One-Dimensional Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis Using Strength-Controlled Constitutive Models: The Case of the Leaning Tower of Pisa’s Subsoil

The Leaning Tower of Pisa was built between 1173 and 1360 and began to lean at the beginning of its construction. Extensive investigations to reveal the causes of the tilting only began in the early 20th century. Although few earthquakes have been recorded, there is a renewed interest in the seismic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriele Fiorentino, Camillo Nuti, Nunziante Squeglia, Davide Lavorato, Stefano Stacul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-06-01
Series:Geosciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/8/7/228
id doaj-6314f6748143443fadf543af5959bb3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6314f6748143443fadf543af5959bb3f2020-11-25T00:55:35ZengMDPI AGGeosciences2076-32632018-06-018722810.3390/geosciences8070228geosciences8070228One-Dimensional Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis Using Strength-Controlled Constitutive Models: The Case of the Leaning Tower of Pisa’s SubsoilGabriele Fiorentino0Camillo Nuti1Nunziante Squeglia2Davide Lavorato3Stefano Stacul4Department of Architecture, Roma Tre University, 00153 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Architecture, Roma Tre University, 00153 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Architecture, Roma Tre University, 00153 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, ItalyThe Leaning Tower of Pisa was built between 1173 and 1360 and began to lean at the beginning of its construction. Extensive investigations to reveal the causes of the tilting only began in the early 20th century. Although few earthquakes have been recorded, there is a renewed interest in the seismic behavior of the tower triggered by the availability of new data and technologies. This paper highlights the influence of using new strength-controlled constitutive models in case of 1D nonlinear response analysis. This is an aspect that has been poorly investigated. Most of the computer codes currently available for nonlinear seismic response analysis (SRA) of soil use constitutive models able to capture small-strain behavior, but the large-strain shear strength is left uncontrolled. This can significantly affect the assessment of a 1-D response analysis and the Leaning Tower’s subsoil can be useful for this study as it represents a well-documented and well-characterized site. After a geological and geotechnical description of the subsoil profile and a synthesis of available data, the seismic input is defined. One-dimensional SRAs were carried out by means of a computer code which considers an equivalent-linear soil modelling and two codes which assume nonlinear soil response and permit to use strength-controlled constitutive models. All the parameters were calibrated on the basis of the same soil data, therefore allowing for a direct comparison of the results.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/8/7/228leaning towerseismic response analysisseismic inputstrength-controlled models
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gabriele Fiorentino
Camillo Nuti
Nunziante Squeglia
Davide Lavorato
Stefano Stacul
spellingShingle Gabriele Fiorentino
Camillo Nuti
Nunziante Squeglia
Davide Lavorato
Stefano Stacul
One-Dimensional Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis Using Strength-Controlled Constitutive Models: The Case of the Leaning Tower of Pisa’s Subsoil
Geosciences
leaning tower
seismic response analysis
seismic input
strength-controlled models
author_facet Gabriele Fiorentino
Camillo Nuti
Nunziante Squeglia
Davide Lavorato
Stefano Stacul
author_sort Gabriele Fiorentino
title One-Dimensional Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis Using Strength-Controlled Constitutive Models: The Case of the Leaning Tower of Pisa’s Subsoil
title_short One-Dimensional Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis Using Strength-Controlled Constitutive Models: The Case of the Leaning Tower of Pisa’s Subsoil
title_full One-Dimensional Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis Using Strength-Controlled Constitutive Models: The Case of the Leaning Tower of Pisa’s Subsoil
title_fullStr One-Dimensional Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis Using Strength-Controlled Constitutive Models: The Case of the Leaning Tower of Pisa’s Subsoil
title_full_unstemmed One-Dimensional Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis Using Strength-Controlled Constitutive Models: The Case of the Leaning Tower of Pisa’s Subsoil
title_sort one-dimensional nonlinear seismic response analysis using strength-controlled constitutive models: the case of the leaning tower of pisa’s subsoil
publisher MDPI AG
series Geosciences
issn 2076-3263
publishDate 2018-06-01
description The Leaning Tower of Pisa was built between 1173 and 1360 and began to lean at the beginning of its construction. Extensive investigations to reveal the causes of the tilting only began in the early 20th century. Although few earthquakes have been recorded, there is a renewed interest in the seismic behavior of the tower triggered by the availability of new data and technologies. This paper highlights the influence of using new strength-controlled constitutive models in case of 1D nonlinear response analysis. This is an aspect that has been poorly investigated. Most of the computer codes currently available for nonlinear seismic response analysis (SRA) of soil use constitutive models able to capture small-strain behavior, but the large-strain shear strength is left uncontrolled. This can significantly affect the assessment of a 1-D response analysis and the Leaning Tower’s subsoil can be useful for this study as it represents a well-documented and well-characterized site. After a geological and geotechnical description of the subsoil profile and a synthesis of available data, the seismic input is defined. One-dimensional SRAs were carried out by means of a computer code which considers an equivalent-linear soil modelling and two codes which assume nonlinear soil response and permit to use strength-controlled constitutive models. All the parameters were calibrated on the basis of the same soil data, therefore allowing for a direct comparison of the results.
topic leaning tower
seismic response analysis
seismic input
strength-controlled models
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/8/7/228
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielefiorentino onedimensionalnonlinearseismicresponseanalysisusingstrengthcontrolledconstitutivemodelsthecaseoftheleaningtowerofpisassubsoil
AT camillonuti onedimensionalnonlinearseismicresponseanalysisusingstrengthcontrolledconstitutivemodelsthecaseoftheleaningtowerofpisassubsoil
AT nunziantesqueglia onedimensionalnonlinearseismicresponseanalysisusingstrengthcontrolledconstitutivemodelsthecaseoftheleaningtowerofpisassubsoil
AT davidelavorato onedimensionalnonlinearseismicresponseanalysisusingstrengthcontrolledconstitutivemodelsthecaseoftheleaningtowerofpisassubsoil
AT stefanostacul onedimensionalnonlinearseismicresponseanalysisusingstrengthcontrolledconstitutivemodelsthecaseoftheleaningtowerofpisassubsoil
_version_ 1725230255913828352