Chest tube versus pigtail catheter in the management of empyema

Background Chest tubes are cornerstone for draining fluid in empyema. Insertion of an intercostal tube is considered an invasive intervention with significant morbidity. In a trial to avoid potential complications, the use of pigtail catheter instead of conventional chest tube in pleural drainage ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Hantera, Hamed Abdel-Hafiz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2019;volume=68;issue=3;spage=390;epage=393;aulast=Hantera
id doaj-62807ec6f4044f5aae3dd6b53dfec299
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62807ec6f4044f5aae3dd6b53dfec2992020-11-25T01:53:47ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEgyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis0422-76382090-99502019-01-0168339039310.4103/ejcdt.ejcdt_206_18Chest tube versus pigtail catheter in the management of empyemaMohamed HanteraHamed Abdel-HafizBackground Chest tubes are cornerstone for draining fluid in empyema. Insertion of an intercostal tube is considered an invasive intervention with significant morbidity. In a trial to avoid potential complications, the use of pigtail catheter instead of conventional chest tube in pleural drainage has been tried. The aim of current study was to observe the benefit of pigtail drainage over chest tube for draining empyema. Methods It was an observational prospective study. A detailed history and clinical evaluation were done for all patients. Patients were treated by either intercostal tube or pigtail catheter insertion depending on judgment of treating physician. Sonography guided insertion was done when needed. Outcomes of interest were duration of drainage, duration of analgesics use and time of hospital stay. Results Sixty patients were included in present study. Thirty patients were subjected to conventional intercostal tube, Another 30 patients were subjected to pigtail catheters. There were no significant differences regarding outcome, duration of drains, duration of antibiotic use and time of hospital stay in two groups. Duration of analgesics use was significantly lower in pigtail group. Conclusions The pigtail catheter gives dependable treatment for empyema and is a safe and less traumatic option than chest tube. There was no significant difference regarding outcome, duration of drains and time of hospital stay in two groups.http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2019;volume=68;issue=3;spage=390;epage=393;aulast=Hanterachest tubeempyemapigtail catheter
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohamed Hantera
Hamed Abdel-Hafiz
spellingShingle Mohamed Hantera
Hamed Abdel-Hafiz
Chest tube versus pigtail catheter in the management of empyema
Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
chest tube
empyema
pigtail catheter
author_facet Mohamed Hantera
Hamed Abdel-Hafiz
author_sort Mohamed Hantera
title Chest tube versus pigtail catheter in the management of empyema
title_short Chest tube versus pigtail catheter in the management of empyema
title_full Chest tube versus pigtail catheter in the management of empyema
title_fullStr Chest tube versus pigtail catheter in the management of empyema
title_full_unstemmed Chest tube versus pigtail catheter in the management of empyema
title_sort chest tube versus pigtail catheter in the management of empyema
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
issn 0422-7638
2090-9950
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background Chest tubes are cornerstone for draining fluid in empyema. Insertion of an intercostal tube is considered an invasive intervention with significant morbidity. In a trial to avoid potential complications, the use of pigtail catheter instead of conventional chest tube in pleural drainage has been tried. The aim of current study was to observe the benefit of pigtail drainage over chest tube for draining empyema. Methods It was an observational prospective study. A detailed history and clinical evaluation were done for all patients. Patients were treated by either intercostal tube or pigtail catheter insertion depending on judgment of treating physician. Sonography guided insertion was done when needed. Outcomes of interest were duration of drainage, duration of analgesics use and time of hospital stay. Results Sixty patients were included in present study. Thirty patients were subjected to conventional intercostal tube, Another 30 patients were subjected to pigtail catheters. There were no significant differences regarding outcome, duration of drains, duration of antibiotic use and time of hospital stay in two groups. Duration of analgesics use was significantly lower in pigtail group. Conclusions The pigtail catheter gives dependable treatment for empyema and is a safe and less traumatic option than chest tube. There was no significant difference regarding outcome, duration of drains and time of hospital stay in two groups.
topic chest tube
empyema
pigtail catheter
url http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2019;volume=68;issue=3;spage=390;epage=393;aulast=Hantera
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedhantera chesttubeversuspigtailcatheterinthemanagementofempyema
AT hamedabdelhafiz chesttubeversuspigtailcatheterinthemanagementofempyema
_version_ 1724989029260197888