Tweedracht maakt macht. De PvdA, de doorbraak en de ontluikende polarisatiestrategie (1946-1966)

Divide and Rule: The Dutch Labour Party (PvdA), the Breakthrough and the Emerging Polarisation Strategy (1946-1966) In 1966, after a lengthy debate in the Dutch parliament, the Cals cabinet came to a sudden end. As a motion proposed by Norbert Schmelzer, the parliamentary leader of the prime ministe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: B. Mellink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Journals 2011-01-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojstest.minions.amsterdam/article/view/5725
id doaj-634cae3043204aee94cfff96da5300a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-634cae3043204aee94cfff96da5300a92021-10-02T15:16:59ZengOpen JournalsBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982011-01-011262Tweedracht maakt macht. De PvdA, de doorbraak en de ontluikende polarisatiestrategie (1946-1966)B. MellinkDivide and Rule: The Dutch Labour Party (PvdA), the Breakthrough and the Emerging Polarisation Strategy (1946-1966) In 1966, after a lengthy debate in the Dutch parliament, the Cals cabinet came to a sudden end. As a motion proposed by Norbert Schmelzer, the parliamentary leader of the prime minister’s own Catholic party precipitated the cabinet’s fall, ‘Schmelzer’s Night’ received an iconic status in Dutch political history. Many historians have interpreted Schmelzer’s Night as the birth of a Social Democratic ‘polarisation strategy’: differences between Left and Right were exaggerated in order to divide the confessional parties along ideological lines. Established analyses ascribe the development of this polarisation strategy to the ascendancy of a younger generation in Dutch politics. This article argues instead that the polarisation strategy of the late 1960s was not so much caused by a new generation, but rather emerged as a consequence of postwar Social Democrats’ efforts to abolish pillarisation (verzuiling) in Dutch society. https://ojstest.minions.amsterdam/article/view/5725Political partiespolitical cultureSocial Democracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. Mellink
spellingShingle B. Mellink
Tweedracht maakt macht. De PvdA, de doorbraak en de ontluikende polarisatiestrategie (1946-1966)
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Political parties
political culture
Social Democracy
author_facet B. Mellink
author_sort B. Mellink
title Tweedracht maakt macht. De PvdA, de doorbraak en de ontluikende polarisatiestrategie (1946-1966)
title_short Tweedracht maakt macht. De PvdA, de doorbraak en de ontluikende polarisatiestrategie (1946-1966)
title_full Tweedracht maakt macht. De PvdA, de doorbraak en de ontluikende polarisatiestrategie (1946-1966)
title_fullStr Tweedracht maakt macht. De PvdA, de doorbraak en de ontluikende polarisatiestrategie (1946-1966)
title_full_unstemmed Tweedracht maakt macht. De PvdA, de doorbraak en de ontluikende polarisatiestrategie (1946-1966)
title_sort tweedracht maakt macht. de pvda, de doorbraak en de ontluikende polarisatiestrategie (1946-1966)
publisher Open Journals
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Divide and Rule: The Dutch Labour Party (PvdA), the Breakthrough and the Emerging Polarisation Strategy (1946-1966) In 1966, after a lengthy debate in the Dutch parliament, the Cals cabinet came to a sudden end. As a motion proposed by Norbert Schmelzer, the parliamentary leader of the prime minister’s own Catholic party precipitated the cabinet’s fall, ‘Schmelzer’s Night’ received an iconic status in Dutch political history. Many historians have interpreted Schmelzer’s Night as the birth of a Social Democratic ‘polarisation strategy’: differences between Left and Right were exaggerated in order to divide the confessional parties along ideological lines. Established analyses ascribe the development of this polarisation strategy to the ascendancy of a younger generation in Dutch politics. This article argues instead that the polarisation strategy of the late 1960s was not so much caused by a new generation, but rather emerged as a consequence of postwar Social Democrats’ efforts to abolish pillarisation (verzuiling) in Dutch society.
topic Political parties
political culture
Social Democracy
url https://ojstest.minions.amsterdam/article/view/5725
work_keys_str_mv AT bmellink tweedrachtmaaktmachtdepvdadedoorbraakendeontluikendepolarisatiestrategie19461966
_version_ 1716854266039107584