Dik en dun, gesirkuleer en afgestroop - kringlope om ’n gedig van T.T. Cloete

This article explores the deconstructive technique of the reversal of oppositions by applying it to “uitgedun” (depleted, or depletion) from T.T. Cloete’s first collection, Angelliera. The single most important opposition in the poem, viz. between the basic and the complex or the rich (already a rev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: H. Viljoen
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 1989-05-01
Series:Literator
Online Access:https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/829
id doaj-62e8a630e9d24b40b9f47b949a50a201
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62e8a630e9d24b40b9f47b949a50a2012020-11-24T21:05:15ZafrAOSISLiterator0258-22792219-82371989-05-01102454910.4102/lit.v10i2.829769Dik en dun, gesirkuleer en afgestroop - kringlope om ’n gedig van T.T. CloeteH. Viljoen0Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir CHOThis article explores the deconstructive technique of the reversal of oppositions by applying it to “uitgedun” (depleted, or depletion) from T.T. Cloete’s first collection, Angelliera. The single most important opposition in the poem, viz. between the basic and the complex or the rich (already a reversal of the usual polarity), is shown to be reversible. The absent rich and full state is necessary to confer a positive meaning on what is essential. The text, however, contradicts itself in the first stanza. There it reaches out to a possible full and rich state in the future, which contradicts the celebration of the basic or depleted state in the rest of the poem. The basic state is celebrated as a state of presentness to the self, after a period of self-alienation to the not so basic. However, the different metaphors of circulation - of blood, of merchandise and of bodies - in the end rather suggest an absence of selfhood, a self split and alienated from itself by cheap exchange in various circulations.https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/829
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. Viljoen
spellingShingle H. Viljoen
Dik en dun, gesirkuleer en afgestroop - kringlope om ’n gedig van T.T. Cloete
Literator
author_facet H. Viljoen
author_sort H. Viljoen
title Dik en dun, gesirkuleer en afgestroop - kringlope om ’n gedig van T.T. Cloete
title_short Dik en dun, gesirkuleer en afgestroop - kringlope om ’n gedig van T.T. Cloete
title_full Dik en dun, gesirkuleer en afgestroop - kringlope om ’n gedig van T.T. Cloete
title_fullStr Dik en dun, gesirkuleer en afgestroop - kringlope om ’n gedig van T.T. Cloete
title_full_unstemmed Dik en dun, gesirkuleer en afgestroop - kringlope om ’n gedig van T.T. Cloete
title_sort dik en dun, gesirkuleer en afgestroop - kringlope om ’n gedig van t.t. cloete
publisher AOSIS
series Literator
issn 0258-2279
2219-8237
publishDate 1989-05-01
description This article explores the deconstructive technique of the reversal of oppositions by applying it to “uitgedun” (depleted, or depletion) from T.T. Cloete’s first collection, Angelliera. The single most important opposition in the poem, viz. between the basic and the complex or the rich (already a reversal of the usual polarity), is shown to be reversible. The absent rich and full state is necessary to confer a positive meaning on what is essential. The text, however, contradicts itself in the first stanza. There it reaches out to a possible full and rich state in the future, which contradicts the celebration of the basic or depleted state in the rest of the poem. The basic state is celebrated as a state of presentness to the self, after a period of self-alienation to the not so basic. However, the different metaphors of circulation - of blood, of merchandise and of bodies - in the end rather suggest an absence of selfhood, a self split and alienated from itself by cheap exchange in various circulations.
url https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/829
work_keys_str_mv AT hviljoen dikendungesirkuleerenafgestroopkringlopeomngedigvanttcloete
_version_ 1716769445859295232