Comparing the efficacy of leishman–giemsa cocktail stain, giemsa stain, and papanicolaou stain in potentially malignant oral lesions: A study on 540 cytological samples

Background: This study was planned to compare and evaluate the staining efficacy of Leishman–Giemsa cocktail (LG), Papanicolaou, and Giemsa stain (G) in potentially malignant disorders and malignant lesions. Aims: To evaluate the quality of nuclear and cytoplasmic staining of LG with G, and rapid Pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Supreet K Sidhu, Karthikeyan Ramalingam, Sandeep Goyal, Monika Poonia, Gaurav S Rajawat, Nitish Sharma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Cytology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2018;volume=35;issue=2;spage=105;epage=109;aulast=Sidhu
id doaj-66ce398f66ec4859803c3eb751e1e1f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-66ce398f66ec4859803c3eb751e1e1f42020-11-24T23:24:29ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Cytology0970-93712018-01-0135210510910.4103/JOC.JOC_249_16Comparing the efficacy of leishman–giemsa cocktail stain, giemsa stain, and papanicolaou stain in potentially malignant oral lesions: A study on 540 cytological samplesSupreet K SidhuKarthikeyan RamalingamSandeep GoyalMonika PooniaGaurav S RajawatNitish SharmaBackground: This study was planned to compare and evaluate the staining efficacy of Leishman–Giemsa cocktail (LG), Papanicolaou, and Giemsa stain (G) in potentially malignant disorders and malignant lesions. Aims: To evaluate the quality of nuclear and cytoplasmic staining of LG with G, and rapid Papanicolaou stain (Pap) and to compare the total staining efficiency of LG against G and P. Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighty participants were studied under three groups – 60 as healthy controls, 60 with potentially malignant disorders, and 60 with malignant lesions; smears were taken thrice from the buccal mucosa. One smear was fixed with Bio-Fix spray and other two smears were allowed to air dry for 2–3 minutes. Then, the ethyl alcohol-fixed smear was stained with Pap and the two other air-dried smears were stained with G and LG stains. Analysis was done using Friedman test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with SPSS Version 15.0. Results: In the normal group, staining of LG was highly significant (P < 0.001). Among potentially malignant lesions, LG was observed to be highly significant (P < 0.001) when compared with G and was not significant when compared with Pap (P = 0.186). In the malignant group, LG was highly significant (P < 0.001). LG was superior with the highest average staining score of (2.018) than Pap and G. Conclusion: LG cocktail is a better stain with excellent cytoplasmic and nuclear staining intensity compared to Pap and G stains.http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2018;volume=35;issue=2;spage=105;epage=109;aulast=SidhuExfoliative cytologyGiemsa stainLeishman–Giemsa cocktail stainrapid Papanicolaou methodstaining efficiency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Supreet K Sidhu
Karthikeyan Ramalingam
Sandeep Goyal
Monika Poonia
Gaurav S Rajawat
Nitish Sharma
spellingShingle Supreet K Sidhu
Karthikeyan Ramalingam
Sandeep Goyal
Monika Poonia
Gaurav S Rajawat
Nitish Sharma
Comparing the efficacy of leishman–giemsa cocktail stain, giemsa stain, and papanicolaou stain in potentially malignant oral lesions: A study on 540 cytological samples
Journal of Cytology
Exfoliative cytology
Giemsa stain
Leishman–Giemsa cocktail stain
rapid Papanicolaou method
staining efficiency
author_facet Supreet K Sidhu
Karthikeyan Ramalingam
Sandeep Goyal
Monika Poonia
Gaurav S Rajawat
Nitish Sharma
author_sort Supreet K Sidhu
title Comparing the efficacy of leishman–giemsa cocktail stain, giemsa stain, and papanicolaou stain in potentially malignant oral lesions: A study on 540 cytological samples
title_short Comparing the efficacy of leishman–giemsa cocktail stain, giemsa stain, and papanicolaou stain in potentially malignant oral lesions: A study on 540 cytological samples
title_full Comparing the efficacy of leishman–giemsa cocktail stain, giemsa stain, and papanicolaou stain in potentially malignant oral lesions: A study on 540 cytological samples
title_fullStr Comparing the efficacy of leishman–giemsa cocktail stain, giemsa stain, and papanicolaou stain in potentially malignant oral lesions: A study on 540 cytological samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the efficacy of leishman–giemsa cocktail stain, giemsa stain, and papanicolaou stain in potentially malignant oral lesions: A study on 540 cytological samples
title_sort comparing the efficacy of leishman–giemsa cocktail stain, giemsa stain, and papanicolaou stain in potentially malignant oral lesions: a study on 540 cytological samples
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Cytology
issn 0970-9371
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background: This study was planned to compare and evaluate the staining efficacy of Leishman–Giemsa cocktail (LG), Papanicolaou, and Giemsa stain (G) in potentially malignant disorders and malignant lesions. Aims: To evaluate the quality of nuclear and cytoplasmic staining of LG with G, and rapid Papanicolaou stain (Pap) and to compare the total staining efficiency of LG against G and P. Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighty participants were studied under three groups – 60 as healthy controls, 60 with potentially malignant disorders, and 60 with malignant lesions; smears were taken thrice from the buccal mucosa. One smear was fixed with Bio-Fix spray and other two smears were allowed to air dry for 2–3 minutes. Then, the ethyl alcohol-fixed smear was stained with Pap and the two other air-dried smears were stained with G and LG stains. Analysis was done using Friedman test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with SPSS Version 15.0. Results: In the normal group, staining of LG was highly significant (P < 0.001). Among potentially malignant lesions, LG was observed to be highly significant (P < 0.001) when compared with G and was not significant when compared with Pap (P = 0.186). In the malignant group, LG was highly significant (P < 0.001). LG was superior with the highest average staining score of (2.018) than Pap and G. Conclusion: LG cocktail is a better stain with excellent cytoplasmic and nuclear staining intensity compared to Pap and G stains.
topic Exfoliative cytology
Giemsa stain
Leishman–Giemsa cocktail stain
rapid Papanicolaou method
staining efficiency
url http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2018;volume=35;issue=2;spage=105;epage=109;aulast=Sidhu
work_keys_str_mv AT supreetksidhu comparingtheefficacyofleishmangiemsacocktailstaingiemsastainandpapanicolaoustaininpotentiallymalignantorallesionsastudyon540cytologicalsamples
AT karthikeyanramalingam comparingtheefficacyofleishmangiemsacocktailstaingiemsastainandpapanicolaoustaininpotentiallymalignantorallesionsastudyon540cytologicalsamples
AT sandeepgoyal comparingtheefficacyofleishmangiemsacocktailstaingiemsastainandpapanicolaoustaininpotentiallymalignantorallesionsastudyon540cytologicalsamples
AT monikapoonia comparingtheefficacyofleishmangiemsacocktailstaingiemsastainandpapanicolaoustaininpotentiallymalignantorallesionsastudyon540cytologicalsamples
AT gauravsrajawat comparingtheefficacyofleishmangiemsacocktailstaingiemsastainandpapanicolaoustaininpotentiallymalignantorallesionsastudyon540cytologicalsamples
AT nitishsharma comparingtheefficacyofleishmangiemsacocktailstaingiemsastainandpapanicolaoustaininpotentiallymalignantorallesionsastudyon540cytologicalsamples
_version_ 1725560450561605632