Not as Bad as It Seems? A Literature Review on the Case of Microplastic Uptake in Fish

Within the past decade, microplastic (MP) particles (<5 mm in size) became the focus of both scientific and public attention, on one hand due to their cumulative industrial application and global presence, on the other hand due to their size range allowing the interaction with organisms at th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carolin Müller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.672768/full
id doaj-65d86c439d6844cc82a440d169472e81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65d86c439d6844cc82a440d169472e812021-04-21T04:52:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452021-04-01810.3389/fmars.2021.672768672768Not as Bad as It Seems? A Literature Review on the Case of Microplastic Uptake in FishCarolin Müller0Carolin Müller1Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, GermanyUniversity of Bremen, Faculty Biology/Chemistry (FB02), Bremen, GermanyWithin the past decade, microplastic (MP) particles (<5 mm in size) became the focus of both scientific and public attention, on one hand due to their cumulative industrial application and global presence, on the other hand due to their size range allowing the interaction with organisms at the base of the marine food web. Along with the growing evidence of their ubiquitous distribution, the ingestion of MP fibers and fragments has been verified for a variety of marine biota, with fish species being among the group of organisms most intensively studied both in the laboratory and in the field. While the gross of scientific literature focuses on the quantification and chemical characterization of MP in the gastrointestinal tract of fish, in-depth investigations on the impacts or a contextualization of ingestion are rarely accomplished. Yet, the constant media-coverage and omnipresence of the topic present a (threat) scenario among civil society which might lack a solid scientific foundation. This review, therefore, analyses the scientific output of 90 field studies covering 487 different fish taxa with due regard to explanatory variables for MP ingestion. Additionally, it highlights persistent knowledge gaps in relation to the examination of in-situ ingestion effects and proposes measures how to approach them in future research initiatives. Moreover, the potential existence of a publication bias and a consequent distortion of the perception of the topic is evaluated.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.672768/fullmarine litteranthropogenic particlesingestionmarine fishpublication bias
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carolin Müller
Carolin Müller
spellingShingle Carolin Müller
Carolin Müller
Not as Bad as It Seems? A Literature Review on the Case of Microplastic Uptake in Fish
Frontiers in Marine Science
marine litter
anthropogenic particles
ingestion
marine fish
publication bias
author_facet Carolin Müller
Carolin Müller
author_sort Carolin Müller
title Not as Bad as It Seems? A Literature Review on the Case of Microplastic Uptake in Fish
title_short Not as Bad as It Seems? A Literature Review on the Case of Microplastic Uptake in Fish
title_full Not as Bad as It Seems? A Literature Review on the Case of Microplastic Uptake in Fish
title_fullStr Not as Bad as It Seems? A Literature Review on the Case of Microplastic Uptake in Fish
title_full_unstemmed Not as Bad as It Seems? A Literature Review on the Case of Microplastic Uptake in Fish
title_sort not as bad as it seems? a literature review on the case of microplastic uptake in fish
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Marine Science
issn 2296-7745
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Within the past decade, microplastic (MP) particles (<5 mm in size) became the focus of both scientific and public attention, on one hand due to their cumulative industrial application and global presence, on the other hand due to their size range allowing the interaction with organisms at the base of the marine food web. Along with the growing evidence of their ubiquitous distribution, the ingestion of MP fibers and fragments has been verified for a variety of marine biota, with fish species being among the group of organisms most intensively studied both in the laboratory and in the field. While the gross of scientific literature focuses on the quantification and chemical characterization of MP in the gastrointestinal tract of fish, in-depth investigations on the impacts or a contextualization of ingestion are rarely accomplished. Yet, the constant media-coverage and omnipresence of the topic present a (threat) scenario among civil society which might lack a solid scientific foundation. This review, therefore, analyses the scientific output of 90 field studies covering 487 different fish taxa with due regard to explanatory variables for MP ingestion. Additionally, it highlights persistent knowledge gaps in relation to the examination of in-situ ingestion effects and proposes measures how to approach them in future research initiatives. Moreover, the potential existence of a publication bias and a consequent distortion of the perception of the topic is evaluated.
topic marine litter
anthropogenic particles
ingestion
marine fish
publication bias
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.672768/full
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinmuller notasbadasitseemsaliteraturereviewonthecaseofmicroplasticuptakeinfish
AT carolinmuller notasbadasitseemsaliteraturereviewonthecaseofmicroplasticuptakeinfish
_version_ 1721516909598343168