Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts

With decreasing threat ambiguity and increasing threat imminence, human psychophysiological responses can be mapped onto a defensive continuum that distinguishes between the states of general anxiety, cued anxiety, and fear. The present study aimed to investigate whether self–reported physiological,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meike Pappens, Laurence Claes, Tine Versleegers, Debora Vansteenwegen, Omer Van den Bergh, Ilse Van Diest
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Rijeka 2013-09-01
Series:Psychological Topics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pt.ffri.hr/index.php/pt/article/view/141
id doaj-633435f472e5417f85eff56c0baf9834
record_format Article
spelling doaj-633435f472e5417f85eff56c0baf98342020-11-24T23:59:53ZengUniversity of RijekaPsychological Topics1332-07422013-09-01222221236Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational ScriptsMeike PappensLaurence ClaesTine VersleegersDebora VansteenwegenOmer Van den BerghIlse Van DiestWith decreasing threat ambiguity and increasing threat imminence, human psychophysiological responses can be mapped onto a defensive continuum that distinguishes between the states of general anxiety, cued anxiety, and fear. The present study aimed to investigate whether self–reported physiological, cognitive, behavioral and attentional responses can also distinguish between cued anxiety and fear. Healthy participants (N=141) received 9 situational scripts (3 prototypical scripts per phase of the defensive continuum) each followed by 22 responses. They indicated how likely they would display each response in the described situation. The results of an INDCLAS–analysis indicated that the distinction between "cued anxiety" and "fear" can be made on the basis of self–reported responses. Responses typical for fear situations were "fear of dying", "breathing faster", and "feeling of choking". Cued anxiety situations evoked "accelerated heart rate", "to startle", "sharpened senses", "tense muscles" and "sweating". This finding may contribute to constructing an easy tool to distinguish cued anxiety and fear in both clinical and experimental contexts.http://pt.ffri.hr/index.php/pt/article/view/141human defensive behavioranxietyfearself–reportpsychophysiological responses
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Meike Pappens
Laurence Claes
Tine Versleegers
Debora Vansteenwegen
Omer Van den Bergh
Ilse Van Diest
spellingShingle Meike Pappens
Laurence Claes
Tine Versleegers
Debora Vansteenwegen
Omer Van den Bergh
Ilse Van Diest
Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts
Psychological Topics
human defensive behavior
anxiety
fear
self–report
psychophysiological responses
author_facet Meike Pappens
Laurence Claes
Tine Versleegers
Debora Vansteenwegen
Omer Van den Bergh
Ilse Van Diest
author_sort Meike Pappens
title Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts
title_short Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts
title_full Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts
title_fullStr Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts
title_full_unstemmed Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts
title_sort disentangling fear and anxiety in self–reported responses to situational scripts
publisher University of Rijeka
series Psychological Topics
issn 1332-0742
publishDate 2013-09-01
description With decreasing threat ambiguity and increasing threat imminence, human psychophysiological responses can be mapped onto a defensive continuum that distinguishes between the states of general anxiety, cued anxiety, and fear. The present study aimed to investigate whether self–reported physiological, cognitive, behavioral and attentional responses can also distinguish between cued anxiety and fear. Healthy participants (N=141) received 9 situational scripts (3 prototypical scripts per phase of the defensive continuum) each followed by 22 responses. They indicated how likely they would display each response in the described situation. The results of an INDCLAS–analysis indicated that the distinction between "cued anxiety" and "fear" can be made on the basis of self–reported responses. Responses typical for fear situations were "fear of dying", "breathing faster", and "feeling of choking". Cued anxiety situations evoked "accelerated heart rate", "to startle", "sharpened senses", "tense muscles" and "sweating". This finding may contribute to constructing an easy tool to distinguish cued anxiety and fear in both clinical and experimental contexts.
topic human defensive behavior
anxiety
fear
self–report
psychophysiological responses
url http://pt.ffri.hr/index.php/pt/article/view/141
work_keys_str_mv AT meikepappens disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts
AT laurenceclaes disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts
AT tineversleegers disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts
AT deboravansteenwegen disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts
AT omervandenbergh disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts
AT ilsevandiest disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts
_version_ 1725445743000420352