Outcomes of Full-Right-Full-Left Split Liver Transplantation in Adults in the USA: A Propensity- Score Matched Analysis

Background: Splitting a liver for utilization in adult/pediatric recipients has been shown to decrease mortality on the wait list without increasing the overall risk of long-term graft failure compared to a whole graft. However, splitting a single donor organ for two adult recipients, full-right-ful...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A Zimmerman, JM Flahive, M Hertl, AB Cosimi, RF Saidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2016-04-01
Series:International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijotm.com/ojs/index.php/IJOTM/article/view/353
id doaj-66c49e74390a4332afa4aceeee4a9f1e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-66c49e74390a4332afa4aceeee4a9f1e2020-11-24T21:53:44ZengShiraz University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine2008-64822008-64902016-04-0172211Outcomes of Full-Right-Full-Left Split Liver Transplantation in Adults in the USA: A Propensity- Score Matched AnalysisA Zimmerman0JM Flahive1M Hertl2AB Cosimi3RF Saidi4Division of Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USACenter for Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USADivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USATransplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USADivision of Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USABackground: Splitting a liver for utilization in adult/pediatric recipients has been shown to decrease mortality on the wait list without increasing the overall risk of long-term graft failure compared to a whole graft. However, splitting a single donor organ for two adult recipients, full-right-full-left split liver transplantation (FRFLSLT), to overcome organ shortage is still considered controversial. Objective: This study assessed the outcome of FRFLSLT comparing full-right (FR) and full-left (FL) with whole liver (WL) allografts in adults (1998–2010) using UNOS standard transplant analysis and research (STAR) file. Methods: Unadjusted allograft and patient survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Adjusted analyses of survival were conducted controlling for propensity for WL allograft. Results: There were 83,313 cases of WL, 651 FR and 117 FL. Significant differences were evident in the unadjusted cohort between recipients who received FR and FL including donor, cold ischemic time, and days on transplant waiting list. Use of FL allograft resulted in a trend toward lower graft and patient survival compared to WL and FR, which was not statistically significant (p=0.07). In the matched cohort, FL hemiliver allograft had no detrimental effect on the allograft or patient survival after split liver transplantation when compared to FR and WL. Conclusion: After adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics, there was no difference in allograft or patient survival with the use of FL, FR, or WL after liver transplantation in adults. FRFLSLT is a valuable and safe option to expand the donor pool.http://www.ijotm.com/ojs/index.php/IJOTM/article/view/353Liver transplantationWaiting ListsMortalityAllograft survivalPatient survivalSurvival analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A Zimmerman
JM Flahive
M Hertl
AB Cosimi
RF Saidi
spellingShingle A Zimmerman
JM Flahive
M Hertl
AB Cosimi
RF Saidi
Outcomes of Full-Right-Full-Left Split Liver Transplantation in Adults in the USA: A Propensity- Score Matched Analysis
International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine
Liver transplantation
Waiting Lists
Mortality
Allograft survival
Patient survival
Survival analysis
author_facet A Zimmerman
JM Flahive
M Hertl
AB Cosimi
RF Saidi
author_sort A Zimmerman
title Outcomes of Full-Right-Full-Left Split Liver Transplantation in Adults in the USA: A Propensity- Score Matched Analysis
title_short Outcomes of Full-Right-Full-Left Split Liver Transplantation in Adults in the USA: A Propensity- Score Matched Analysis
title_full Outcomes of Full-Right-Full-Left Split Liver Transplantation in Adults in the USA: A Propensity- Score Matched Analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes of Full-Right-Full-Left Split Liver Transplantation in Adults in the USA: A Propensity- Score Matched Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Full-Right-Full-Left Split Liver Transplantation in Adults in the USA: A Propensity- Score Matched Analysis
title_sort outcomes of full-right-full-left split liver transplantation in adults in the usa: a propensity- score matched analysis
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
series International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine
issn 2008-6482
2008-6490
publishDate 2016-04-01
description Background: Splitting a liver for utilization in adult/pediatric recipients has been shown to decrease mortality on the wait list without increasing the overall risk of long-term graft failure compared to a whole graft. However, splitting a single donor organ for two adult recipients, full-right-full-left split liver transplantation (FRFLSLT), to overcome organ shortage is still considered controversial. Objective: This study assessed the outcome of FRFLSLT comparing full-right (FR) and full-left (FL) with whole liver (WL) allografts in adults (1998–2010) using UNOS standard transplant analysis and research (STAR) file. Methods: Unadjusted allograft and patient survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Adjusted analyses of survival were conducted controlling for propensity for WL allograft. Results: There were 83,313 cases of WL, 651 FR and 117 FL. Significant differences were evident in the unadjusted cohort between recipients who received FR and FL including donor, cold ischemic time, and days on transplant waiting list. Use of FL allograft resulted in a trend toward lower graft and patient survival compared to WL and FR, which was not statistically significant (p=0.07). In the matched cohort, FL hemiliver allograft had no detrimental effect on the allograft or patient survival after split liver transplantation when compared to FR and WL. Conclusion: After adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics, there was no difference in allograft or patient survival with the use of FL, FR, or WL after liver transplantation in adults. FRFLSLT is a valuable and safe option to expand the donor pool.
topic Liver transplantation
Waiting Lists
Mortality
Allograft survival
Patient survival
Survival analysis
url http://www.ijotm.com/ojs/index.php/IJOTM/article/view/353
work_keys_str_mv AT azimmerman outcomesoffullrightfullleftsplitlivertransplantationinadultsintheusaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT jmflahive outcomesoffullrightfullleftsplitlivertransplantationinadultsintheusaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT mhertl outcomesoffullrightfullleftsplitlivertransplantationinadultsintheusaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT abcosimi outcomesoffullrightfullleftsplitlivertransplantationinadultsintheusaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT rfsaidi outcomesoffullrightfullleftsplitlivertransplantationinadultsintheusaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
_version_ 1725870476552568832