The Use of Reflective Pedagogies in Sustainability Leadership Education—A Case Study

This study aims to examine the use of reflective pedagogies in sustainability leadership education by investigating two specific pedagogical tools—the Portfolio and Pod—employed by the Master’s in Strategic Leadership towards Sustainability (MSLS) program at Blekinge Institute of Technology in Karls...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Ayers, Jayne Bryant, Merlina Missimer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6726
id doaj-63a404948d244c898f5df386569b6e38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63a404948d244c898f5df386569b6e382020-11-25T03:54:35ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-08-01126726672610.3390/su12176726The Use of Reflective Pedagogies in Sustainability Leadership Education—A Case StudyJames Ayers0Jayne Bryant1Merlina Missimer2Department of Strategic Sustainable Development (TISU), Blekinge Institute of Technology, SE-371 79 Karlskrona, SwedenDepartment of Strategic Sustainable Development (TISU), Blekinge Institute of Technology, SE-371 79 Karlskrona, SwedenDepartment of Strategic Sustainable Development (TISU), Blekinge Institute of Technology, SE-371 79 Karlskrona, SwedenThis study aims to examine the use of reflective pedagogies in sustainability leadership education by investigating two specific pedagogical tools—the Portfolio and Pod—employed by the Master’s in Strategic Leadership towards Sustainability (MSLS) program at Blekinge Institute of Technology in Karlskrona, Sweden. The study analyzed data gathered from student surveys, teacher interviews, and staff reflections to determine the benefits and challenges faced by students and staff in implementing and engaging with these pedagogical tools. Benefits include the provision of distinct structures to guide student reflection towards individual skill development and the use of collective reflection to encourage generative dialogue between students and staff. This holds benefits for collaboration, self-awareness, understanding of multiple perspectives, and creating self-directed graduates. Staff and students also, however, suggest a number of challenges. These include the ‘constrictive’ nature of guided reflection and the emotional and mental load faced by staff in hosting and holding students through often challenging personal reflective processes. For the potential of reflective pedagogies to be truly realized for Education for Sustainable Development in higher education institutions need to develop an understanding of the impacts that reflective pedagogies have on students and teachers and create institutional structures to support them.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6726sustainabilitypedagogyreflective learninghigher educationleadership
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Ayers
Jayne Bryant
Merlina Missimer
spellingShingle James Ayers
Jayne Bryant
Merlina Missimer
The Use of Reflective Pedagogies in Sustainability Leadership Education—A Case Study
Sustainability
sustainability
pedagogy
reflective learning
higher education
leadership
author_facet James Ayers
Jayne Bryant
Merlina Missimer
author_sort James Ayers
title The Use of Reflective Pedagogies in Sustainability Leadership Education—A Case Study
title_short The Use of Reflective Pedagogies in Sustainability Leadership Education—A Case Study
title_full The Use of Reflective Pedagogies in Sustainability Leadership Education—A Case Study
title_fullStr The Use of Reflective Pedagogies in Sustainability Leadership Education—A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Reflective Pedagogies in Sustainability Leadership Education—A Case Study
title_sort use of reflective pedagogies in sustainability leadership education—a case study
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-08-01
description This study aims to examine the use of reflective pedagogies in sustainability leadership education by investigating two specific pedagogical tools—the Portfolio and Pod—employed by the Master’s in Strategic Leadership towards Sustainability (MSLS) program at Blekinge Institute of Technology in Karlskrona, Sweden. The study analyzed data gathered from student surveys, teacher interviews, and staff reflections to determine the benefits and challenges faced by students and staff in implementing and engaging with these pedagogical tools. Benefits include the provision of distinct structures to guide student reflection towards individual skill development and the use of collective reflection to encourage generative dialogue between students and staff. This holds benefits for collaboration, self-awareness, understanding of multiple perspectives, and creating self-directed graduates. Staff and students also, however, suggest a number of challenges. These include the ‘constrictive’ nature of guided reflection and the emotional and mental load faced by staff in hosting and holding students through often challenging personal reflective processes. For the potential of reflective pedagogies to be truly realized for Education for Sustainable Development in higher education institutions need to develop an understanding of the impacts that reflective pedagogies have on students and teachers and create institutional structures to support them.
topic sustainability
pedagogy
reflective learning
higher education
leadership
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6726
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesayers theuseofreflectivepedagogiesinsustainabilityleadershipeducationacasestudy
AT jaynebryant theuseofreflectivepedagogiesinsustainabilityleadershipeducationacasestudy
AT merlinamissimer theuseofreflectivepedagogiesinsustainabilityleadershipeducationacasestudy
AT jamesayers useofreflectivepedagogiesinsustainabilityleadershipeducationacasestudy
AT jaynebryant useofreflectivepedagogiesinsustainabilityleadershipeducationacasestudy
AT merlinamissimer useofreflectivepedagogiesinsustainabilityleadershipeducationacasestudy
_version_ 1724472929665679360