A micromorphological/microbiological pilot study assessing three methods for the maintenance of the implant patient
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the ultrasonic piezoelectric inserts of EMS Steel Tip A, EMS Peek, and IS‐TiP‐STS‐3E© in reducing peri‐implant bacterial load without compromising the surface of implants during professional oral hygiene in the...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Clinical and Experimental Dental Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.345 |
id |
doaj-66b424fd586042ca80c7386853281457 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-66b424fd586042ca80c73868532814572021-04-05T03:48:07ZengWileyClinical and Experimental Dental Research2057-43472021-04-017215616210.1002/cre2.345A micromorphological/microbiological pilot study assessing three methods for the maintenance of the implant patientElisabetta Polizzi0Bianca D'orto1Simone Tomasi2Giulia Tetè3Department of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital Vita Salute University Milan ItalyDepartment of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital Vita Salute University Milan ItalyFreelance Dental Hygienist Milan ItalyDepartment of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital Vita Salute University Milan ItalyAbstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the ultrasonic piezoelectric inserts of EMS Steel Tip A, EMS Peek, and IS‐TiP‐STS‐3E© in reducing peri‐implant bacterial load without compromising the surface of implants during professional oral hygiene in the follow‐up. Materials and methods Thirteen implants were examined (Winsix, Biosafin, Ancona, Italy). The implants were divided into five groups and analyzed with a SEM microscope and microbiological analysis to evaluate the possible modification of structure and the bacterial load reduction. Results The control and A, B, and C test groups were initially contaminated in vitro with Streptococcus mutans. Subsequently, the A, B, and C test groups were treated by an only expert operator in standard conditions. Test groups A, B, and C were inoculated for 3 hr and, furthermore, microbiologically analyzed. Conclusion The gold standard of an implant maintenance is a significant reduction of the bacterial load without becoming aggressive. According to our results, despite the limitations of the study, the authors recommend the least aggressive IS‐TiP‐STS‐3E©, but combined with an antimicrobial agent to reduce the bacterial load, because the IS‐TiP‐STS‐3E© did not show appreciable results versus the EMS Peek in reducing the bacterial load.https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.345implants surfacemaintenance therapyosteoblastsperi‐implantitispiezoelectric ultrasonic |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elisabetta Polizzi Bianca D'orto Simone Tomasi Giulia Tetè |
spellingShingle |
Elisabetta Polizzi Bianca D'orto Simone Tomasi Giulia Tetè A micromorphological/microbiological pilot study assessing three methods for the maintenance of the implant patient Clinical and Experimental Dental Research implants surface maintenance therapy osteoblasts peri‐implantitis piezoelectric ultrasonic |
author_facet |
Elisabetta Polizzi Bianca D'orto Simone Tomasi Giulia Tetè |
author_sort |
Elisabetta Polizzi |
title |
A micromorphological/microbiological pilot study assessing three methods for the maintenance of the implant patient |
title_short |
A micromorphological/microbiological pilot study assessing three methods for the maintenance of the implant patient |
title_full |
A micromorphological/microbiological pilot study assessing three methods for the maintenance of the implant patient |
title_fullStr |
A micromorphological/microbiological pilot study assessing three methods for the maintenance of the implant patient |
title_full_unstemmed |
A micromorphological/microbiological pilot study assessing three methods for the maintenance of the implant patient |
title_sort |
micromorphological/microbiological pilot study assessing three methods for the maintenance of the implant patient |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research |
issn |
2057-4347 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the ultrasonic piezoelectric inserts of EMS Steel Tip A, EMS Peek, and IS‐TiP‐STS‐3E© in reducing peri‐implant bacterial load without compromising the surface of implants during professional oral hygiene in the follow‐up. Materials and methods Thirteen implants were examined (Winsix, Biosafin, Ancona, Italy). The implants were divided into five groups and analyzed with a SEM microscope and microbiological analysis to evaluate the possible modification of structure and the bacterial load reduction. Results The control and A, B, and C test groups were initially contaminated in vitro with Streptococcus mutans. Subsequently, the A, B, and C test groups were treated by an only expert operator in standard conditions. Test groups A, B, and C were inoculated for 3 hr and, furthermore, microbiologically analyzed. Conclusion The gold standard of an implant maintenance is a significant reduction of the bacterial load without becoming aggressive. According to our results, despite the limitations of the study, the authors recommend the least aggressive IS‐TiP‐STS‐3E©, but combined with an antimicrobial agent to reduce the bacterial load, because the IS‐TiP‐STS‐3E© did not show appreciable results versus the EMS Peek in reducing the bacterial load. |
topic |
implants surface maintenance therapy osteoblasts peri‐implantitis piezoelectric ultrasonic |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.345 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elisabettapolizzi amicromorphologicalmicrobiologicalpilotstudyassessingthreemethodsforthemaintenanceoftheimplantpatient AT biancadorto amicromorphologicalmicrobiologicalpilotstudyassessingthreemethodsforthemaintenanceoftheimplantpatient AT simonetomasi amicromorphologicalmicrobiologicalpilotstudyassessingthreemethodsforthemaintenanceoftheimplantpatient AT giuliatete amicromorphologicalmicrobiologicalpilotstudyassessingthreemethodsforthemaintenanceoftheimplantpatient AT elisabettapolizzi micromorphologicalmicrobiologicalpilotstudyassessingthreemethodsforthemaintenanceoftheimplantpatient AT biancadorto micromorphologicalmicrobiologicalpilotstudyassessingthreemethodsforthemaintenanceoftheimplantpatient AT simonetomasi micromorphologicalmicrobiologicalpilotstudyassessingthreemethodsforthemaintenanceoftheimplantpatient AT giuliatete micromorphologicalmicrobiologicalpilotstudyassessingthreemethodsforthemaintenanceoftheimplantpatient |
_version_ |
1721541321350447104 |