Small-scale field evaluation of the efficacy and residual effect of Fludora® Fusion (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) against susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae populations from Benin, West Africa
Abstract Background In recognition of the threat of insecticide resistance in vectors of malaria, the WHO Global Malaria Programme recommends the development of an appropriate and comprehensive response to insecticide resistance. In principle, good resistance management practice requires the applica...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Malaria Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2633-6 |
id |
doaj-63b80459ff0d4a068d3baae4895a57dc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-63b80459ff0d4a068d3baae4895a57dc2020-11-25T01:11:34ZengBMCMalaria Journal1475-28752018-12-0117111010.1186/s12936-018-2633-6Small-scale field evaluation of the efficacy and residual effect of Fludora® Fusion (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) against susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae populations from Benin, West AfricaFiacre R. Agossa0Gil G. Padonou1Arsene Jacques Y. H. Fassinou2Esdras M. Odjo3Osei K. Akuoko4Albert Salako5Zinsou C. Koukpo6Udoka C. Nwangwu7Bruno Akinro8Michel Sezonlin9Martin C. Akogbeto10Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC)Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC)Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC)Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC)Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research UniversityCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC)Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC)National Arbovirus and Vectors Research Centre (NAVRC)Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC)Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC)Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC)Abstract Background In recognition of the threat of insecticide resistance in vectors of malaria, the WHO Global Malaria Programme recommends the development of an appropriate and comprehensive response to insecticide resistance. In principle, good resistance management practice requires the application of multiple insecticides of different modes of action, for example, in rotations and mixtures. Insecticides recommended by the World Health Organization for indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticide nets are limited. It is, therefore, judicious to prevent the rapid spread of insecticide resistance by evaluating new insecticides formulations with different modes of action and long residual effect. Methods Fludora® Fusion, a new neonicotinoid IRS formulation (a mixture of 500 g/kg clothianidin and 62.5 g/kg deltamethrin applied 200 mg ai/sqm + 25 mg ai/sqm, respectively) was tested. Small scale field evaluation of this product was conducted in the district of Dangbo in Benin, to compare its efficacy and residual effect on cement and mud walls against those of clothianidin 200 mg ai/sqm (WG 70) alone, and of deltamethrin 25 mg ai/sqm (WG 250) alone. WHO wall cone bioassays were conducted monthly with laboratory susceptible Anopheles “Kisumu” and wild Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) population from Dangbo. The induced mortality by each treatment per wall substrate for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h post exposure were recorded every month and analysed. Results Fludora® Fusion and clothianidin WG 70 showed mortality rates over 80% WHO bio-efficacy threshold on cement walls either with susceptible or resistant An. gambiae s.s. over a period of 10 and 9 months, respectively. Treatment with Fludora® Fusion and clothianidin WG 70 on the mud walls showed residual effect for 6 months and 5 months respectively against both susceptible and resistant mosquitoes. During the whole evaluation period, deltamethrin WG 250 showed mortality rates below 80% against resistant Anopheles population. Furthermore, the knock down rates observed with the Fludora® Fusion combination were significantly higher (p < 5%) than those induced by Clothiandin WG 70. Conclusion Both the Fludora® Fusion combination and clothianidin alone showed very good and lasting efficacy for IRS against resistant Anopheles with some residual benefit provided by the combination. The residual efficacy of the Fludora® Fusion combination evaluated at 10 months shows this product is a good candidate for IRS interventions.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2633-6Fludora® FusionClothianidinDeltamethrin Anopheles gambiaeEfficacyBenin |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fiacre R. Agossa Gil G. Padonou Arsene Jacques Y. H. Fassinou Esdras M. Odjo Osei K. Akuoko Albert Salako Zinsou C. Koukpo Udoka C. Nwangwu Bruno Akinro Michel Sezonlin Martin C. Akogbeto |
spellingShingle |
Fiacre R. Agossa Gil G. Padonou Arsene Jacques Y. H. Fassinou Esdras M. Odjo Osei K. Akuoko Albert Salako Zinsou C. Koukpo Udoka C. Nwangwu Bruno Akinro Michel Sezonlin Martin C. Akogbeto Small-scale field evaluation of the efficacy and residual effect of Fludora® Fusion (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) against susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae populations from Benin, West Africa Malaria Journal Fludora® Fusion Clothianidin Deltamethrin Anopheles gambiae Efficacy Benin |
author_facet |
Fiacre R. Agossa Gil G. Padonou Arsene Jacques Y. H. Fassinou Esdras M. Odjo Osei K. Akuoko Albert Salako Zinsou C. Koukpo Udoka C. Nwangwu Bruno Akinro Michel Sezonlin Martin C. Akogbeto |
