Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.
This paper will describe the seismic behaviour of masonry infilled RC frame with a central opening structure under reversed cyclic lateral loading. To achieve the purpose of this study, four 1/4-scale single story and single bay RC frame specimens were tested, i.e. one bare frame, one clay brick mas...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2019-01-01
|
Series: | MATEC Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925805009 |
id |
doaj-63ad02c49254413eb727ae533b4a3cd2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-63ad02c49254413eb727ae533b4a3cd22021-02-02T08:46:48ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2019-01-012580500910.1051/matecconf/201925805009matecconf_scescm2019_05009Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.Maidiawati0Tanjung Jafril1Hayatfi Yulia2Medriosa Hamdeni3Civil Engineering Department, Padang Institute of TechnologyCivil Engineering Department, Andalas UniversityCivil Engineering Department, Syiah Kuala UniversityCivil Engineering Department, Padang Institute of TechnologyThis paper will describe the seismic behaviour of masonry infilled RC frame with a central opening structure under reversed cyclic lateral loading. To achieve the purpose of this study, four 1/4-scale single story and single bay RC frame specimens were tested, i.e. one bare frame, one clay brick masonry infilled RC frame without opening and two clay brick masonry infills with a central opening in infills. The ratios of opening size to panel area were 25% and 40%. Through reversed cyclic lateral loading tests, the seismic performance of RC frames with a central opening brick masonry infills was investigated. As the results, significant distinctions of failure mechanism, lateral strength, stiffness, and ductility were observed between these specimens. In the case of infills with a central opening, the cracks sprouted and developed at the corners of the opening. Although the presence of the opening in infill reduces the lateral strength and stiffness overall structure, the brick infilled frames with a central opening of 25% and 40% of panel area show better seismic performance as compared to the bare frame.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925805009 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maidiawati Tanjung Jafril Hayatfi Yulia Medriosa Hamdeni |
spellingShingle |
Maidiawati Tanjung Jafril Hayatfi Yulia Medriosa Hamdeni Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading. MATEC Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Maidiawati Tanjung Jafril Hayatfi Yulia Medriosa Hamdeni |
author_sort |
Maidiawati |
title |
Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading. |
title_short |
Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading. |
title_full |
Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading. |
title_fullStr |
Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading. |
title_sort |
behaviour of reinforced concrete frames with central opening masonry infill under lateral reversed cyclic loading. |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
MATEC Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-236X |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
This paper will describe the seismic behaviour of masonry infilled RC frame with a central opening structure under reversed cyclic lateral loading. To achieve the purpose of this study, four 1/4-scale single story and single bay RC frame specimens were tested, i.e. one bare frame, one clay brick masonry infilled RC frame without opening and two clay brick masonry infills with a central opening in infills. The ratios of opening size to panel area were 25% and 40%. Through reversed cyclic lateral loading tests, the seismic performance of RC frames with a central opening brick masonry infills was investigated. As the results, significant distinctions of failure mechanism, lateral strength, stiffness, and ductility were observed between these specimens. In the case of infills with a central opening, the cracks sprouted and developed at the corners of the opening. Although the presence of the opening in infill reduces the lateral strength and stiffness overall structure, the brick infilled frames with a central opening of 25% and 40% of panel area show better seismic performance as compared to the bare frame. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925805009 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maidiawati behaviourofreinforcedconcreteframeswithcentralopeningmasonryinfillunderlateralreversedcyclicloading AT tanjungjafril behaviourofreinforcedconcreteframeswithcentralopeningmasonryinfillunderlateralreversedcyclicloading AT hayatfiyulia behaviourofreinforcedconcreteframeswithcentralopeningmasonryinfillunderlateralreversedcyclicloading AT medriosahamdeni behaviourofreinforcedconcreteframeswithcentralopeningmasonryinfillunderlateralreversedcyclicloading |
_version_ |
1724296462985068544 |