Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.

This paper will describe the seismic behaviour of masonry infilled RC frame with a central opening structure under reversed cyclic lateral loading. To achieve the purpose of this study, four 1/4-scale single story and single bay RC frame specimens were tested, i.e. one bare frame, one clay brick mas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maidiawati, Tanjung Jafril, Hayatfi Yulia, Medriosa Hamdeni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925805009
id doaj-63ad02c49254413eb727ae533b4a3cd2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63ad02c49254413eb727ae533b4a3cd22021-02-02T08:46:48ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2019-01-012580500910.1051/matecconf/201925805009matecconf_scescm2019_05009Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.Maidiawati0Tanjung Jafril1Hayatfi Yulia2Medriosa Hamdeni3Civil Engineering Department, Padang Institute of TechnologyCivil Engineering Department, Andalas UniversityCivil Engineering Department, Syiah Kuala UniversityCivil Engineering Department, Padang Institute of TechnologyThis paper will describe the seismic behaviour of masonry infilled RC frame with a central opening structure under reversed cyclic lateral loading. To achieve the purpose of this study, four 1/4-scale single story and single bay RC frame specimens were tested, i.e. one bare frame, one clay brick masonry infilled RC frame without opening and two clay brick masonry infills with a central opening in infills. The ratios of opening size to panel area were 25% and 40%. Through reversed cyclic lateral loading tests, the seismic performance of RC frames with a central opening brick masonry infills was investigated. As the results, significant distinctions of failure mechanism, lateral strength, stiffness, and ductility were observed between these specimens. In the case of infills with a central opening, the cracks sprouted and developed at the corners of the opening. Although the presence of the opening in infill reduces the lateral strength and stiffness overall structure, the brick infilled frames with a central opening of 25% and 40% of panel area show better seismic performance as compared to the bare frame.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925805009
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maidiawati
Tanjung Jafril
Hayatfi Yulia
Medriosa Hamdeni
spellingShingle Maidiawati
Tanjung Jafril
Hayatfi Yulia
Medriosa Hamdeni
Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Maidiawati
Tanjung Jafril
Hayatfi Yulia
Medriosa Hamdeni
author_sort Maidiawati
title Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.
title_short Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.
title_full Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.
title_fullStr Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.
title_full_unstemmed Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.
title_sort behaviour of reinforced concrete frames with central opening masonry infill under lateral reversed cyclic loading.
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This paper will describe the seismic behaviour of masonry infilled RC frame with a central opening structure under reversed cyclic lateral loading. To achieve the purpose of this study, four 1/4-scale single story and single bay RC frame specimens were tested, i.e. one bare frame, one clay brick masonry infilled RC frame without opening and two clay brick masonry infills with a central opening in infills. The ratios of opening size to panel area were 25% and 40%. Through reversed cyclic lateral loading tests, the seismic performance of RC frames with a central opening brick masonry infills was investigated. As the results, significant distinctions of failure mechanism, lateral strength, stiffness, and ductility were observed between these specimens. In the case of infills with a central opening, the cracks sprouted and developed at the corners of the opening. Although the presence of the opening in infill reduces the lateral strength and stiffness overall structure, the brick infilled frames with a central opening of 25% and 40% of panel area show better seismic performance as compared to the bare frame.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925805009
work_keys_str_mv AT maidiawati behaviourofreinforcedconcreteframeswithcentralopeningmasonryinfillunderlateralreversedcyclicloading
AT tanjungjafril behaviourofreinforcedconcreteframeswithcentralopeningmasonryinfillunderlateralreversedcyclicloading
AT hayatfiyulia behaviourofreinforcedconcreteframeswithcentralopeningmasonryinfillunderlateralreversedcyclicloading
AT medriosahamdeni behaviourofreinforcedconcreteframeswithcentralopeningmasonryinfillunderlateralreversedcyclicloading
_version_ 1724296462985068544