The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Personal invitations for fecal occult blood tests (nowadays mostly fecal immunochemical tests) are increasingly used to raise their usage for colorectal cancer screening. However, there is a large heterogeneity in applied invitation schemes. We aimed to review evidence for the effectiveness of vario...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura F. Gruner, Efrat L. Amitay, Thomas Heisser, Feng Guo, Tobias Niedermaier, Anton Gies, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/7/1520
id doaj-664462f8c42948d4ab92367161f5fa83
record_format Article
spelling doaj-664462f8c42948d4ab92367161f5fa832021-03-26T00:07:25ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942021-03-01131520152010.3390/cancers13071520The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled TrialsLaura F. Gruner0Efrat L. Amitay1Thomas Heisser2Feng Guo3Tobias Niedermaier4Anton Gies5Michael Hoffmeister6Hermann Brenner7German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyDivision of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyPersonal invitations for fecal occult blood tests (nowadays mostly fecal immunochemical tests) are increasingly used to raise their usage for colorectal cancer screening. However, there is a large heterogeneity in applied invitation schemes. We aimed to review evidence for the effectiveness of various invitation schemes. The main outcome was the fecal occult blood test usage rate. A systematic search was performed in Medline and Web of Science (up to July 9, 2020). Randomized controlled trials or cluster-randomized controlled trials were eligible, which reported on general invitations for fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening sent to the general population at average colorectal cancer risk. (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020169409). Overall, 34 studies were included. Invitations with an attached, i.e., mailed fecal occult blood test consistently increased test usage by 4–19.7% points, compared to other methods of test provision. Likewise, the introduction of advance notification consistently led to a higher usage rate, with an increase of 3.3–10.8% points. Reminders showed positive but varying effects by method. With an increase of 8.5–15.8% points, letter or email reminders were more effective than reminders by phone call or text message (0.6–6.5% points). Inconsistent results were found for financial incentives ((−8.4)–20% points) and for added or changed invitation material ((−3.5)–11.8% points). With 3.5–24.7% points, the strongest increases in use were achieved by multifaceted invitation, implementing multiple components. Any invitation scheme was superior over no invitation. Advance notification, mailing of fecal occult blood test, and reminders were consistently shown to have major, complementary potential to increase participation in fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening settings.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/7/1520colorectal cancerearly detectionscreeningfecal occult blood testsinvitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura F. Gruner
Efrat L. Amitay
Thomas Heisser
Feng Guo
Tobias Niedermaier
Anton Gies
Michael Hoffmeister
Hermann Brenner
spellingShingle Laura F. Gruner
Efrat L. Amitay
Thomas Heisser
Feng Guo
Tobias Niedermaier
Anton Gies
Michael Hoffmeister
Hermann Brenner
The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Cancers
colorectal cancer
early detection
screening
fecal occult blood tests
invitation
author_facet Laura F. Gruner
Efrat L. Amitay
Thomas Heisser
Feng Guo
Tobias Niedermaier
Anton Gies
Michael Hoffmeister
Hermann Brenner
author_sort Laura F. Gruner
title The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort effects of different invitation schemes on the use of fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening: systematic review of randomized controlled trials
publisher MDPI AG
series Cancers
issn 2072-6694
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Personal invitations for fecal occult blood tests (nowadays mostly fecal immunochemical tests) are increasingly used to raise their usage for colorectal cancer screening. However, there is a large heterogeneity in applied invitation schemes. We aimed to review evidence for the effectiveness of various invitation schemes. The main outcome was the fecal occult blood test usage rate. A systematic search was performed in Medline and Web of Science (up to July 9, 2020). Randomized controlled trials or cluster-randomized controlled trials were eligible, which reported on general invitations for fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening sent to the general population at average colorectal cancer risk. (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020169409). Overall, 34 studies were included. Invitations with an attached, i.e., mailed fecal occult blood test consistently increased test usage by 4–19.7% points, compared to other methods of test provision. Likewise, the introduction of advance notification consistently led to a higher usage rate, with an increase of 3.3–10.8% points. Reminders showed positive but varying effects by method. With an increase of 8.5–15.8% points, letter or email reminders were more effective than reminders by phone call or text message (0.6–6.5% points). Inconsistent results were found for financial incentives ((−8.4)–20% points) and for added or changed invitation material ((−3.5)–11.8% points). With 3.5–24.7% points, the strongest increases in use were achieved by multifaceted invitation, implementing multiple components. Any invitation scheme was superior over no invitation. Advance notification, mailing of fecal occult blood test, and reminders were consistently shown to have major, complementary potential to increase participation in fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening settings.
topic colorectal cancer
early detection
screening
fecal occult blood tests
invitation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/7/1520
work_keys_str_mv AT laurafgruner theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT efratlamitay theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT thomasheisser theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fengguo theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tobiasniedermaier theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT antongies theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT michaelhoffmeister theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hermannbrenner theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT laurafgruner effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT efratlamitay effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT thomasheisser effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fengguo effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tobiasniedermaier effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT antongies effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT michaelhoffmeister effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hermannbrenner effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1724203098868547584