What Is Body, What Is Space? Performance and the Cinematic Body in a Non-Anthropocentric Cinema

The assumption of a clear demarcation and hierarchy between figure and ground has long informed key approaches in film studies to bodies and space. However, many filmmakers working in both animation and live cinema have confounded this hierarchy, working with an integration of figure and ground on e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anne Rutherford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-11-01
Series:Arts
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/6/4/19
id doaj-62d1bd7f3ad940748fba4dd5bd5e1b3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62d1bd7f3ad940748fba4dd5bd5e1b3b2020-11-24T23:54:56ZengMDPI AGArts2076-07522017-11-01641910.3390/arts6040019arts6040019What Is Body, What Is Space? Performance and the Cinematic Body in a Non-Anthropocentric CinemaAnne Rutherford0Cinema Studies, School of Humanities and Communication Arts, Western Sydney University, Bankstown Campus, Bldg 5, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, AustraliaThe assumption of a clear demarcation and hierarchy between figure and ground has long informed key approaches in film studies to bodies and space. However, many filmmakers working in both animation and live cinema have confounded this hierarchy, working with an integration of figure and ground on equal terms to explore the full performative potential of the cinematic body. In the animation work of Einar Baldvin, this strategy is an Expressionist one, blurring the boundaries between figure and ground in order to project affective and psychic states onto the space around the body. In Wong Kar-wai’s The Grandmaster, this blurring of boundaries between figure and ground eschews an Expressionist mode, working instead to render, in aesthetic form, a biophilosophy that emphasizes the continuity between bodies and environment to explore the possibilities of non-anthropocentric cinematic modes. An experimental writing style here serves to trace the energetic unfolding of these strategies across both films in order to frame the question, ‘what is body here, what is space’, and to ask how we as viewers engage with this embodied mode.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/6/4/19film studiescinematic bodycinematic spaceanimationHong Kong cinemamise en scène
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Rutherford
spellingShingle Anne Rutherford
What Is Body, What Is Space? Performance and the Cinematic Body in a Non-Anthropocentric Cinema
Arts
film studies
cinematic body
cinematic space
animation
Hong Kong cinema
mise en scène
author_facet Anne Rutherford
author_sort Anne Rutherford
title What Is Body, What Is Space? Performance and the Cinematic Body in a Non-Anthropocentric Cinema
title_short What Is Body, What Is Space? Performance and the Cinematic Body in a Non-Anthropocentric Cinema
title_full What Is Body, What Is Space? Performance and the Cinematic Body in a Non-Anthropocentric Cinema
title_fullStr What Is Body, What Is Space? Performance and the Cinematic Body in a Non-Anthropocentric Cinema
title_full_unstemmed What Is Body, What Is Space? Performance and the Cinematic Body in a Non-Anthropocentric Cinema
title_sort what is body, what is space? performance and the cinematic body in a non-anthropocentric cinema
publisher MDPI AG
series Arts
issn 2076-0752
publishDate 2017-11-01
description The assumption of a clear demarcation and hierarchy between figure and ground has long informed key approaches in film studies to bodies and space. However, many filmmakers working in both animation and live cinema have confounded this hierarchy, working with an integration of figure and ground on equal terms to explore the full performative potential of the cinematic body. In the animation work of Einar Baldvin, this strategy is an Expressionist one, blurring the boundaries between figure and ground in order to project affective and psychic states onto the space around the body. In Wong Kar-wai’s The Grandmaster, this blurring of boundaries between figure and ground eschews an Expressionist mode, working instead to render, in aesthetic form, a biophilosophy that emphasizes the continuity between bodies and environment to explore the possibilities of non-anthropocentric cinematic modes. An experimental writing style here serves to trace the energetic unfolding of these strategies across both films in order to frame the question, ‘what is body here, what is space’, and to ask how we as viewers engage with this embodied mode.
topic film studies
cinematic body
cinematic space
animation
Hong Kong cinema
mise en scène
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/6/4/19
work_keys_str_mv AT annerutherford whatisbodywhatisspaceperformanceandthecinematicbodyinanonanthropocentriccinema
_version_ 1725464290472755200