Functional testing in animal models of spinal cord injury: not as straight forward as one would think

When exploring potential treatments for spinal cord injury (SCI), functional recovery is deemed the most relevant outcome measure when it comes to translational considerations. Yet, assessing such recovery and potential treatment effects is challenging and the pitfalls are frequently underestimated....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karim eFouad, Caitlin eHurd, David eMagnuson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnint.2013.00085/full
id doaj-652b81c70d324f82ae88419ad36c0828
record_format Article
spelling doaj-652b81c70d324f82ae88419ad36c08282020-11-25T01:05:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience1662-51452013-11-01710.3389/fnint.2013.0008571920Functional testing in animal models of spinal cord injury: not as straight forward as one would thinkKarim eFouad0Caitlin eHurd1David eMagnuson2University of AlbertaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of LouisvilleWhen exploring potential treatments for spinal cord injury (SCI), functional recovery is deemed the most relevant outcome measure when it comes to translational considerations. Yet, assessing such recovery and potential treatment effects is challenging and the pitfalls are frequently underestimated. The consequences are that in many cases positive results cannot be reliably replicated, and likely treatments that appear to lack effects have been dismissed prematurely. In this article we review the relationships between lesion location/severity and functional outcomes with specific consideration given to floor and ceiling effects. The roles of compensatory strategies, the challenges of distinguishing them from bona fide recovery, and of comparing function to pre-injury levels given the variability inherent in animal testing are discussed. Ultimately, we offer a series of considerations to enhance the power of functional analysis in animal models of SCI.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnint.2013.00085/fullLocomotionCompensationspinal cord injuryRecoverygrasping
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karim eFouad
Caitlin eHurd
David eMagnuson
spellingShingle Karim eFouad
Caitlin eHurd
David eMagnuson
Functional testing in animal models of spinal cord injury: not as straight forward as one would think
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Locomotion
Compensation
spinal cord injury
Recovery
grasping
author_facet Karim eFouad
Caitlin eHurd
David eMagnuson
author_sort Karim eFouad
title Functional testing in animal models of spinal cord injury: not as straight forward as one would think
title_short Functional testing in animal models of spinal cord injury: not as straight forward as one would think
title_full Functional testing in animal models of spinal cord injury: not as straight forward as one would think
title_fullStr Functional testing in animal models of spinal cord injury: not as straight forward as one would think
title_full_unstemmed Functional testing in animal models of spinal cord injury: not as straight forward as one would think
title_sort functional testing in animal models of spinal cord injury: not as straight forward as one would think
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
issn 1662-5145
publishDate 2013-11-01
description When exploring potential treatments for spinal cord injury (SCI), functional recovery is deemed the most relevant outcome measure when it comes to translational considerations. Yet, assessing such recovery and potential treatment effects is challenging and the pitfalls are frequently underestimated. The consequences are that in many cases positive results cannot be reliably replicated, and likely treatments that appear to lack effects have been dismissed prematurely. In this article we review the relationships between lesion location/severity and functional outcomes with specific consideration given to floor and ceiling effects. The roles of compensatory strategies, the challenges of distinguishing them from bona fide recovery, and of comparing function to pre-injury levels given the variability inherent in animal testing are discussed. Ultimately, we offer a series of considerations to enhance the power of functional analysis in animal models of SCI.
topic Locomotion
Compensation
spinal cord injury
Recovery
grasping
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnint.2013.00085/full
work_keys_str_mv AT karimefouad functionaltestinginanimalmodelsofspinalcordinjurynotasstraightforwardasonewouldthink
AT caitlinehurd functionaltestinginanimalmodelsofspinalcordinjurynotasstraightforwardasonewouldthink
AT davidemagnuson functionaltestinginanimalmodelsofspinalcordinjurynotasstraightforwardasonewouldthink
_version_ 1725192468208549888