Evidence for Individual Face Discrimination in Non-Face Selective Areas of the Visual Cortex in Acquired Prosopagnosia

Two areas in the human occipito-temporal cortex respond preferentially to faces: ‘the fusiform face area’ (‘FFA’) and the ‘occipital face area’ (‘OFA’). However, it is unclear whether these areas have an exclusive role in processing faces, or if sub-maximal responses in other visual areas such as th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laurence Dricot, Bettina Sorger, Christine Schiltz, Rainer Goebel, Bruno Rossion
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2008-01-01
Series:Behavioural Neurology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/561476
id doaj-64b1be52c3c7478b91a432fc6c66b466
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64b1be52c3c7478b91a432fc6c66b4662021-07-02T05:57:07ZengHindawi LimitedBehavioural Neurology0953-41801875-85842008-01-01191-2757910.1155/2008/561476Evidence for Individual Face Discrimination in Non-Face Selective Areas of the Visual Cortex in Acquired ProsopagnosiaLaurence Dricot0Bettina Sorger1Christine Schiltz2Rainer Goebel3Bruno Rossion4Department of Neurophysiology, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Neurophysiology, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Neurophysiology, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumTwo areas in the human occipito-temporal cortex respond preferentially to faces: ‘the fusiform face area’ (‘FFA’) and the ‘occipital face area’ (‘OFA’). However, it is unclear whether these areas have an exclusive role in processing faces, or if sub-maximal responses in other visual areas such as the lateral occipital complex (LOC) are also involved. To clarify this issue, we tested a brain-damaged patient (PS) presenting a face-selective impairment with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The right hemisphere lesion of the prosoagnosic patient encompasses the ‘OFA’ but preserves the ‘FFA’ and LOC [14,16]. Using fMRI-adaptation, we found a larger response to different faces than repeated faces in the ventral part of the LOC both for normals and the patient, next to her right hemisphere lesion. This observation indicates that following prosopagnosia, areas that do not respond preferentially to faces such as the ventral part of the LOC (vLOC) may still be recruited to subtend residual perception of individual faces.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/561476
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laurence Dricot
Bettina Sorger
Christine Schiltz
Rainer Goebel
Bruno Rossion
spellingShingle Laurence Dricot
Bettina Sorger
Christine Schiltz
Rainer Goebel
Bruno Rossion
Evidence for Individual Face Discrimination in Non-Face Selective Areas of the Visual Cortex in Acquired Prosopagnosia
Behavioural Neurology
author_facet Laurence Dricot
Bettina Sorger
Christine Schiltz
Rainer Goebel
Bruno Rossion
author_sort Laurence Dricot
title Evidence for Individual Face Discrimination in Non-Face Selective Areas of the Visual Cortex in Acquired Prosopagnosia
title_short Evidence for Individual Face Discrimination in Non-Face Selective Areas of the Visual Cortex in Acquired Prosopagnosia
title_full Evidence for Individual Face Discrimination in Non-Face Selective Areas of the Visual Cortex in Acquired Prosopagnosia
title_fullStr Evidence for Individual Face Discrimination in Non-Face Selective Areas of the Visual Cortex in Acquired Prosopagnosia
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for Individual Face Discrimination in Non-Face Selective Areas of the Visual Cortex in Acquired Prosopagnosia
title_sort evidence for individual face discrimination in non-face selective areas of the visual cortex in acquired prosopagnosia
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Behavioural Neurology
issn 0953-4180
1875-8584
publishDate 2008-01-01
description Two areas in the human occipito-temporal cortex respond preferentially to faces: ‘the fusiform face area’ (‘FFA’) and the ‘occipital face area’ (‘OFA’). However, it is unclear whether these areas have an exclusive role in processing faces, or if sub-maximal responses in other visual areas such as the lateral occipital complex (LOC) are also involved. To clarify this issue, we tested a brain-damaged patient (PS) presenting a face-selective impairment with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The right hemisphere lesion of the prosoagnosic patient encompasses the ‘OFA’ but preserves the ‘FFA’ and LOC [14,16]. Using fMRI-adaptation, we found a larger response to different faces than repeated faces in the ventral part of the LOC both for normals and the patient, next to her right hemisphere lesion. This observation indicates that following prosopagnosia, areas that do not respond preferentially to faces such as the ventral part of the LOC (vLOC) may still be recruited to subtend residual perception of individual faces.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/561476
work_keys_str_mv AT laurencedricot evidenceforindividualfacediscriminationinnonfaceselectiveareasofthevisualcortexinacquiredprosopagnosia
AT bettinasorger evidenceforindividualfacediscriminationinnonfaceselectiveareasofthevisualcortexinacquiredprosopagnosia
AT christineschiltz evidenceforindividualfacediscriminationinnonfaceselectiveareasofthevisualcortexinacquiredprosopagnosia
AT rainergoebel evidenceforindividualfacediscriminationinnonfaceselectiveareasofthevisualcortexinacquiredprosopagnosia
AT brunorossion evidenceforindividualfacediscriminationinnonfaceselectiveareasofthevisualcortexinacquiredprosopagnosia
_version_ 1721337928561459200