Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts
With decreasing threat ambiguity and increasing threat imminence, human psychophysiological responses can be mapped onto a defensive continuum that distinguishes between the states of general anxiety, cued anxiety, and fear. The present study aimed to investigate whether self–reported physiological,...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Rijeka
2013-09-01
|
Series: | Psychological Topics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pt.ffri.hr/index.php/pt/article/view/141 |
id |
doaj-633435f472e5417f85eff56c0baf9834 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-633435f472e5417f85eff56c0baf98342020-11-24T23:59:53ZengUniversity of RijekaPsychological Topics1332-07422013-09-01222221236Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational ScriptsMeike PappensLaurence ClaesTine VersleegersDebora VansteenwegenOmer Van den BerghIlse Van DiestWith decreasing threat ambiguity and increasing threat imminence, human psychophysiological responses can be mapped onto a defensive continuum that distinguishes between the states of general anxiety, cued anxiety, and fear. The present study aimed to investigate whether self–reported physiological, cognitive, behavioral and attentional responses can also distinguish between cued anxiety and fear. Healthy participants (N=141) received 9 situational scripts (3 prototypical scripts per phase of the defensive continuum) each followed by 22 responses. They indicated how likely they would display each response in the described situation. The results of an INDCLAS–analysis indicated that the distinction between "cued anxiety" and "fear" can be made on the basis of self–reported responses. Responses typical for fear situations were "fear of dying", "breathing faster", and "feeling of choking". Cued anxiety situations evoked "accelerated heart rate", "to startle", "sharpened senses", "tense muscles" and "sweating". This finding may contribute to constructing an easy tool to distinguish cued anxiety and fear in both clinical and experimental contexts.http://pt.ffri.hr/index.php/pt/article/view/141human defensive behavioranxietyfearself–reportpsychophysiological responses |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Meike Pappens Laurence Claes Tine Versleegers Debora Vansteenwegen Omer Van den Bergh Ilse Van Diest |
spellingShingle |
Meike Pappens Laurence Claes Tine Versleegers Debora Vansteenwegen Omer Van den Bergh Ilse Van Diest Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts Psychological Topics human defensive behavior anxiety fear self–report psychophysiological responses |
author_facet |
Meike Pappens Laurence Claes Tine Versleegers Debora Vansteenwegen Omer Van den Bergh Ilse Van Diest |
author_sort |
Meike Pappens |
title |
Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts |
title_short |
Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts |
title_full |
Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts |
title_fullStr |
Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Disentangling Fear and Anxiety in Self–reported Responses to Situational Scripts |
title_sort |
disentangling fear and anxiety in self–reported responses to situational scripts |
publisher |
University of Rijeka |
series |
Psychological Topics |
issn |
1332-0742 |
publishDate |
2013-09-01 |
description |
With decreasing threat ambiguity and increasing threat imminence, human psychophysiological responses can be mapped onto a defensive continuum that distinguishes between the states of general anxiety, cued anxiety, and fear. The present study aimed to investigate whether self–reported physiological, cognitive, behavioral and attentional responses can also distinguish between cued anxiety and fear. Healthy participants (N=141) received 9 situational scripts (3 prototypical scripts per phase of the defensive continuum) each followed by 22 responses. They indicated how likely they would display each response in the described situation. The results of an INDCLAS–analysis indicated that the distinction between "cued anxiety" and "fear" can be made on the basis of self–reported responses. Responses typical for fear situations were "fear of dying", "breathing faster", and "feeling of choking". Cued anxiety situations evoked "accelerated heart rate", "to startle", "sharpened senses", "tense muscles" and "sweating". This finding may contribute to constructing an easy tool to distinguish cued anxiety and fear in both clinical and experimental contexts. |
topic |
human defensive behavior anxiety fear self–report psychophysiological responses |
url |
http://pt.ffri.hr/index.php/pt/article/view/141 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT meikepappens disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts AT laurenceclaes disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts AT tineversleegers disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts AT deboravansteenwegen disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts AT omervandenbergh disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts AT ilsevandiest disentanglingfearandanxietyinselfreportedresponsestosituationalscripts |
_version_ |
1725445743000420352 |