The evolution of cranial form in mid-Pleistocene Homo

Interactions of the brain and cranium in archaic populations remain poorly understood. Hominin fossils from Middle Pleistocene localities in Africa and Europe have been allocated to one or more species distinct from Homo erectus, the Neanderthals and modern humans, based on the assumption that char...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: G. Rightmire
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academy of Science of South Africa 2012-03-01
Series:South African Journal of Science
Online Access:https://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/9692
id doaj-658de02c01624ec4abb710dfb89956c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-658de02c01624ec4abb710dfb89956c52021-02-20T06:03:55ZengAcademy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science1996-74892012-03-011083/4The evolution of cranial form in mid-Pleistocene HomoG. Rightmire0Harvard University Interactions of the brain and cranium in archaic populations remain poorly understood. Hominin fossils from Middle Pleistocene localities in Africa and Europe have been allocated to one or more species distinct from Homo erectus, the Neanderthals and modern humans, based on the assumption that characters of the vault and face are developmentally independent. However, it is possible that increased frontal width, parietal lengthening, midvault expansion and occipital rounding all reflect encephalisation occurring within the H. erectus lineage. If specimens from Broken Hill and Elandsfontein (in southern Africa) and Sima de los Huesos and Petralona (in Europe) differ from H. erectus only in brain volume, then it will be difficult to distinguish and diagnose Homo rhodesiensis or Homo heidelbergensis adequately. In this study, correlation analysis showed that the brain fails to influence vault breadth within either H. erectus or the mid-Pleistocene sample. Instead, the (large) cranial base has a major effect on width. Variation in brain volume is not associated with frontal flattening. In H. erectus and in individuals such as Bodo and Petralona, the massive face seems to override the brain as a determinant of frontal curvature. Small H. erectus crania have rounded occipitals, whilst larger individuals show greater flexion. Later hominins do not follow this trend, and encephalisation cannot explain the occipital rounding that is present. Few of the vault characters considered diagnostic for the mid-Pleistocene fossils can be attributed to increasing brain volume. The situation is complex, as of course the brain must influence some traits indirectly. The cranial base is also an instrument of change. Discriminant analysis identified basicranial breadth as critical to distinguishing individuals such as Broken Hill, Sima de los Huesos and Petralona from H. erectus. https://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/9692
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. Rightmire
spellingShingle G. Rightmire
The evolution of cranial form in mid-Pleistocene Homo
South African Journal of Science
author_facet G. Rightmire
author_sort G. Rightmire
title The evolution of cranial form in mid-Pleistocene Homo
title_short The evolution of cranial form in mid-Pleistocene Homo
title_full The evolution of cranial form in mid-Pleistocene Homo
title_fullStr The evolution of cranial form in mid-Pleistocene Homo
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of cranial form in mid-Pleistocene Homo
title_sort evolution of cranial form in mid-pleistocene homo
publisher Academy of Science of South Africa
series South African Journal of Science
issn 1996-7489
publishDate 2012-03-01
description Interactions of the brain and cranium in archaic populations remain poorly understood. Hominin fossils from Middle Pleistocene localities in Africa and Europe have been allocated to one or more species distinct from Homo erectus, the Neanderthals and modern humans, based on the assumption that characters of the vault and face are developmentally independent. However, it is possible that increased frontal width, parietal lengthening, midvault expansion and occipital rounding all reflect encephalisation occurring within the H. erectus lineage. If specimens from Broken Hill and Elandsfontein (in southern Africa) and Sima de los Huesos and Petralona (in Europe) differ from H. erectus only in brain volume, then it will be difficult to distinguish and diagnose Homo rhodesiensis or Homo heidelbergensis adequately. In this study, correlation analysis showed that the brain fails to influence vault breadth within either H. erectus or the mid-Pleistocene sample. Instead, the (large) cranial base has a major effect on width. Variation in brain volume is not associated with frontal flattening. In H. erectus and in individuals such as Bodo and Petralona, the massive face seems to override the brain as a determinant of frontal curvature. Small H. erectus crania have rounded occipitals, whilst larger individuals show greater flexion. Later hominins do not follow this trend, and encephalisation cannot explain the occipital rounding that is present. Few of the vault characters considered diagnostic for the mid-Pleistocene fossils can be attributed to increasing brain volume. The situation is complex, as of course the brain must influence some traits indirectly. The cranial base is also an instrument of change. Discriminant analysis identified basicranial breadth as critical to distinguishing individuals such as Broken Hill, Sima de los Huesos and Petralona from H. erectus.
url https://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/9692
work_keys_str_mv AT grightmire theevolutionofcranialforminmidpleistocenehomo
AT grightmire evolutionofcranialforminmidpleistocenehomo
_version_ 1724259979460870144