A clinical and EEG scoring system that predicts early cortical response (N20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and outcome after cardiac arrest

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Anoxic coma following cardiac arrest is a common problem with ethical, social, and legal consequences. Except for unfavorable somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) results, predictors of unfavorable outcome with a 100% specificity a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bouchet Bruno, Ramakers Michel, du Cheyron Damien, Gaillard Cathy, Etard Olivier, Guillotin Damien, Daubin Cédric, Parienti Jean-Jacques, Charbonneau Pierre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-12-01
Series:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/8/35
id doaj-65612903131842bbb464905ca7fdb93a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65612903131842bbb464905ca7fdb93a2020-11-25T03:24:51ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612008-12-01813510.1186/1471-2261-8-35A clinical and EEG scoring system that predicts early cortical response (N20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and outcome after cardiac arrestBouchet BrunoRamakers Micheldu Cheyron DamienGaillard CathyEtard OlivierGuillotin DamienDaubin CédricParienti Jean-JacquesCharbonneau Pierre<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Anoxic coma following cardiac arrest is a common problem with ethical, social, and legal consequences. Except for unfavorable somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) results, predictors of unfavorable outcome with a 100% specificity and a high sensitivity are lacking. The aim of the current research was to construct a clinical and EEG scoring system that predicts early cortical response (N20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and 6-months outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We retrospectively reviewed the records of all consecutive patients who suffered cardiac arrest outside our hospital and were subsequently admitted to our facility from November 2002 to July 2006. We scored each case based on early clinical and EEG factors associated with unfavorable SSEPs, and we assessed the ability of this score to predict SSEP results and outcome.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Sixty-six patients qualified for inclusion in the cohort. Among them, 34 (52%) had unfavorable SSEP results. At day three, factors independently associated with unfavorable SSEPs were: absence of corneal (14 points) and pupillary (21 points) reflexes, myoclonus (25 points), extensor or absent motor response to painful stimulation (28 points), and malignant EEG (11 points). A score >40 points had a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 84%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85% to predict unfavorable SSEP results. A score >88 points had a PPV of 100%, but a sensitivity of 18%. Overall, this score had an area under ROC curves of 0.919. In addition, at day three, a score > 69 points had a PPV of 100% with a sensitivity of 32% to predict death or vegetative state.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A scoring system based on a combination of clinical and EEG findings can predict the absence of early cortical response to SSEPs. In settings without access to SSEPs, this score may help decision-making in a subset of comatose survivors after a cardiac arrest.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/8/35
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bouchet Bruno
Ramakers Michel
du Cheyron Damien
Gaillard Cathy
Etard Olivier
Guillotin Damien
Daubin Cédric
Parienti Jean-Jacques
Charbonneau Pierre
spellingShingle Bouchet Bruno
Ramakers Michel
du Cheyron Damien
Gaillard Cathy
Etard Olivier
Guillotin Damien
Daubin Cédric
Parienti Jean-Jacques
Charbonneau Pierre
A clinical and EEG scoring system that predicts early cortical response (N20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and outcome after cardiac arrest
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
author_facet Bouchet Bruno
Ramakers Michel
du Cheyron Damien
Gaillard Cathy
Etard Olivier
Guillotin Damien
Daubin Cédric
Parienti Jean-Jacques
Charbonneau Pierre
author_sort Bouchet Bruno
title A clinical and EEG scoring system that predicts early cortical response (N20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and outcome after cardiac arrest
title_short A clinical and EEG scoring system that predicts early cortical response (N20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and outcome after cardiac arrest
title_full A clinical and EEG scoring system that predicts early cortical response (N20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and outcome after cardiac arrest
title_fullStr A clinical and EEG scoring system that predicts early cortical response (N20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and outcome after cardiac arrest
title_full_unstemmed A clinical and EEG scoring system that predicts early cortical response (N20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and outcome after cardiac arrest
title_sort clinical and eeg scoring system that predicts early cortical response (n20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and outcome after cardiac arrest
publisher BMC
series BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
issn 1471-2261
publishDate 2008-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Anoxic coma following cardiac arrest is a common problem with ethical, social, and legal consequences. Except for unfavorable somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) results, predictors of unfavorable outcome with a 100% specificity and a high sensitivity are lacking. The aim of the current research was to construct a clinical and EEG scoring system that predicts early cortical response (N20) to somatosensory evoked potentials and 6-months outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We retrospectively reviewed the records of all consecutive patients who suffered cardiac arrest outside our hospital and were subsequently admitted to our facility from November 2002 to July 2006. We scored each case based on early clinical and EEG factors associated with unfavorable SSEPs, and we assessed the ability of this score to predict SSEP results and outcome.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Sixty-six patients qualified for inclusion in the cohort. Among them, 34 (52%) had unfavorable SSEP results. At day three, factors independently associated with unfavorable SSEPs were: absence of corneal (14 points) and pupillary (21 points) reflexes, myoclonus (25 points), extensor or absent motor response to painful stimulation (28 points), and malignant EEG (11 points). A score >40 points had a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 84%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85% to predict unfavorable SSEP results. A score >88 points had a PPV of 100%, but a sensitivity of 18%. Overall, this score had an area under ROC curves of 0.919. In addition, at day three, a score > 69 points had a PPV of 100% with a sensitivity of 32% to predict death or vegetative state.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A scoring system based on a combination of clinical and EEG findings can predict the absence of early cortical response to SSEPs. In settings without access to SSEPs, this score may help decision-making in a subset of comatose survivors after a cardiac arrest.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/8/35
work_keys_str_mv AT bouchetbruno aclinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT ramakersmichel aclinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT ducheyrondamien aclinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT gaillardcathy aclinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT etardolivier aclinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT guillotindamien aclinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT daubincedric aclinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT parientijeanjacques aclinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT charbonneaupierre aclinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT bouchetbruno clinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT ramakersmichel clinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT ducheyrondamien clinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT gaillardcathy clinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT etardolivier clinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT guillotindamien clinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT daubincedric clinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT parientijeanjacques clinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
AT charbonneaupierre clinicalandeegscoringsystemthatpredictsearlycorticalresponsen20tosomatosensoryevokedpotentialsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest
_version_ 1724599427794993152