NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma

Abstract Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumour. For patients with inoperable disease, few treatment options are available after first line chemotherapy. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has recently shown increased survival compared to standard ch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vilde Drageset Haakensen, Anna K. Nowak, Espen Basmo Ellingsen, Saima Jamil Farooqi, Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs, Henrik Horndalsveen, Tine Mcculloch, Oscar Grundberg, Susana M. Cedres, Åslaug Helland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:Journal of Translational Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02905-3
id doaj-64fe1d0ba38a4b3f9fc9f05cfd5c3739
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64fe1d0ba38a4b3f9fc9f05cfd5c37392021-06-06T11:12:35ZengBMCJournal of Translational Medicine1479-58762021-05-011911910.1186/s12967-021-02905-3NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesotheliomaVilde Drageset Haakensen0Anna K. Nowak1Espen Basmo Ellingsen2Saima Jamil Farooqi3Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs4Henrik Horndalsveen5Tine Mcculloch6Oscar Grundberg7Susana M. Cedres8Åslaug Helland9Department of Oncology, Oslo University HospitalNational Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, Institute for Respiratory Health, University of Western AustraliaDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Oncology and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University HospitalThoracic Oncology Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University HospitalOncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Vall d’Hebron Institute of OncologyDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University HospitalAbstract Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumour. For patients with inoperable disease, few treatment options are available after first line chemotherapy. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has recently shown increased survival compared to standard chemotherapy, but most patients do not respond and improvements are called for. Telomerase is expressed in mesothelioma cells, but only sparsely in normal tissues and is therefore an attractive target for therapeutic vaccination. Vaccination against telomerase is tolerable and has shown to induce immune responses associated with increased survival in other cancer types. There is a well-founded scientific rationale for the combination of a telomerase vaccine and checkpoint inhibition to improve treatment response in MPM patients. Methods NIPU is a randomized, multi-centre, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without telomerase vaccine in patients with inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants (n = 118) are randomized 1:1 into two treatment arms. All participants receive treatment with nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 2 years. Patients randomised to the experimental arm receive 8 intradermal injections of UV1 vaccine during the first three months of treatment. Tumour tissue, blood, urine, faeces and imaging will be collected for biomarker analyses and exploration of mechanisms for response and resistance to therapy. Discussion Checkpoint inhibition is used for treatment of mesothelioma, but many patients still do not respond. Increasing therapy response to immunotherapy is an important goal. Possible approaches include combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and other immunotherapeutic agents. Predictive biomarkers are necessary to ensure optimal treatment for each patient and to prevent unnecessary side effects. This trial seeks to improve treatment response by combining checkpoint inhibition with a telomerase vaccine and also to explore mechanisms for treatment response and resistance. Knowledge gained in the NIPU study may be transferred to the first line setting and to other cancers with limited benefit from immunotherapy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04300244, registered March 8th, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04300244?term=NIPU&draw=2&rank=1 .https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02905-3Malignant pleural mesotheliomaTelomerase vaccineImmunotherapyhTERTNivolumabIpilimumab
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vilde Drageset Haakensen
Anna K. Nowak
Espen Basmo Ellingsen
Saima Jamil Farooqi
Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs
Henrik Horndalsveen
Tine Mcculloch
Oscar Grundberg
Susana M. Cedres
Åslaug Helland
spellingShingle Vilde Drageset Haakensen
Anna K. Nowak
Espen Basmo Ellingsen
Saima Jamil Farooqi
Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs
Henrik Horndalsveen
Tine Mcculloch
Oscar Grundberg
Susana M. Cedres
Åslaug Helland
NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
Journal of Translational Medicine
Malignant pleural mesothelioma
Telomerase vaccine
Immunotherapy
hTERT
Nivolumab
Ipilimumab
author_facet Vilde Drageset Haakensen
Anna K. Nowak
Espen Basmo Ellingsen
Saima Jamil Farooqi
Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs
Henrik Horndalsveen
Tine Mcculloch
Oscar Grundberg
Susana M. Cedres
Åslaug Helland
author_sort Vilde Drageset Haakensen
title NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title_short NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title_full NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title_fullStr NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title_full_unstemmed NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title_sort nipu: a randomised, open-label, phase ii study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with uv1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
publisher BMC
series Journal of Translational Medicine
issn 1479-5876
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumour. For patients with inoperable disease, few treatment options are available after first line chemotherapy. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has recently shown increased survival compared to standard chemotherapy, but most patients do not respond and improvements are called for. Telomerase is expressed in mesothelioma cells, but only sparsely in normal tissues and is therefore an attractive target for therapeutic vaccination. Vaccination against telomerase is tolerable and has shown to induce immune responses associated with increased survival in other cancer types. There is a well-founded scientific rationale for the combination of a telomerase vaccine and checkpoint inhibition to improve treatment response in MPM patients. Methods NIPU is a randomized, multi-centre, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without telomerase vaccine in patients with inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants (n = 118) are randomized 1:1 into two treatment arms. All participants receive treatment with nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 2 years. Patients randomised to the experimental arm receive 8 intradermal injections of UV1 vaccine during the first three months of treatment. Tumour tissue, blood, urine, faeces and imaging will be collected for biomarker analyses and exploration of mechanisms for response and resistance to therapy. Discussion Checkpoint inhibition is used for treatment of mesothelioma, but many patients still do not respond. Increasing therapy response to immunotherapy is an important goal. Possible approaches include combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and other immunotherapeutic agents. Predictive biomarkers are necessary to ensure optimal treatment for each patient and to prevent unnecessary side effects. This trial seeks to improve treatment response by combining checkpoint inhibition with a telomerase vaccine and also to explore mechanisms for treatment response and resistance. Knowledge gained in the NIPU study may be transferred to the first line setting and to other cancers with limited benefit from immunotherapy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04300244, registered March 8th, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04300244?term=NIPU&draw=2&rank=1 .
topic Malignant pleural mesothelioma
Telomerase vaccine
Immunotherapy
hTERT
Nivolumab
Ipilimumab
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02905-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vildedragesethaakensen nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT annaknowak nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT espenbasmoellingsen nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT saimajamilfarooqi nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT mariamoksnesbjaanæs nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT henrikhorndalsveen nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT tinemcculloch nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT oscargrundberg nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT susanamcedres nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT aslaughelland nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
_version_ 1721394302198743040