Impact of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.

BACKGROUND:ABO incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KT) is an important approach for overcoming donor shortages. We evaluated the effect of ABOi-KT on living donor KT. METHODS:Two nationwide transplantation databases were used. We evaluated the impact of ABOi-KT on overall living donor transpla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ji Hyun Yu, Byung Ha Chung, Chul Woo Yang, Korean Organ Transplantation Registry Study Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5360260?pdf=render
id doaj-63b1f4bf962449c8b860ee6ca321a326
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63b1f4bf962449c8b860ee6ca321a3262020-11-24T21:40:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01123e017387810.1371/journal.pone.0173878Impact of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.Ji Hyun YuByung Ha ChungChul Woo YangKorean Organ Transplantation Registry Study GroupBACKGROUND:ABO incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KT) is an important approach for overcoming donor shortages. We evaluated the effect of ABOi-KT on living donor KT. METHODS:Two nationwide transplantation databases were used. We evaluated the impact of ABOi-KT on overall living donor transplant activity and spousal donation as subgroup analysis. In addition, we compared the clinical outcome between ABOi-KT and ABO compatible KT (ABOc-KT) from spousal donor, and performed a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to define the risk factors affecting the allograft outcomes. RESULT:The introduction of ABOi-KT increased overall living donor KT by 12.2% and its portion was increased from 0.3% to 21.7% during study period. The ABOi-KT in living unrelated KT was two times higher than that of living related donor KT (17.8 vs.9.8%). Spousal donor was a major portion of living unrelated KT (77.6%) and ABOi-KT increased spousal donation from 10% to 31.5% in living donor KT. In addition, increasing rate ABOi-KT from spousal donor was 10 times higher than that of living related donor. The clinical outcome (incidence of acute rejection, allograft function, and allograft and patient survival rates) of ABOi-KT from spousal donor was comparable to that of ABOc-KT. Neither ABO incompatibility nor spousal donor was associated with acute rejection or allograft failure on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS:ABOi-KT increased overall living donor KT, and ABOi-KT from spousal donor is rapidly increasing with favorable clinical outcomes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5360260?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ji Hyun Yu
Byung Ha Chung
Chul Woo Yang
Korean Organ Transplantation Registry Study Group
spellingShingle Ji Hyun Yu
Byung Ha Chung
Chul Woo Yang
Korean Organ Transplantation Registry Study Group
Impact of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ji Hyun Yu
Byung Ha Chung
Chul Woo Yang
Korean Organ Transplantation Registry Study Group
author_sort Ji Hyun Yu
title Impact of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.
title_short Impact of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.
title_full Impact of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.
title_fullStr Impact of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.
title_full_unstemmed Impact of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.
title_sort impact of abo incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description BACKGROUND:ABO incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KT) is an important approach for overcoming donor shortages. We evaluated the effect of ABOi-KT on living donor KT. METHODS:Two nationwide transplantation databases were used. We evaluated the impact of ABOi-KT on overall living donor transplant activity and spousal donation as subgroup analysis. In addition, we compared the clinical outcome between ABOi-KT and ABO compatible KT (ABOc-KT) from spousal donor, and performed a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to define the risk factors affecting the allograft outcomes. RESULT:The introduction of ABOi-KT increased overall living donor KT by 12.2% and its portion was increased from 0.3% to 21.7% during study period. The ABOi-KT in living unrelated KT was two times higher than that of living related donor KT (17.8 vs.9.8%). Spousal donor was a major portion of living unrelated KT (77.6%) and ABOi-KT increased spousal donation from 10% to 31.5% in living donor KT. In addition, increasing rate ABOi-KT from spousal donor was 10 times higher than that of living related donor. The clinical outcome (incidence of acute rejection, allograft function, and allograft and patient survival rates) of ABOi-KT from spousal donor was comparable to that of ABOc-KT. Neither ABO incompatibility nor spousal donor was associated with acute rejection or allograft failure on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS:ABOi-KT increased overall living donor KT, and ABOi-KT from spousal donor is rapidly increasing with favorable clinical outcomes.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5360260?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jihyunyu impactofaboincompatiblekidneytransplantationonlivingdonortransplantation
AT byunghachung impactofaboincompatiblekidneytransplantationonlivingdonortransplantation
AT chulwooyang impactofaboincompatiblekidneytransplantationonlivingdonortransplantation
AT koreanorgantransplantationregistrystudygroup impactofaboincompatiblekidneytransplantationonlivingdonortransplantation
_version_ 1725924716863029248