Comparison of frictional resistance between various bracket types and archwire materials ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligatures

Background: Friction plays a very crucial role in our daily life and orthodontics is no exception. Various materials possess friction of varying intensity, which ultimately affects tooth movement. Aim: The aim was to compare the frictional resistance (FR) between various bracket types and archwire...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vasu Murthy Sesham, Anupriya Jaitly, Lalitha Chigurupati, Praveen Kumar Neela, Pavan Kumar Mamillapalli, Revathi Peddu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jdrntruhs.org/article.asp?issn=2277-8632;year=2015;volume=4;issue=4;spage=246;epage=252;aulast=Sesham
id doaj-6667d7278b09436cb8734210bec5c385
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6667d7278b09436cb8734210bec5c3852020-11-24T21:41:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences2277-86322015-01-014424625210.4103/2277-8632.171741Comparison of frictional resistance between various bracket types and archwire materials ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligaturesVasu Murthy SeshamAnupriya JaitlyLalitha ChigurupatiPraveen Kumar NeelaPavan Kumar MamillapalliRevathi PedduBackground: Friction plays a very crucial role in our daily life and orthodontics is no exception. Various materials possess friction of varying intensity, which ultimately affects tooth movement. Aim: The aim was to compare the frictional resistance (FR) between various bracket types and archwire materials when ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligatures so as to obtain best bracket-archwire combination possessing least FR for clinicians in achieving optimal mechanotherapy. Materials and Methods: Study consisted of three types of preadjusted edgewise brackets including ceramic, stainless steel (SS) and self-ligating brackets (0.022" slot, MBT prescription), two types of archwire materials, 0.019 × 0.025" SS and 0.019 × 0.025" Teflon coated (TC) and two types of ligatures including low-friction and conventional elastic ligature. A total of 10 combinations were formed with the above mentioned material. Each combination was tested 10 times on universal testing machine for FR. The data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and unpaired t-tests. Results: Self-ligating brackets exhibited least FR (2.35 ± 0.15N) followed by metal brackets. Ceramic brackets showed the highest FR (7.32 ± 0.10N). In general, the mean value for TC wire was less than that of SS wire indicating low FR possessed by TC wires. Results also showed that low-friction ligatures produce lower-friction when compared with conventional elastic module (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The study demonstrated that self-ligating brackets with TC wire showed the least FR and ceramic brackets with SS wire when ligated with conventional elastic ligature showed the highest FR.http://www.jdrntruhs.org/article.asp?issn=2277-8632;year=2015;volume=4;issue=4;spage=246;epage=252;aulast=SeshamCeramic bracketsfrictional resistanceTeflon coated wires
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vasu Murthy Sesham
Anupriya Jaitly
Lalitha Chigurupati
Praveen Kumar Neela
Pavan Kumar Mamillapalli
Revathi Peddu
spellingShingle Vasu Murthy Sesham
Anupriya Jaitly
Lalitha Chigurupati
Praveen Kumar Neela
Pavan Kumar Mamillapalli
Revathi Peddu
Comparison of frictional resistance between various bracket types and archwire materials ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligatures
Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences
Ceramic brackets
frictional resistance
Teflon coated wires
author_facet Vasu Murthy Sesham
Anupriya Jaitly
Lalitha Chigurupati
Praveen Kumar Neela
Pavan Kumar Mamillapalli
Revathi Peddu
author_sort Vasu Murthy Sesham
title Comparison of frictional resistance between various bracket types and archwire materials ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligatures
title_short Comparison of frictional resistance between various bracket types and archwire materials ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligatures
title_full Comparison of frictional resistance between various bracket types and archwire materials ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligatures
title_fullStr Comparison of frictional resistance between various bracket types and archwire materials ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligatures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of frictional resistance between various bracket types and archwire materials ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligatures
title_sort comparison of frictional resistance between various bracket types and archwire materials ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligatures
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences
issn 2277-8632
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Background: Friction plays a very crucial role in our daily life and orthodontics is no exception. Various materials possess friction of varying intensity, which ultimately affects tooth movement. Aim: The aim was to compare the frictional resistance (FR) between various bracket types and archwire materials when ligated with low-friction and conventional elastic ligatures so as to obtain best bracket-archwire combination possessing least FR for clinicians in achieving optimal mechanotherapy. Materials and Methods: Study consisted of three types of preadjusted edgewise brackets including ceramic, stainless steel (SS) and self-ligating brackets (0.022" slot, MBT prescription), two types of archwire materials, 0.019 × 0.025" SS and 0.019 × 0.025" Teflon coated (TC) and two types of ligatures including low-friction and conventional elastic ligature. A total of 10 combinations were formed with the above mentioned material. Each combination was tested 10 times on universal testing machine for FR. The data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and unpaired t-tests. Results: Self-ligating brackets exhibited least FR (2.35 ± 0.15N) followed by metal brackets. Ceramic brackets showed the highest FR (7.32 ± 0.10N). In general, the mean value for TC wire was less than that of SS wire indicating low FR possessed by TC wires. Results also showed that low-friction ligatures produce lower-friction when compared with conventional elastic module (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The study demonstrated that self-ligating brackets with TC wire showed the least FR and ceramic brackets with SS wire when ligated with conventional elastic ligature showed the highest FR.
topic Ceramic brackets
frictional resistance
Teflon coated wires
url http://www.jdrntruhs.org/article.asp?issn=2277-8632;year=2015;volume=4;issue=4;spage=246;epage=252;aulast=Sesham
work_keys_str_mv AT vasumurthysesham comparisonoffrictionalresistancebetweenvariousbrackettypesandarchwirematerialsligatedwithlowfrictionandconventionalelasticligatures
AT anupriyajaitly comparisonoffrictionalresistancebetweenvariousbrackettypesandarchwirematerialsligatedwithlowfrictionandconventionalelasticligatures
AT lalithachigurupati comparisonoffrictionalresistancebetweenvariousbrackettypesandarchwirematerialsligatedwithlowfrictionandconventionalelasticligatures
AT praveenkumarneela comparisonoffrictionalresistancebetweenvariousbrackettypesandarchwirematerialsligatedwithlowfrictionandconventionalelasticligatures
AT pavankumarmamillapalli comparisonoffrictionalresistancebetweenvariousbrackettypesandarchwirematerialsligatedwithlowfrictionandconventionalelasticligatures
AT revathipeddu comparisonoffrictionalresistancebetweenvariousbrackettypesandarchwirematerialsligatedwithlowfrictionandconventionalelasticligatures
_version_ 1725920560521674752