author_sort |
Fiacre R. Agossa |
title |
Small-scale field evaluation of the efficacy and residual effect of Fludora® Fusion (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) against susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae populations from Benin, West Africa |
title_short |
Small-scale field evaluation of the efficacy and residual effect of Fludora® Fusion (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) against susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae populations from Benin, West Africa |
title_full |
Small-scale field evaluation of the efficacy and residual effect of Fludora® Fusion (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) against susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae populations from Benin, West Africa |
title_fullStr |
Small-scale field evaluation of the efficacy and residual effect of Fludora® Fusion (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) against susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae populations from Benin, West Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Small-scale field evaluation of the efficacy and residual effect of Fludora® Fusion (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) against susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae populations from Benin, West Africa |
title_sort |
small-scale field evaluation of the efficacy and residual effect of fludora® fusion (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) against susceptible and resistant anopheles gambiae populations from benin, west africa |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Malaria Journal |
issn |
1475-2875 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Background In recognition of the threat of insecticide resistance in vectors of malaria, the WHO Global Malaria Programme recommends the development of an appropriate and comprehensive response to insecticide resistance. In principle, good resistance management practice requires the application of multiple insecticides of different modes of action, for example, in rotations and mixtures. Insecticides recommended by the World Health Organization for indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticide nets are limited. It is, therefore, judicious to prevent the rapid spread of insecticide resistance by evaluating new insecticides formulations with different modes of action and long residual effect. Methods Fludora® Fusion, a new neonicotinoid IRS formulation (a mixture of 500 g/kg clothianidin and 62.5 g/kg deltamethrin applied 200 mg ai/sqm + 25 mg ai/sqm, respectively) was tested. Small scale field evaluation of this product was conducted in the district of Dangbo in Benin, to compare its efficacy and residual effect on cement and mud walls against those of clothianidin 200 mg ai/sqm (WG 70) alone, and of deltamethrin 25 mg ai/sqm (WG 250) alone. WHO wall cone bioassays were conducted monthly with laboratory susceptible Anopheles “Kisumu” and wild Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) population from Dangbo. The induced mortality by each treatment per wall substrate for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h post exposure were recorded every month and analysed. Results Fludora® Fusion and clothianidin WG 70 showed mortality rates over 80% WHO bio-efficacy threshold on cement walls either with susceptible or resistant An. gambiae s.s. over a period of 10 and 9 months, respectively. Treatment with Fludora® Fusion and clothianidin WG 70 on the mud walls showed residual effect for 6 months and 5 months respectively against both susceptible and resistant mosquitoes. During the whole evaluation period, deltamethrin WG 250 showed mortality rates below 80% against resistant Anopheles population. Furthermore, the knock down rates observed with the Fludora® Fusion combination were significantly higher (p < 5%) than those induced by Clothiandin WG 70. Conclusion Both the Fludora® Fusion combination and clothianidin alone showed very good and lasting efficacy for IRS against resistant Anopheles with some residual benefit provided by the combination. The residual efficacy of the Fludora® Fusion combination evaluated at 10 months shows this product is a good candidate for IRS interventions. |
topic |
Fludora® Fusion Clothianidin Deltamethrin Anopheles gambiae Efficacy Benin |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2633-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fiacreragossa smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica AT gilgpadonou smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica AT arsenejacquesyhfassinou smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica AT esdrasmodjo smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica AT oseikakuoko smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica AT albertsalako smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica AT zinsouckoukpo smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica AT udokacnwangwu smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica AT brunoakinro smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica AT michelsezonlin smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica AT martincakogbeto smallscalefieldevaluationoftheefficacyandresidualeffectoffludorafusionmixtureofclothianidinanddeltamethrinagainstsusceptibleandresistantanophelesgambiaepopulationsfrombeninwestafrica |
_version_ |
1725170879025905664 |