Effects of meal frequency on metabolic profiles and substrate partitioning in lean healthy males.

The daily number of meals has an effect on postprandial glucose and insulin responses, which may affect substrate partitioning and thus weight control. This study investigated the effects of meal frequency on 24 h profiles of metabolic markers and substrate partitioning.Twelve (BMI:21.6 ± 0.6 kg/m(2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marjet J M Munsters, Wim H M Saris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3374835?pdf=render
id doaj-63c49f48da8942f9af1951b65cfa93e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63c49f48da8942f9af1951b65cfa93e92020-11-24T22:05:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0176e3863210.1371/journal.pone.0038632Effects of meal frequency on metabolic profiles and substrate partitioning in lean healthy males.Marjet J M MunstersWim H M SarisThe daily number of meals has an effect on postprandial glucose and insulin responses, which may affect substrate partitioning and thus weight control. This study investigated the effects of meal frequency on 24 h profiles of metabolic markers and substrate partitioning.Twelve (BMI:21.6 ± 0.6 kg/m(2)) healthy male subjects stayed after 3 days of food intake and physical activity standardization 2 × 36 hours in a respiration chamber to measure substrate partitioning. All subjects randomly received two isoenergetic diets with a Low meal Frequency (3 ×; LFr) or a High meal Frequency (14 ×; HFr) consisting of 15 En% protein, 30 En% fat, and 55 En% carbohydrates. Blood was sampled at fixed time points during the day to measure metabolic markers and satiety hormones.Glucose and insulin profiles showed greater fluctuations, but a lower AUC of glucose in the LFr diet compared with the HFr diet. No differences between the frequency diets were observed on fat and carbohydrate oxidation. Though, protein oxidation and RMR (in this case SMR + DIT) were significantly increased in the LFr diet compared with the HFr diet. The LFr diet increased satiety and reduced hunger ratings compared with the HFr diet during the day.The higher rise and subsequently fall of insulin in the LFr diet did not lead to a higher fat oxidation as hypothesized. The LFr diet decreased glucose levels throughout the day (AUC) indicating glycemic improvements. RMR and appetite control increased in the LFr diet, which can be relevant for body weight control on the long term.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01034293.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3374835?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marjet J M Munsters
Wim H M Saris
spellingShingle Marjet J M Munsters
Wim H M Saris
Effects of meal frequency on metabolic profiles and substrate partitioning in lean healthy males.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Marjet J M Munsters
Wim H M Saris
author_sort Marjet J M Munsters
title Effects of meal frequency on metabolic profiles and substrate partitioning in lean healthy males.
title_short Effects of meal frequency on metabolic profiles and substrate partitioning in lean healthy males.
title_full Effects of meal frequency on metabolic profiles and substrate partitioning in lean healthy males.
title_fullStr Effects of meal frequency on metabolic profiles and substrate partitioning in lean healthy males.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of meal frequency on metabolic profiles and substrate partitioning in lean healthy males.
title_sort effects of meal frequency on metabolic profiles and substrate partitioning in lean healthy males.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The daily number of meals has an effect on postprandial glucose and insulin responses, which may affect substrate partitioning and thus weight control. This study investigated the effects of meal frequency on 24 h profiles of metabolic markers and substrate partitioning.Twelve (BMI:21.6 ± 0.6 kg/m(2)) healthy male subjects stayed after 3 days of food intake and physical activity standardization 2 × 36 hours in a respiration chamber to measure substrate partitioning. All subjects randomly received two isoenergetic diets with a Low meal Frequency (3 ×; LFr) or a High meal Frequency (14 ×; HFr) consisting of 15 En% protein, 30 En% fat, and 55 En% carbohydrates. Blood was sampled at fixed time points during the day to measure metabolic markers and satiety hormones.Glucose and insulin profiles showed greater fluctuations, but a lower AUC of glucose in the LFr diet compared with the HFr diet. No differences between the frequency diets were observed on fat and carbohydrate oxidation. Though, protein oxidation and RMR (in this case SMR + DIT) were significantly increased in the LFr diet compared with the HFr diet. The LFr diet increased satiety and reduced hunger ratings compared with the HFr diet during the day.The higher rise and subsequently fall of insulin in the LFr diet did not lead to a higher fat oxidation as hypothesized. The LFr diet decreased glucose levels throughout the day (AUC) indicating glycemic improvements. RMR and appetite control increased in the LFr diet, which can be relevant for body weight control on the long term.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01034293.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3374835?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT marjetjmmunsters effectsofmealfrequencyonmetabolicprofilesandsubstratepartitioninginleanhealthymales
AT wimhmsaris effectsofmealfrequencyonmetabolicprofilesandsubstratepartitioninginleanhealthymales
_version_ 1725824770363097088