Family Firms and Innovation from Founder to Successor

Several empirical investigations indicate that family firms are more innovative under the founding generation’s leadership and become less innovative in later stages, while others state the opposite. Within this debate, limited attention has been devoted to understanding how intra-family succession...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesca Maria Cesaroni, Gail Denisse Chamochumbi Diaz, Annalisa Sentuti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/2/54
id doaj-63719238b26648c1bf1d7ddaf09629c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63719238b26648c1bf1d7ddaf09629c12021-06-01T01:03:03ZengMDPI AGAdministrative Sciences2076-33872021-05-0111545410.3390/admsci11020054Family Firms and Innovation from Founder to SuccessorFrancesca Maria Cesaroni0Gail Denisse Chamochumbi Diaz1Annalisa Sentuti2Department of Economics, Society, Politics, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino, ItalyDepartment of Economics, Society, Politics, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino, ItalyDepartment of Economics, Society, Politics, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino, ItalySeveral empirical investigations indicate that family firms are more innovative under the founding generation’s leadership and become less innovative in later stages, while others state the opposite. Within this debate, limited attention has been devoted to understanding how intra-family succession might be an opportunity to maintain or improve family firms’ innovativeness. This paper aims to explore how family firms’ innovativeness may evolve from the first to the second generation and understand which conditions may favour or hamper this change. A qualitative approach based on a multiple case study was adopted, conducting seven face-to-face semi-structured interviews with founders and successors that formed the basis of four case studies. The results reveal four different dynamics that characterise how a first-generation family firm’s innovation capacities are or are not passed on to the second generation: decline, transformation, consolidation and preservation. Findings also show that these dynamics depend on the founders and successors’ approaches towards innovation. To better depict differences between them, we propose a typology of founders (lone innovator, collaborative innovator and orchestrator innovator) and successors (prodigal son, game changer, talent scout, faithful disciple) and explain how they influence the evolution of innovation from the founder generation to the next.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/2/54family firminnovativenessintra-family successionfoundersuccessorfirst and second generations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesca Maria Cesaroni
Gail Denisse Chamochumbi Diaz
Annalisa Sentuti
spellingShingle Francesca Maria Cesaroni
Gail Denisse Chamochumbi Diaz
Annalisa Sentuti
Family Firms and Innovation from Founder to Successor
Administrative Sciences
family firm
innovativeness
intra-family succession
founder
successor
first and second generations
author_facet Francesca Maria Cesaroni
Gail Denisse Chamochumbi Diaz
Annalisa Sentuti
author_sort Francesca Maria Cesaroni
title Family Firms and Innovation from Founder to Successor
title_short Family Firms and Innovation from Founder to Successor
title_full Family Firms and Innovation from Founder to Successor
title_fullStr Family Firms and Innovation from Founder to Successor
title_full_unstemmed Family Firms and Innovation from Founder to Successor
title_sort family firms and innovation from founder to successor
publisher MDPI AG
series Administrative Sciences
issn 2076-3387
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Several empirical investigations indicate that family firms are more innovative under the founding generation’s leadership and become less innovative in later stages, while others state the opposite. Within this debate, limited attention has been devoted to understanding how intra-family succession might be an opportunity to maintain or improve family firms’ innovativeness. This paper aims to explore how family firms’ innovativeness may evolve from the first to the second generation and understand which conditions may favour or hamper this change. A qualitative approach based on a multiple case study was adopted, conducting seven face-to-face semi-structured interviews with founders and successors that formed the basis of four case studies. The results reveal four different dynamics that characterise how a first-generation family firm’s innovation capacities are or are not passed on to the second generation: decline, transformation, consolidation and preservation. Findings also show that these dynamics depend on the founders and successors’ approaches towards innovation. To better depict differences between them, we propose a typology of founders (lone innovator, collaborative innovator and orchestrator innovator) and successors (prodigal son, game changer, talent scout, faithful disciple) and explain how they influence the evolution of innovation from the founder generation to the next.
topic family firm
innovativeness
intra-family succession
founder
successor
first and second generations
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/2/54
work_keys_str_mv AT francescamariacesaroni familyfirmsandinnovationfromfoundertosuccessor
AT gaildenissechamochumbidiaz familyfirmsandinnovationfromfoundertosuccessor
AT annalisasentuti familyfirmsandinnovationfromfoundertosuccessor
_version_ 1721413193931161600