Relative contributions of neighbourhood and animal movements to Coxiella burnetii infection in dairy cattle herds

• Main Authors: Simon Nusinovici, Thierry Hoch, Stefan Widgren, Alain Joly, Ann Lindberg, François Beaudeau
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: PAGEPress Publications 2014-05-01
• Series: Geospatial Health
• Subjects: Q fever, epidemiology, risk factor, spatial clustering, control measures, France, Sweden.
• Online Access: http://www.geospatialhealth.net/index.php/gh/article/view/36

Q fever in dairy cattle herds occurs mainly after inhalation of contaminated aerosols generated from excreta by shedder animals. Propagation of <em>Coxiella burnetii</em>, the cause of the disease between ruminant herds could result from transmission between neighbouring herds and/or the introduction of infected shedder animals in healthy herds. The objective of this study were (i) to describe the spatial distribution <em>C. burnetii</em>-infected dairy cattle herds in two different regions: the Finistère District in France (2,829 herds) and the island of Gotland in Sweden (119 herds) and (ii) to quantify and compare the relative contributions of <em>C. burnetii</em> transmission related to neighbourhood and to animal movements on the risk for a herd to be infected. An enzyme - linked immunosorbent assay was used for testing bulk tank milk in May 2012 and June 2011, respectively. Only one geographical cluster of positive herds was identified in north-western Finistère. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of risk for a herd to test positively with local cattle density (the total number of cattle located in a 5 km radius circle) and the in-degree (ID) parameter, a measure of the number of herds from which each herd had received animals directly within the last 2 years. The risk for a herd to test positively was higher for herds with a higher local cattle density [odds ratio (OR) = 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6-3.2, for herds with a local density between 100 and 120 compared to herds with a local density 60]. The risk was also higher for herds with higher IDs (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.6-3.2, for herds with ID 3 compared to herds that did not introduce animals). The proportion of cases attributable to infections in the neighbourhood in high-density areas was twice the proportion attributable to animal movements, suggesting that wind plays a main role in the transmission.