Multiscale Characterizations of Surface Anisotropies

Anisotropy can influence surface function and can be an indication of processing. These influences and indications include friction, wetting, and microwear. This article studies two methods for multiscale quantification and visualization of anisotropy. One uses multiscale curvature tensor analysis a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomasz Bartkowiak, Johan Berglund, Christopher A. Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/13/3028
id doaj-65e65c3f58cf48e693450dc01baa60a7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65e65c3f58cf48e693450dc01baa60a72020-11-25T03:07:14ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442020-07-01133028302810.3390/ma13133028Multiscale Characterizations of Surface AnisotropiesTomasz Bartkowiak0Johan Berglund1Christopher A. Brown2Institute of Mechanical Technology, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Manufacturing, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, SE-43153 Mölndal, SwedenSurface Metrology Lab, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USAAnisotropy can influence surface function and can be an indication of processing. These influences and indications include friction, wetting, and microwear. This article studies two methods for multiscale quantification and visualization of anisotropy. One uses multiscale curvature tensor analysis and shows anisotropy in horizontal coordinates i.e., topocentric. The other uses multiple bandpass filters (also known as sliding bandpass filters) applied prior to calculating anisotropy parameters, texture aspect ratios (Str) and texture directions (Std), showing anisotropy in horizontal directions only. Topographies were studied on two milled steel surfaces, one convex with an evident large scale, cylindrical form anisotropy, the other nominally flat with smaller scale anisotropies; a µEDMed surface, an example of an isotropic surface; and an additively manufactured surface with pillar-like features. Curvature tensors contain the two principal curvatures, i.e., maximum and minimum curvatures, which are orthogonal, and their directions, at each location. Principal directions are plotted for each calculated location on each surface, at each scale considered. Histograms in horizontal coordinates show altitude and azimuth angles of principal curvatures, elucidating dominant texture directions at each scale. Str and Std do not show vertical components, i.e., altitudes, of anisotropy. Changes of anisotropy with scale categorically failed to be detected by traditional characterization methods used conventionally. These multiscale methods show clearly in several representations that anisotropy changes with scale on actual surface measurements with markedly different anisotropies.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/13/3028surface textureanisotropymultiscale
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tomasz Bartkowiak
Johan Berglund
Christopher A. Brown
spellingShingle Tomasz Bartkowiak
Johan Berglund
Christopher A. Brown
Multiscale Characterizations of Surface Anisotropies
Materials
surface texture
anisotropy
multiscale
author_facet Tomasz Bartkowiak
Johan Berglund
Christopher A. Brown
author_sort Tomasz Bartkowiak
title Multiscale Characterizations of Surface Anisotropies
title_short Multiscale Characterizations of Surface Anisotropies
title_full Multiscale Characterizations of Surface Anisotropies
title_fullStr Multiscale Characterizations of Surface Anisotropies
title_full_unstemmed Multiscale Characterizations of Surface Anisotropies
title_sort multiscale characterizations of surface anisotropies
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Anisotropy can influence surface function and can be an indication of processing. These influences and indications include friction, wetting, and microwear. This article studies two methods for multiscale quantification and visualization of anisotropy. One uses multiscale curvature tensor analysis and shows anisotropy in horizontal coordinates i.e., topocentric. The other uses multiple bandpass filters (also known as sliding bandpass filters) applied prior to calculating anisotropy parameters, texture aspect ratios (Str) and texture directions (Std), showing anisotropy in horizontal directions only. Topographies were studied on two milled steel surfaces, one convex with an evident large scale, cylindrical form anisotropy, the other nominally flat with smaller scale anisotropies; a µEDMed surface, an example of an isotropic surface; and an additively manufactured surface with pillar-like features. Curvature tensors contain the two principal curvatures, i.e., maximum and minimum curvatures, which are orthogonal, and their directions, at each location. Principal directions are plotted for each calculated location on each surface, at each scale considered. Histograms in horizontal coordinates show altitude and azimuth angles of principal curvatures, elucidating dominant texture directions at each scale. Str and Std do not show vertical components, i.e., altitudes, of anisotropy. Changes of anisotropy with scale categorically failed to be detected by traditional characterization methods used conventionally. These multiscale methods show clearly in several representations that anisotropy changes with scale on actual surface measurements with markedly different anisotropies.
topic surface texture
anisotropy
multiscale
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/13/3028
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaszbartkowiak multiscalecharacterizationsofsurfaceanisotropies
AT johanberglund multiscalecharacterizationsofsurfaceanisotropies
AT christopherabrown multiscalecharacterizationsofsurfaceanisotropies
_version_ 1724671694448099328