Effect of Single-Row and Double-Row Passive Vortex Generators on the Deep Dynamic Stall of a Wind Turbine Airfoil

<b> </b>Passive vortex generators (VGs) have been widely applied on wind turbines to boost the aerodynamic performance. Although VGs can delay the onset of static stall, the effect of VGs on dynamic stall is still incompletely understood. Therefore, this paper aims at investigating the d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chengyong Zhu, Tongguang Wang, Jie Chen, Wei Zhong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2535
id doaj-64fd7473fd064172b743ddeab9200cf9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64fd7473fd064172b743ddeab9200cf92020-11-25T03:23:39ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-05-01132535253510.3390/en13102535Effect of Single-Row and Double-Row Passive Vortex Generators on the Deep Dynamic Stall of a Wind Turbine AirfoilChengyong Zhu0Tongguang Wang1Jie Chen2Wei Zhong3Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Hi-Tech Research for Wind Turbine Design, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, ChinaJiangsu Key Laboratory of Hi-Tech Research for Wind Turbine Design, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, ChinaJiangsu Key Laboratory of Hi-Tech Research for Wind Turbine Design, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, ChinaJiangsu Key Laboratory of Hi-Tech Research for Wind Turbine Design, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China<b> </b>Passive vortex generators (VGs) have been widely applied on wind turbines to boost the aerodynamic performance. Although VGs can delay the onset of static stall, the effect of VGs on dynamic stall is still incompletely understood. Therefore, this paper aims at investigating the deep dynamic stall of NREL S809 airfoil controlled by single-row and double-row VGs. The URANS method with VGs fully resolved is used to simulate the unsteady airfoil flow. Firstly, both single-row and double-row VGs effectively suppress the flow separation and reduce the fluctuations in aerodynamic forces when the airfoil pitches up. The maximum lift coefficient is therefore increased beyond 40%, and the onset of deep dynamic stall is also delayed. This suggests that deep dynamic-stall behaviors can be properly controlled by VGs. Secondly, there is a great difference in aerodynamic performance between single-row and double-row VGs when the airfoil pitches down. Single-row VGs severely reduce the<i> </i>aerodynamic pitch damping by 64%, thereby undermining the torsional aeroelastic stability of airfoil. Double-row VGs quickly restore the decreased aerodynamic efficiency near the maximum angle of attack, and also significantly accelerate the flow reattachment. The second-row VGs can help the near-wall flow to withstand the adverse pressure gradient and then suppress the trailing-edge flow separation, particularly during the downstroke process. Generally, double-row VGs are better than single-row VGs concerning controlling deep dynamic stall. This work also gives a performance assessment of VGs in controlling the highly unsteady aerodynamic forces of a wind turbine airfoil.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2535deep dynamic stallpassive vortex generatorswind turbine airfoilURANS simulations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chengyong Zhu
Tongguang Wang
Jie Chen
Wei Zhong
spellingShingle Chengyong Zhu
Tongguang Wang
Jie Chen
Wei Zhong
Effect of Single-Row and Double-Row Passive Vortex Generators on the Deep Dynamic Stall of a Wind Turbine Airfoil
Energies
deep dynamic stall
passive vortex generators
wind turbine airfoil
URANS simulations
author_facet Chengyong Zhu
Tongguang Wang
Jie Chen
Wei Zhong
author_sort Chengyong Zhu
title Effect of Single-Row and Double-Row Passive Vortex Generators on the Deep Dynamic Stall of a Wind Turbine Airfoil
title_short Effect of Single-Row and Double-Row Passive Vortex Generators on the Deep Dynamic Stall of a Wind Turbine Airfoil
title_full Effect of Single-Row and Double-Row Passive Vortex Generators on the Deep Dynamic Stall of a Wind Turbine Airfoil
title_fullStr Effect of Single-Row and Double-Row Passive Vortex Generators on the Deep Dynamic Stall of a Wind Turbine Airfoil
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Single-Row and Double-Row Passive Vortex Generators on the Deep Dynamic Stall of a Wind Turbine Airfoil
title_sort effect of single-row and double-row passive vortex generators on the deep dynamic stall of a wind turbine airfoil
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-05-01
description <b> </b>Passive vortex generators (VGs) have been widely applied on wind turbines to boost the aerodynamic performance. Although VGs can delay the onset of static stall, the effect of VGs on dynamic stall is still incompletely understood. Therefore, this paper aims at investigating the deep dynamic stall of NREL S809 airfoil controlled by single-row and double-row VGs. The URANS method with VGs fully resolved is used to simulate the unsteady airfoil flow. Firstly, both single-row and double-row VGs effectively suppress the flow separation and reduce the fluctuations in aerodynamic forces when the airfoil pitches up. The maximum lift coefficient is therefore increased beyond 40%, and the onset of deep dynamic stall is also delayed. This suggests that deep dynamic-stall behaviors can be properly controlled by VGs. Secondly, there is a great difference in aerodynamic performance between single-row and double-row VGs when the airfoil pitches down. Single-row VGs severely reduce the<i> </i>aerodynamic pitch damping by 64%, thereby undermining the torsional aeroelastic stability of airfoil. Double-row VGs quickly restore the decreased aerodynamic efficiency near the maximum angle of attack, and also significantly accelerate the flow reattachment. The second-row VGs can help the near-wall flow to withstand the adverse pressure gradient and then suppress the trailing-edge flow separation, particularly during the downstroke process. Generally, double-row VGs are better than single-row VGs concerning controlling deep dynamic stall. This work also gives a performance assessment of VGs in controlling the highly unsteady aerodynamic forces of a wind turbine airfoil.
topic deep dynamic stall
passive vortex generators
wind turbine airfoil
URANS simulations
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2535
work_keys_str_mv AT chengyongzhu effectofsinglerowanddoublerowpassivevortexgeneratorsonthedeepdynamicstallofawindturbineairfoil
AT tongguangwang effectofsinglerowanddoublerowpassivevortexgeneratorsonthedeepdynamicstallofawindturbineairfoil
AT jiechen effectofsinglerowanddoublerowpassivevortexgeneratorsonthedeepdynamicstallofawindturbineairfoil
AT weizhong effectofsinglerowanddoublerowpassivevortexgeneratorsonthedeepdynamicstallofawindturbineairfoil
_version_ 1724605134380466176