Craniofacial Osteosarcoma—Pilot Study on the Expression of Osteobiologic Characteristics and Hypothesis on Metastasis

Background: Craniofacial osteosarcomas (COS) and extracranial osteosarcomas (EOS) show distinct clinical differences. COS show a remarkably lower incidence of metastases and a better survival. However, in contrast to EOS, they show a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor-associated macrop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel Weber, Stephan Söder, Janina Sander, Jutta Ries, Carol Geppert, Marco Kesting, Falk Wehrhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
M1
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00745/full
id doaj-66c85da75a5f4bc392b016fac13de7df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-66c85da75a5f4bc392b016fac13de7df2020-11-25T03:47:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-06-011010.3389/fonc.2020.00745490347Craniofacial Osteosarcoma—Pilot Study on the Expression of Osteobiologic Characteristics and Hypothesis on MetastasisManuel Weber0Stephan Söder1Janina Sander2Jutta Ries3Carol Geppert4Marco Kesting5Falk Wehrhan6Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyInstitute of Pathology, Fürth, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyBackground: Craniofacial osteosarcomas (COS) and extracranial osteosarcomas (EOS) show distinct clinical differences. COS show a remarkably lower incidence of metastases and a better survival. However, in contrast to EOS, they show a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor-associated macrophages and their polarization as well as developmental biological signaling pathways are possible candidates for explaining the clinical differences between COS and EOS. The aim of the study was to analyze differential expression of macrophage markers and important regulators of these pathways.Methods: Twenty osteosarcoma cases (10 COS and 10 EOS) were immunohistochemically stained to assess CD68, CD11c, CD163, MRC1, Gli1, and Gli2 expression. Statistical differences between COS and EOS were tested using the Mann–Whitney U test. Additionally, the paper describes an example of multidisciplinary treatment of a patient suffering from COS and discusses the surgical challenges in treatment and rehabilitation of COS.Results: COS showed a significantly (p < 0.05) increased infiltration of CD11c-positive M1 macrophages and a shift toward M1 polarization compared to EOS. Additionally, COS revealed a significantly (p < 0.05) lower Gli1 expression than EOS.Conclusion: The reduced Gli1 expression in COS can be interpreted as reduced activation of the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway. The increased M1 polarization and reduced Hh activation in COS could explain the low incidence of metastases in these osteosarcomas.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00745/fullcraniofacial osteosarcomaosteosarcoma of the jawhedgehogmacrophage polarizationGli1M1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manuel Weber
Stephan Söder
Janina Sander
Jutta Ries
Carol Geppert
Marco Kesting
Falk Wehrhan
spellingShingle Manuel Weber
Stephan Söder
Janina Sander
Jutta Ries
Carol Geppert
Marco Kesting
Falk Wehrhan
Craniofacial Osteosarcoma—Pilot Study on the Expression of Osteobiologic Characteristics and Hypothesis on Metastasis
Frontiers in Oncology
craniofacial osteosarcoma
osteosarcoma of the jaw
hedgehog
macrophage polarization
Gli1
M1
author_facet Manuel Weber
Stephan Söder
Janina Sander
Jutta Ries
Carol Geppert
Marco Kesting
Falk Wehrhan
author_sort Manuel Weber
title Craniofacial Osteosarcoma—Pilot Study on the Expression of Osteobiologic Characteristics and Hypothesis on Metastasis
title_short Craniofacial Osteosarcoma—Pilot Study on the Expression of Osteobiologic Characteristics and Hypothesis on Metastasis
title_full Craniofacial Osteosarcoma—Pilot Study on the Expression of Osteobiologic Characteristics and Hypothesis on Metastasis
title_fullStr Craniofacial Osteosarcoma—Pilot Study on the Expression of Osteobiologic Characteristics and Hypothesis on Metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Craniofacial Osteosarcoma—Pilot Study on the Expression of Osteobiologic Characteristics and Hypothesis on Metastasis
title_sort craniofacial osteosarcoma—pilot study on the expression of osteobiologic characteristics and hypothesis on metastasis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background: Craniofacial osteosarcomas (COS) and extracranial osteosarcomas (EOS) show distinct clinical differences. COS show a remarkably lower incidence of metastases and a better survival. However, in contrast to EOS, they show a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor-associated macrophages and their polarization as well as developmental biological signaling pathways are possible candidates for explaining the clinical differences between COS and EOS. The aim of the study was to analyze differential expression of macrophage markers and important regulators of these pathways.Methods: Twenty osteosarcoma cases (10 COS and 10 EOS) were immunohistochemically stained to assess CD68, CD11c, CD163, MRC1, Gli1, and Gli2 expression. Statistical differences between COS and EOS were tested using the Mann–Whitney U test. Additionally, the paper describes an example of multidisciplinary treatment of a patient suffering from COS and discusses the surgical challenges in treatment and rehabilitation of COS.Results: COS showed a significantly (p < 0.05) increased infiltration of CD11c-positive M1 macrophages and a shift toward M1 polarization compared to EOS. Additionally, COS revealed a significantly (p < 0.05) lower Gli1 expression than EOS.Conclusion: The reduced Gli1 expression in COS can be interpreted as reduced activation of the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway. The increased M1 polarization and reduced Hh activation in COS could explain the low incidence of metastases in these osteosarcomas.
topic craniofacial osteosarcoma
osteosarcoma of the jaw
hedgehog
macrophage polarization
Gli1
M1
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00745/full
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelweber craniofacialosteosarcomapilotstudyontheexpressionofosteobiologiccharacteristicsandhypothesisonmetastasis
AT stephansoder craniofacialosteosarcomapilotstudyontheexpressionofosteobiologiccharacteristicsandhypothesisonmetastasis
AT janinasander craniofacialosteosarcomapilotstudyontheexpressionofosteobiologiccharacteristicsandhypothesisonmetastasis
AT juttaries craniofacialosteosarcomapilotstudyontheexpressionofosteobiologiccharacteristicsandhypothesisonmetastasis
AT carolgeppert craniofacialosteosarcomapilotstudyontheexpressionofosteobiologiccharacteristicsandhypothesisonmetastasis
AT marcokesting craniofacialosteosarcomapilotstudyontheexpressionofosteobiologiccharacteristicsandhypothesisonmetastasis
AT falkwehrhan craniofacialosteosarcomapilotstudyontheexpressionofosteobiologiccharacteristicsandhypothesisonmetastasis
_version_ 1724502750517002240