BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment

Background: Several studies, including a randomized controlled trial by our group, support applying anodal tDCS (A-tDCS) to the left hemisphere during behavioral aphasia treatment to improve outcomes. A clear mechanism explaining A-tDCS's efficacy has not been established, but modulation of neu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julius Fridriksson, Jordan Elm, Brielle C. Stark, Alexandra Basilakos, Chris Rorden, Souvik Sen, Mark S. George, Michelle Gottfried, Leonardo Bonilha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-11-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18302924
id doaj-666b6e7d9bd24b29a5a0b3a9dcf2ffc4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-666b6e7d9bd24b29a5a0b3a9dcf2ffc42021-03-19T07:12:42ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2018-11-0111612761281BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatmentJulius Fridriksson0Jordan Elm1Brielle C. Stark2Alexandra Basilakos3Chris Rorden4Souvik Sen5Mark S. George6Michelle Gottfried7Leonardo Bonilha8Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Carolina, USA; Corresponding author. SmartState, Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Carolina, USA.Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USADepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Carolina, USADepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Carolina, USADepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, USADepartment of Neurology, University of South Carolina, USADepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, USADepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USADepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, USABackground: Several studies, including a randomized controlled trial by our group, support applying anodal tDCS (A-tDCS) to the left hemisphere during behavioral aphasia treatment to improve outcomes. A clear mechanism explaining A-tDCS's efficacy has not been established, but modulation of neuroplasticity may be involved. Objective/hypothesis: The brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene influences neuroplasticity and may modulate the effects of tDCS. Utilizing data from our recently completed trial, we conducted a planned test of whether aphasia treatment outcome is influenced by interaction between A-tDCS and a single-nucleotide polymorphism of the BDNF gene, rs6265. Methods: Seventy-four individuals with chronic stroke-induced aphasia completed 15 language therapy sessions and were randomized to receive 1 mA A-tDCS or sham tDCS (S-tDCS) to the intact left temporoparietal region for the first 20 min of each session. BDNF genotype was available for 67 participants: 37 participants had the typical val/val genotype. The remaining 30 participants had atypical BDNF genotype (Met allele carriers). The primary outcome factor was improvement in object naming at 1 week after treatment completion. Maintenance of treatment effects was evaluated at 4 and 24 weeks. Results: An interaction was revealed between tDCS condition and genotype for treatment-related naming improvement (F = 4.97, p = 0.03). Participants with val/val genotype who received A-tDCS showed greater response to aphasia treatment than val/val participants who received S-tDCS, as well as the Met allele carriers, regardless of tDCS condition. Conclusion: Individuals with the val/val BDNF genotype are more likely to benefit from A-tDCS during aphasia treatment.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18302924AphasiaStroketDCSElectrical brain stimulationRehabilitationAphasia treatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julius Fridriksson
Jordan Elm
Brielle C. Stark
Alexandra Basilakos
Chris Rorden
Souvik Sen
Mark S. George
Michelle Gottfried
Leonardo Bonilha
spellingShingle Julius Fridriksson
Jordan Elm
Brielle C. Stark
Alexandra Basilakos
Chris Rorden
Souvik Sen
Mark S. George
Michelle Gottfried
Leonardo Bonilha
BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment
Brain Stimulation
Aphasia
Stroke
tDCS
Electrical brain stimulation
Rehabilitation
Aphasia treatment
author_facet Julius Fridriksson
Jordan Elm
Brielle C. Stark
Alexandra Basilakos
Chris Rorden
Souvik Sen
Mark S. George
Michelle Gottfried
Leonardo Bonilha
author_sort Julius Fridriksson
title BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment
title_short BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment
title_full BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment
title_fullStr BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment
title_full_unstemmed BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment
title_sort bdnf genotype and tdcs interaction in aphasia treatment
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Background: Several studies, including a randomized controlled trial by our group, support applying anodal tDCS (A-tDCS) to the left hemisphere during behavioral aphasia treatment to improve outcomes. A clear mechanism explaining A-tDCS's efficacy has not been established, but modulation of neuroplasticity may be involved. Objective/hypothesis: The brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene influences neuroplasticity and may modulate the effects of tDCS. Utilizing data from our recently completed trial, we conducted a planned test of whether aphasia treatment outcome is influenced by interaction between A-tDCS and a single-nucleotide polymorphism of the BDNF gene, rs6265. Methods: Seventy-four individuals with chronic stroke-induced aphasia completed 15 language therapy sessions and were randomized to receive 1 mA A-tDCS or sham tDCS (S-tDCS) to the intact left temporoparietal region for the first 20 min of each session. BDNF genotype was available for 67 participants: 37 participants had the typical val/val genotype. The remaining 30 participants had atypical BDNF genotype (Met allele carriers). The primary outcome factor was improvement in object naming at 1 week after treatment completion. Maintenance of treatment effects was evaluated at 4 and 24 weeks. Results: An interaction was revealed between tDCS condition and genotype for treatment-related naming improvement (F = 4.97, p = 0.03). Participants with val/val genotype who received A-tDCS showed greater response to aphasia treatment than val/val participants who received S-tDCS, as well as the Met allele carriers, regardless of tDCS condition. Conclusion: Individuals with the val/val BDNF genotype are more likely to benefit from A-tDCS during aphasia treatment.
topic Aphasia
Stroke
tDCS
Electrical brain stimulation
Rehabilitation
Aphasia treatment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18302924
work_keys_str_mv AT juliusfridriksson bdnfgenotypeandtdcsinteractioninaphasiatreatment
AT jordanelm bdnfgenotypeandtdcsinteractioninaphasiatreatment
AT briellecstark bdnfgenotypeandtdcsinteractioninaphasiatreatment
AT alexandrabasilakos bdnfgenotypeandtdcsinteractioninaphasiatreatment
AT chrisrorden bdnfgenotypeandtdcsinteractioninaphasiatreatment
AT souviksen bdnfgenotypeandtdcsinteractioninaphasiatreatment
AT marksgeorge bdnfgenotypeandtdcsinteractioninaphasiatreatment
AT michellegottfried bdnfgenotypeandtdcsinteractioninaphasiatreatment
AT leonardobonilha bdnfgenotypeandtdcsinteractioninaphasiatreatment
_version_ 1724214068601946112