Multi-Night Validation of a Sleep Tracking Ring in Adolescents Compared with a Research Actigraph and Polysomnography

• Main Authors: Chee NIYN, Ghorbani S, Golkashani HA, Leong RLF, Ong JL, Chee MWL
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dove Medical Press 2021-02-01
• Series: Nature and Science of Sleep
• Subjects: validation; adolescents; wearable; polysomnography; actigraphy
• Online Access: https://www.dovepress.com/multi-night-validation-of-a-sleep-tracking-ring-in-adolescents-compare-peer-reviewed-article-NSS

Nicholas IYN Chee,* Shohreh Ghorbani,* Hosein Aghayan Golkashani, Ruth LF Leong, Ju Lynn Ong, Michael WL Chee Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Michael WL CheeCentre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, MD1 Level 13 Rm 05B, National University of Singapore, 117549, SingaporeTel [phone]Email [e-mail]: Wearable devices have tremendous potential for large-scale longitudinal measurement of sleep, but their accuracy needs to be validated. We compared the performance of the multisensor Oura ring (Oura Health Oy, Oulu, Finland) to polysomnography (PSG) and a research actigraph in healthy adolescents.Methods: Fifty-three adolescents (28 females; aged 15– 19 years) underwent overnight PSG monitoring while wearing both an Oura ring and Actiwatch 2 (Philips Respironics, USA). Measurements were made over multiple nights and across three levels of sleep opportunity (5 nights with either 6.5 or 8h, and 3 nights with 9h). Actiwatch data at two sensitivity settings were analyzed. Discrepancies in estimated sleep measures as well as sleep-wake, and sleep stage agreements were evaluated using Bland–Altman plots and epoch-by-epoch (EBE) analyses.Results: Compared with PSG, Oura consistently underestimated TST by an average of 32.8 to 47.3 minutes (Ps < 0.001) across the different TIB conditions; Actiwatch 2 at its default setting underestimated TST by 25.8 to 33.9 minutes. Oura significantly overestimated WASO by an average of 30.7 to 46.3 minutes. It was comparable to Actiwatch 2 at default sensitivity in the 6.5, and 8h TIB conditions. Relative to PSG, Oura significantly underestimated REM sleep (12.8 to 19.5 minutes) and light sleep (51.1 to 81.2 minutes) but overestimated N3 by 31.5 to 46.8 minutes (Ps < 0.01). EBE analyses demonstrated excellent sleep-wake accuracies, specificities, and sensitivities – between 0.88 and 0.89 across all TIBs.Conclusion: The Oura ring yielded comparable sleep measurement to research grade actigraphy at the latter’s default settings. Sleep staging needs improvement. However, the device appears adequate for characterizing the effect of sleep duration manipulation on adolescent sleep macro-architecture.Keywords: validation, adolescents, wearable, polysomnography, actigraphy