Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial
Objective Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is a standard diagnostic modality for detecting prostate cancer (PCa). Pain during biopsy is the most important problem that still needs a solution. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 pain control techniques and to invest...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Galenos Yayinevi
2015-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Urological Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jurolsurgery.org/article_9061/Pain-Control-And-Its-Relationship-With-Histopathological-Outcome-In-Trus-guided-Prostate-Needle-Biopsy-A-Prospective-Non-randomized-Trial |
id |
doaj-64b6f92fcba247d9a733c79217fbdc50 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-64b6f92fcba247d9a733c79217fbdc502020-11-25T01:24:12ZengGalenos YayineviJournal of Urological Surgery2148-95802015-06-0122869010.4274/jus.2015.427Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized TrialAslan Demir0Kürşat Çeçen1Mert Ali Karadağ2Tufan Tarcan3Kafkas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Kars, TurkeyKafkas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Kars, TurkeyKafkas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Kars, TurkeyMarmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, İstanbul, TurkeyObjective Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is a standard diagnostic modality for detecting prostate cancer (PCa). Pain during biopsy is the most important problem that still needs a solution. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 pain control techniques and to investigate the relationship between the level of pain and histopathological findings. Materials and Methods 139 patients underwent prostate biopsy utilizing 3 analgesic techniques; 1- using lidocain gel (group 1), 2- pethidine+diazepam (group 2) and 3- periprostatic nerve block (group 3). Pain level, the tolerability and repetition of the procedure were questioned. The pathological findings were recorded. Results There was a statistically significant difference between group 1 and the others with regard to tolerability and repeating the procedure. The pain score during biopsy in group 1 was greater than in the other groups and those in group 2 was higher than in group 3. The mean pain score during probe insertion in group 2 was lower than in groups 1 and 3. The mean pain score taken during the biopsy was higher than that during probe insertion in group 2. However, the mean pain score during probeinsertion in group 3 was not different from that in group 1. There was no significant difference in pathological results between group 1 and groups 2 and 3. Pain scores in patients with chronic prostatitis were statistically higher than those in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and Pca in groups 2 and 3 (p<0.05). Conclusion Periprostatic nerve block is superior to the others. However, it is not better than pethidine plus diazepam during rectal probe insertion. In the presence of chronic prostatitis, pain scores can increase regardless of the pain control method.http://jurolsurgery.org/article_9061/Pain-Control-And-Its-Relationship-With-Histopathological-Outcome-In-Trus-guided-Prostate-Needle-Biopsy-A-Prospective-Non-randomized-TrialTRUSprostate biopsyhistopathologypain control |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aslan Demir Kürşat Çeçen Mert Ali Karadağ Tufan Tarcan |
spellingShingle |
Aslan Demir Kürşat Çeçen Mert Ali Karadağ Tufan Tarcan Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial Journal of Urological Surgery TRUS prostate biopsy histopathology pain control |
author_facet |
Aslan Demir Kürşat Çeçen Mert Ali Karadağ Tufan Tarcan |
author_sort |
Aslan Demir |
title |
Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial |
title_short |
Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial |
title_full |
Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial |
title_fullStr |
Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial |
title_sort |
pain control and its relationship with histopathological outcome in trus-guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective non-randomized trial |
publisher |
Galenos Yayinevi |
series |
Journal of Urological Surgery |
issn |
2148-9580 |
publishDate |
2015-06-01 |
description |
Objective
Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is a standard
diagnostic modality for detecting prostate cancer (PCa). Pain during
biopsy is the most important problem that still needs a solution. The
purpose of this study was to compare 3 pain control techniques and
to investigate the relationship between the level of pain and histopathological
findings.
Materials and Methods
139 patients underwent prostate biopsy utilizing 3 analgesic techniques;
1- using lidocain gel (group 1), 2- pethidine+diazepam (group 2) and
3- periprostatic nerve block (group 3). Pain level, the tolerability and
repetition of the procedure were questioned. The pathological findings
were recorded.
Results
There was a statistically significant difference between group 1 and the
others with regard to tolerability and repeating the procedure. The pain
score during biopsy in group 1 was greater than in the other groups
and those in group 2 was higher than in group 3. The mean pain score
during probe insertion in group 2 was lower than in groups 1 and 3. The
mean pain score taken during the biopsy was higher than that during
probe insertion in group 2. However, the mean pain score during probeinsertion in group 3 was not different from that in group 1. There was no
significant difference in pathological results between group 1 and groups
2 and 3. Pain scores in patients with chronic prostatitis were statistically
higher than those in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and
Pca in groups 2 and 3 (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Periprostatic nerve block is superior to the others. However, it is not
better than pethidine plus diazepam during rectal probe insertion. In the
presence of chronic prostatitis, pain scores can increase regardless of the
pain control method. |
topic |
TRUS prostate biopsy histopathology pain control |
url |
http://jurolsurgery.org/article_9061/Pain-Control-And-Its-Relationship-With-Histopathological-Outcome-In-Trus-guided-Prostate-Needle-Biopsy-A-Prospective-Non-randomized-Trial |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aslandemir paincontrolanditsrelationshipwithhistopathologicaloutcomeintrusguidedprostateneedlebiopsyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial AT kursatcecen paincontrolanditsrelationshipwithhistopathologicaloutcomeintrusguidedprostateneedlebiopsyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial AT mertalikaradag paincontrolanditsrelationshipwithhistopathologicaloutcomeintrusguidedprostateneedlebiopsyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial AT tufantarcan paincontrolanditsrelationshipwithhistopathologicaloutcomeintrusguidedprostateneedlebiopsyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial |
_version_ |
1725118279274463232 |