Are Autonomous and Controlled Motivations School-Subjects-Specific?

This research sought to test whether autonomous and controlled motivations are specific to school subjects or more general to the school context. In two cross-sectional studies, 252 elementary school children (43.7% male; mean age = 10.7 years, SD = 1.3 years) and 334 junior high school children (49...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julien Chanal, Frédéric Guay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4527747?pdf=render
id doaj-640f72d3c66c4dc087f33e963dd16d0a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-640f72d3c66c4dc087f33e963dd16d0a2020-11-25T01:24:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01108e013466010.1371/journal.pone.0134660Are Autonomous and Controlled Motivations School-Subjects-Specific?Julien ChanalFrédéric GuayThis research sought to test whether autonomous and controlled motivations are specific to school subjects or more general to the school context. In two cross-sectional studies, 252 elementary school children (43.7% male; mean age = 10.7 years, SD = 1.3 years) and 334 junior high school children (49.7% male, mean age = 14.07 years, SD = 1.01 years) were administered a questionnaire assessing their motivation for various school subjects. Results based on structural equation modeling using the correlated trait-correlated method minus one model (CTCM-1) showed that autonomous and controlled motivations assessed at the school subject level are not equally school-subject-specific. We found larger specificity effects for autonomous (intrinsic and identified) than for controlled (introjected and external) motivation. In both studies, results of factor loadings and the correlations with self-concept and achievement demonstrated that more evidence of specificity was obtained for autonomous regulations than for controlled ones. These findings suggest a new understanding of the hierarchical and multidimensional academic structure of autonomous and controlled motivations and of the mechanisms involved in the development of types of regulations for school subjects.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4527747?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julien Chanal
Frédéric Guay
spellingShingle Julien Chanal
Frédéric Guay
Are Autonomous and Controlled Motivations School-Subjects-Specific?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Julien Chanal
Frédéric Guay
author_sort Julien Chanal
title Are Autonomous and Controlled Motivations School-Subjects-Specific?
title_short Are Autonomous and Controlled Motivations School-Subjects-Specific?
title_full Are Autonomous and Controlled Motivations School-Subjects-Specific?
title_fullStr Are Autonomous and Controlled Motivations School-Subjects-Specific?
title_full_unstemmed Are Autonomous and Controlled Motivations School-Subjects-Specific?
title_sort are autonomous and controlled motivations school-subjects-specific?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description This research sought to test whether autonomous and controlled motivations are specific to school subjects or more general to the school context. In two cross-sectional studies, 252 elementary school children (43.7% male; mean age = 10.7 years, SD = 1.3 years) and 334 junior high school children (49.7% male, mean age = 14.07 years, SD = 1.01 years) were administered a questionnaire assessing their motivation for various school subjects. Results based on structural equation modeling using the correlated trait-correlated method minus one model (CTCM-1) showed that autonomous and controlled motivations assessed at the school subject level are not equally school-subject-specific. We found larger specificity effects for autonomous (intrinsic and identified) than for controlled (introjected and external) motivation. In both studies, results of factor loadings and the correlations with self-concept and achievement demonstrated that more evidence of specificity was obtained for autonomous regulations than for controlled ones. These findings suggest a new understanding of the hierarchical and multidimensional academic structure of autonomous and controlled motivations and of the mechanisms involved in the development of types of regulations for school subjects.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4527747?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT julienchanal areautonomousandcontrolledmotivationsschoolsubjectsspecific
AT fredericguay areautonomousandcontrolledmotivationsschoolsubjectsspecific
_version_ 1725118488864882688