Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial

Objective Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is a standard diagnostic modality for detecting prostate cancer (PCa). Pain during biopsy is the most important problem that still needs a solution. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 pain control techniques and to invest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aslan Demir, Kürşat Çeçen, Mert Ali Karadağ, Tufan Tarcan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2015-06-01
Series:Journal of Urological Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jurolsurgery.org/article_9061/Pain-Control-And-Its-Relationship-With-Histopathological-Outcome-In-Trus-guided-Prostate-Needle-Biopsy-A-Prospective-Non-randomized-Trial
id doaj-64b6f92fcba247d9a733c79217fbdc50
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64b6f92fcba247d9a733c79217fbdc502020-11-25T01:24:12ZengGalenos YayineviJournal of Urological Surgery2148-95802015-06-0122869010.4274/jus.2015.427Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized TrialAslan Demir0Kürşat Çeçen1Mert Ali Karadağ2Tufan Tarcan3Kafkas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Kars, TurkeyKafkas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Kars, TurkeyKafkas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Kars, TurkeyMarmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, İstanbul, TurkeyObjective Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is a standard diagnostic modality for detecting prostate cancer (PCa). Pain during biopsy is the most important problem that still needs a solution. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 pain control techniques and to investigate the relationship between the level of pain and histopathological findings. Materials and Methods 139 patients underwent prostate biopsy utilizing 3 analgesic techniques; 1- using lidocain gel (group 1), 2- pethidine+diazepam (group 2) and 3- periprostatic nerve block (group 3). Pain level, the tolerability and repetition of the procedure were questioned. The pathological findings were recorded. Results There was a statistically significant difference between group 1 and the others with regard to tolerability and repeating the procedure. The pain score during biopsy in group 1 was greater than in the other groups and those in group 2 was higher than in group 3. The mean pain score during probe insertion in group 2 was lower than in groups 1 and 3. The mean pain score taken during the biopsy was higher than that during probe insertion in group 2. However, the mean pain score during probeinsertion in group 3 was not different from that in group 1. There was no significant difference in pathological results between group 1 and groups 2 and 3. Pain scores in patients with chronic prostatitis were statistically higher than those in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and Pca in groups 2 and 3 (p<0.05). Conclusion Periprostatic nerve block is superior to the others. However, it is not better than pethidine plus diazepam during rectal probe insertion. In the presence of chronic prostatitis, pain scores can increase regardless of the pain control method.http://jurolsurgery.org/article_9061/Pain-Control-And-Its-Relationship-With-Histopathological-Outcome-In-Trus-guided-Prostate-Needle-Biopsy-A-Prospective-Non-randomized-TrialTRUSprostate biopsyhistopathologypain control
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aslan Demir
Kürşat Çeçen
Mert Ali Karadağ
Tufan Tarcan
spellingShingle Aslan Demir
Kürşat Çeçen
Mert Ali Karadağ
Tufan Tarcan
Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial
Journal of Urological Surgery
TRUS
prostate biopsy
histopathology
pain control
author_facet Aslan Demir
Kürşat Çeçen
Mert Ali Karadağ
Tufan Tarcan
author_sort Aslan Demir
title Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial
title_short Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial
title_full Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Pain Control and Its Relationship with Histopathological Outcome in TRUS-Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial
title_sort pain control and its relationship with histopathological outcome in trus-guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective non-randomized trial
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
series Journal of Urological Surgery
issn 2148-9580
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Objective Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is a standard diagnostic modality for detecting prostate cancer (PCa). Pain during biopsy is the most important problem that still needs a solution. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 pain control techniques and to investigate the relationship between the level of pain and histopathological findings. Materials and Methods 139 patients underwent prostate biopsy utilizing 3 analgesic techniques; 1- using lidocain gel (group 1), 2- pethidine+diazepam (group 2) and 3- periprostatic nerve block (group 3). Pain level, the tolerability and repetition of the procedure were questioned. The pathological findings were recorded. Results There was a statistically significant difference between group 1 and the others with regard to tolerability and repeating the procedure. The pain score during biopsy in group 1 was greater than in the other groups and those in group 2 was higher than in group 3. The mean pain score during probe insertion in group 2 was lower than in groups 1 and 3. The mean pain score taken during the biopsy was higher than that during probe insertion in group 2. However, the mean pain score during probeinsertion in group 3 was not different from that in group 1. There was no significant difference in pathological results between group 1 and groups 2 and 3. Pain scores in patients with chronic prostatitis were statistically higher than those in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and Pca in groups 2 and 3 (p<0.05). Conclusion Periprostatic nerve block is superior to the others. However, it is not better than pethidine plus diazepam during rectal probe insertion. In the presence of chronic prostatitis, pain scores can increase regardless of the pain control method.
topic TRUS
prostate biopsy
histopathology
pain control
url http://jurolsurgery.org/article_9061/Pain-Control-And-Its-Relationship-With-Histopathological-Outcome-In-Trus-guided-Prostate-Needle-Biopsy-A-Prospective-Non-randomized-Trial
work_keys_str_mv AT aslandemir paincontrolanditsrelationshipwithhistopathologicaloutcomeintrusguidedprostateneedlebiopsyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial
AT kursatcecen paincontrolanditsrelationshipwithhistopathologicaloutcomeintrusguidedprostateneedlebiopsyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial
AT mertalikaradag paincontrolanditsrelationshipwithhistopathologicaloutcomeintrusguidedprostateneedlebiopsyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial
AT tufantarcan paincontrolanditsrelationshipwithhistopathologicaloutcomeintrusguidedprostateneedlebiopsyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial
_version_ 1725118279274463232