Volume Introduction: Gilbert Ryle on Propositions, Propositional Attitudes, and Theoretical Knowledge

In the introduction to the special volume, Gilbert Ryle: Intelligence, Practice and Skill, Julia Tanney introduces the contributions of Michael Kremer, Stina Bäckström and Martin Gustafsson, and Will Small, each of which indicates concern about the appropriation of Ryle’s distinction between knowing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Julia Tanney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MULPress 2017-05-01
Series:Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
Online Access:https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/3203
id doaj-656b3fa111a94d96bbd63b1a61950225
record_format Article
spelling doaj-656b3fa111a94d96bbd63b1a619502252020-11-25T04:10:32ZengMULPressJournal for the History of Analytical Philosophy2159-03032017-05-015510.15173/jhap.v5i5.3203Volume Introduction: Gilbert Ryle on Propositions, Propositional Attitudes, and Theoretical KnowledgeJulia TanneyIn the introduction to the special volume, Gilbert Ryle: Intelligence, Practice and Skill, Julia Tanney introduces the contributions of Michael Kremer, Stina Bäckström and Martin Gustafsson, and Will Small, each of which indicates concern about the appropriation of Ryle’s distinction between knowing-how and knowing-that in seminal work in contemporary epistemology. Expressing agreement with the authors that something has gone awry in these borrowings from Ryle, Tanney takes this criticism to a deeper level. She argues that the very notion of content-bearing, causally-efficacious mental states, let alone representational states of knowledge-that or knowledge-how, embodies the very presuppositions that Ryle calls into question in his rejection of classical theories of meaning and his related warning of the type-errors involved in conflating rational and mechanistic explanation. That these mental posits are presupposed, unchallenged, in today’s debates make his arguments against intellectualism particularly difficult to discern.https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/3203
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julia Tanney
spellingShingle Julia Tanney
Volume Introduction: Gilbert Ryle on Propositions, Propositional Attitudes, and Theoretical Knowledge
Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
author_facet Julia Tanney
author_sort Julia Tanney
title Volume Introduction: Gilbert Ryle on Propositions, Propositional Attitudes, and Theoretical Knowledge
title_short Volume Introduction: Gilbert Ryle on Propositions, Propositional Attitudes, and Theoretical Knowledge
title_full Volume Introduction: Gilbert Ryle on Propositions, Propositional Attitudes, and Theoretical Knowledge
title_fullStr Volume Introduction: Gilbert Ryle on Propositions, Propositional Attitudes, and Theoretical Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Volume Introduction: Gilbert Ryle on Propositions, Propositional Attitudes, and Theoretical Knowledge
title_sort volume introduction: gilbert ryle on propositions, propositional attitudes, and theoretical knowledge
publisher MULPress
series Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
issn 2159-0303
publishDate 2017-05-01
description In the introduction to the special volume, Gilbert Ryle: Intelligence, Practice and Skill, Julia Tanney introduces the contributions of Michael Kremer, Stina Bäckström and Martin Gustafsson, and Will Small, each of which indicates concern about the appropriation of Ryle’s distinction between knowing-how and knowing-that in seminal work in contemporary epistemology. Expressing agreement with the authors that something has gone awry in these borrowings from Ryle, Tanney takes this criticism to a deeper level. She argues that the very notion of content-bearing, causally-efficacious mental states, let alone representational states of knowledge-that or knowledge-how, embodies the very presuppositions that Ryle calls into question in his rejection of classical theories of meaning and his related warning of the type-errors involved in conflating rational and mechanistic explanation. That these mental posits are presupposed, unchallenged, in today’s debates make his arguments against intellectualism particularly difficult to discern.
url https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/3203
work_keys_str_mv AT juliatanney volumeintroductiongilbertryleonpropositionspropositionalattitudesandtheoreticalknowledge
_version_ 1724420281360973824