY protects the families from making OOP expenditure while availing the tertiary care from the RGJAY accredited facilities. Both primary and secondary data were utilized for this study. Despite being enrolled in RGJAY, more than three fifths (63%) of the beneficiaries still incurred OOP payments for services when admitted in the hospital, and more worryingly, it was found that a significantly higher proportion of persons from Below Poverty Line (BPL) families (88.23%) reported paying for diagnostics, medications, or consumables. Furthermore, our study found that about a third of the beneficiaries experienced financial catastrophe if indirect expenditure is taken into consideration. This also implies that for the poor, ill-health has further deepened the existing poverty.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015614607
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Priyanka Rent
Soumitra Ghosh
spellingShingle Priyanka Rent
Soumitra Ghosh
Understanding the “Cash-Less” Nature of Government-Sponsored Health Insurance Schemes
SAGE Open
author_facet Priyanka Rent
Soumitra Ghosh
author_sort Priyanka Rent
title Understanding the “Cash-Less” Nature of Government-Sponsored Health Insurance Schemes
title_short Understanding the “Cash-Less” Nature of Government-Sponsored Health Insurance Schemes
title_full Understanding the “Cash-Less” Nature of Government-Sponsored Health Insurance Schemes
title_fullStr Understanding the “Cash-Less” Nature of Government-Sponsored Health Insurance Schemes
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the “Cash-Less” Nature of Government-Sponsored Health Insurance Schemes
title_sort understanding the “cash-less” nature of government-sponsored health insurance schemes
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2015-11-01
description The public health spending in India has been hovering around 1% of gross domestic product (GDP), and it contributes only 28% of total health expenditure. Hence, out-of-pocket (OOP) payments continue to be the dominant source of health care financing in India. However, for providing protection from the economic effects of health shocks, last few years have seen a plethora of central and state government–sponsored private health insurance schemes for the deprived groups, particularly those working in the unorganized sector. The latest is the Rajiv Gandhi Jeevandayee Arogya Yojana (RGJAY), launched by the Government of Maharashtra in 2012. This study is an attempt to assess the extent to which RGJAY protects the families from making OOP expenditure while availing the tertiary care from the RGJAY accredited facilities. Both primary and secondary data were utilized for this study. Despite being enrolled in RGJAY, more than three fifths (63%) of the beneficiaries still incurred OOP payments for services when admitted in the hospital, and more worryingly, it was found that a significantly higher proportion of persons from Below Poverty Line (BPL) families (88.23%) reported paying for diagnostics, medications, or consumables. Furthermore, our study found that about a third of the beneficiaries experienced financial catastrophe if indirect expenditure is taken into consideration. This also implies that for the poor, ill-health has further deepened the existing poverty.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015614607
work_keys_str_mv AT priyankarent understandingthecashlessnatureofgovernmentsponsoredhealthinsuranceschemes
AT soumitraghosh understandingthecashlessnatureofgovernmentsponsoredhealthinsuranceschemes
_version_ 1724603140849795072