The efficacy and safety of selective H1-antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.

Both selective H1-antihistamine (SAH) and leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) have been shown to be effective in treating patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), but it is still uncertain which treatment option is optimal. This meta-analysis was aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Xu, Jixiang Zhang, Jun Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4226613?pdf=render
id doaj-65a26c2955cd4b888bbc3bc6a48eff56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65a26c2955cd4b888bbc3bc6a48eff562020-11-24T21:38:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01911e11281510.1371/journal.pone.0112815The efficacy and safety of selective H1-antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.Yu XuJixiang ZhangJun WangBoth selective H1-antihistamine (SAH) and leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) have been shown to be effective in treating patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), but it is still uncertain which treatment option is optimal. This meta-analysis was aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SAH and LTRA for SAR.PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for all eligible studies that compared the efficacy and safety of SAH and LTRA for SAR up to September 7, 2014. The pooled mean difference (MD), odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model.Nine studies with 5781 SAR patients were included. The results showed that SAH is superior to LTRA in terms of the daytime eye symptoms score (DESS) and composite symptoms score (CSS) for SAR (MD = 0.06, 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.10, P = 0.000, I2 = 99%; MD = 0.03, 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.05, P = 0.010, I2 = 98%), whereas LTRA overmatched SAH with respect to the night-time symptoms score (NSS) (MD = -0.04, 95% CI, -0.05 to -0.02, P = 0.000, I2 = 97%). Additionally, the results of subgroup analysis indicated that the dose, duration and gender of the patients might impact the comparisons of the effects of SAH and LTRA on their efficacy for SAR.This meta-analysis suggested that SAH and LTRA have similar effects and safety for SAR, but SAH is more appropriate for daytime nasal symptoms (congestion, rhinorrhea, pruritus and sneezing), while LTRA is better suited for nighttime symptoms (difficulty going to sleep, nighttime awakenings, and nasal congestion on awakening), respectively. Meanwhile, the dose, duration and gender of patients may influence the anti-SAR effects of SAH and LTRA.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4226613?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yu Xu
Jixiang Zhang
Jun Wang
spellingShingle Yu Xu
Jixiang Zhang
Jun Wang
The efficacy and safety of selective H1-antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yu Xu
Jixiang Zhang
Jun Wang
author_sort Yu Xu
title The efficacy and safety of selective H1-antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.
title_short The efficacy and safety of selective H1-antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.
title_full The efficacy and safety of selective H1-antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of selective H1-antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of selective H1-antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.
title_sort efficacy and safety of selective h1-antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Both selective H1-antihistamine (SAH) and leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) have been shown to be effective in treating patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), but it is still uncertain which treatment option is optimal. This meta-analysis was aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SAH and LTRA for SAR.PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for all eligible studies that compared the efficacy and safety of SAH and LTRA for SAR up to September 7, 2014. The pooled mean difference (MD), odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model.Nine studies with 5781 SAR patients were included. The results showed that SAH is superior to LTRA in terms of the daytime eye symptoms score (DESS) and composite symptoms score (CSS) for SAR (MD = 0.06, 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.10, P = 0.000, I2 = 99%; MD = 0.03, 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.05, P = 0.010, I2 = 98%), whereas LTRA overmatched SAH with respect to the night-time symptoms score (NSS) (MD = -0.04, 95% CI, -0.05 to -0.02, P = 0.000, I2 = 97%). Additionally, the results of subgroup analysis indicated that the dose, duration and gender of the patients might impact the comparisons of the effects of SAH and LTRA on their efficacy for SAR.This meta-analysis suggested that SAH and LTRA have similar effects and safety for SAR, but SAH is more appropriate for daytime nasal symptoms (congestion, rhinorrhea, pruritus and sneezing), while LTRA is better suited for nighttime symptoms (difficulty going to sleep, nighttime awakenings, and nasal congestion on awakening), respectively. Meanwhile, the dose, duration and gender of patients may influence the anti-SAR effects of SAH and LTRA.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4226613?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxu theefficacyandsafetyofselectiveh1antihistamineversusleukotrienereceptorantagonistforseasonalallergicrhinitisametaanalysis
AT jixiangzhang theefficacyandsafetyofselectiveh1antihistamineversusleukotrienereceptorantagonistforseasonalallergicrhinitisametaanalysis
AT junwang theefficacyandsafetyofselectiveh1antihistamineversusleukotrienereceptorantagonistforseasonalallergicrhinitisametaanalysis
AT yuxu efficacyandsafetyofselectiveh1antihistamineversusleukotrienereceptorantagonistforseasonalallergicrhinitisametaanalysis
AT jixiangzhang efficacyandsafetyofselectiveh1antihistamineversusleukotrienereceptorantagonistforseasonalallergicrhinitisametaanalysis
AT junwang efficacyandsafetyofselectiveh1antihistamineversusleukotrienereceptorantagonistforseasonalallergicrhinitisametaanalysis
_version_ 1725933515060543488