The history canon project as politics of identity: Renationalizing history education in Denmark

In 2009, the Danish nation state implemented a history canon, Historie 09 , as an obligatory part of the history national curriculum in primary and lower secondary schools. The history canon was part of a high-profile 'cultural battle' that the Danish liberal–conservative political and in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Claus R. Haas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UCL Press 2018-09-01
Series:History Education Research Journal
Online Access:https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=ded48068-363f-4037-8451-0ec28828599e
id doaj-6310c9a725244d29b0576033c75fe96d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6310c9a725244d29b0576033c75fe96d2021-04-02T19:03:24ZengUCL PressHistory Education Research Journal2631-97132018-09-0110.18546/HERJ.15.2.02The history canon project as politics of identity: Renationalizing history education in DenmarkClaus R. HaasIn 2009, the Danish nation state implemented a history canon, Historie 09 , as an obligatory part of the history national curriculum in primary and lower secondary schools. The history canon was part of a high-profile 'cultural battle' that the Danish liberal–conservative political and intellectual elite initiated during the first decade of the twenty-first century – a conflict that also included several other curricular canons. The Danish history curriculum was meant to satisfy three aims: (1) to bolster students with historical cultural ballast as they are prepared to be a part of the globalized economy and community; (2) to revitalize a chronologically structured master narrative about the historical and cultural origins of the Danish nation; and (3) to incorporate history teaching into an ongoing political struggle against some of the possible consequences of increasing cultural and religious diversity in Denmark – and, accordingly, to further a re-traditionalized vision of Denmark as a culturally homogeneous society, presumably existing as distinct from the membership of a heterogeneous European Union. This paper analyses the background of the history canon project in terms of educational policy, how it was realized in the revised history curriculum of 2009, which is still in force, and finally how representatives of the political elite who framed the history canon interpret the history curriculum. I will conclude by briefly discussing how history teachers have responded to the history canon project.https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=ded48068-363f-4037-8451-0ec28828599e
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Claus R. Haas
spellingShingle Claus R. Haas
The history canon project as politics of identity: Renationalizing history education in Denmark
History Education Research Journal
author_facet Claus R. Haas
author_sort Claus R. Haas
title The history canon project as politics of identity: Renationalizing history education in Denmark
title_short The history canon project as politics of identity: Renationalizing history education in Denmark
title_full The history canon project as politics of identity: Renationalizing history education in Denmark
title_fullStr The history canon project as politics of identity: Renationalizing history education in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed The history canon project as politics of identity: Renationalizing history education in Denmark
title_sort history canon project as politics of identity: renationalizing history education in denmark
publisher UCL Press
series History Education Research Journal
issn 2631-9713
publishDate 2018-09-01
description In 2009, the Danish nation state implemented a history canon, Historie 09 , as an obligatory part of the history national curriculum in primary and lower secondary schools. The history canon was part of a high-profile 'cultural battle' that the Danish liberal–conservative political and intellectual elite initiated during the first decade of the twenty-first century – a conflict that also included several other curricular canons. The Danish history curriculum was meant to satisfy three aims: (1) to bolster students with historical cultural ballast as they are prepared to be a part of the globalized economy and community; (2) to revitalize a chronologically structured master narrative about the historical and cultural origins of the Danish nation; and (3) to incorporate history teaching into an ongoing political struggle against some of the possible consequences of increasing cultural and religious diversity in Denmark – and, accordingly, to further a re-traditionalized vision of Denmark as a culturally homogeneous society, presumably existing as distinct from the membership of a heterogeneous European Union. This paper analyses the background of the history canon project in terms of educational policy, how it was realized in the revised history curriculum of 2009, which is still in force, and finally how representatives of the political elite who framed the history canon interpret the history curriculum. I will conclude by briefly discussing how history teachers have responded to the history canon project.
url https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=ded48068-363f-4037-8451-0ec28828599e
work_keys_str_mv AT clausrhaas thehistorycanonprojectaspoliticsofidentityrenationalizinghistoryeducationindenmark
AT clausrhaas historycanonprojectaspoliticsofidentityrenationalizinghistoryeducationindenmark
_version_ 1721549816213798912