The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea

Crimea’s secession from Ukraine and its annexation to the Russian Federation invoked Kosovo precedent, in its declaration of independence, as an argument for secession. The territorial referendum in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, only five days after the declaration of independence, was an attem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dr.Sc. Elvina Jusufaj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Felix-Verlag 2015-06-01
Series:ILIRIA International Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://iliriapublications.org/index.php/iir/article/view/20
id doaj-671f6f129cc141f0bb4e136d5107efe1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-671f6f129cc141f0bb4e136d5107efe12020-11-25T02:30:57ZengFelix-VerlagILIRIA International Review2192-70812365-85922015-06-015126728610.21113/iir.v5i1.2020The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of CrimeaDr.Sc. Elvina JusufajCrimea’s secession from Ukraine and its annexation to the Russian Federation invoked Kosovo precedent, in its declaration of independence, as an argument for secession. The territorial referendum in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, only five days after the declaration of independence, was an attempt to justify the secession based on the right to selfdetermination of the people of Crimea. It is overwhelmingly considered illegal and its outcome has not been accepted and recognized by states, regional and international organizations. The comparative elements of statehood and secession between Kosovo and Crimea are reflected through analyzing the declarations of independence, international recognition and Russia’s role as a third-state factor in external selfdetermination. Essential distinctions are highlighted. Kosovo is widely acknowledged and accepted a sui generis case. Its declaration of independence came as result of a long monitored comprehensive process; not to legitimize the right for self-determination but as the final option for stability and peace in the region. Crimea seceded in violation of international law through the use of force. While Kosovo is a democratic, multi-ethnic new state and recognized by 107 states, the secession of Crimea and its annexation to the Russian Federation is considered illegal and endangers the existing international order.http://iliriapublications.org/index.php/iir/article/view/20CrimeaDeclaration of IndependenceKosovoRecognition Secession
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dr.Sc. Elvina Jusufaj
spellingShingle Dr.Sc. Elvina Jusufaj
The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea
ILIRIA International Review
Crimea
Declaration of Independence
Kosovo
Recognition Secession
author_facet Dr.Sc. Elvina Jusufaj
author_sort Dr.Sc. Elvina Jusufaj
title The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea
title_short The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea
title_full The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea
title_fullStr The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea
title_full_unstemmed The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea
title_sort kosovo precedent in the secession and recognition of crimea
publisher Felix-Verlag
series ILIRIA International Review
issn 2192-7081
2365-8592
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Crimea’s secession from Ukraine and its annexation to the Russian Federation invoked Kosovo precedent, in its declaration of independence, as an argument for secession. The territorial referendum in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, only five days after the declaration of independence, was an attempt to justify the secession based on the right to selfdetermination of the people of Crimea. It is overwhelmingly considered illegal and its outcome has not been accepted and recognized by states, regional and international organizations. The comparative elements of statehood and secession between Kosovo and Crimea are reflected through analyzing the declarations of independence, international recognition and Russia’s role as a third-state factor in external selfdetermination. Essential distinctions are highlighted. Kosovo is widely acknowledged and accepted a sui generis case. Its declaration of independence came as result of a long monitored comprehensive process; not to legitimize the right for self-determination but as the final option for stability and peace in the region. Crimea seceded in violation of international law through the use of force. While Kosovo is a democratic, multi-ethnic new state and recognized by 107 states, the secession of Crimea and its annexation to the Russian Federation is considered illegal and endangers the existing international order.
topic Crimea
Declaration of Independence
Kosovo
Recognition Secession
url http://iliriapublications.org/index.php/iir/article/view/20
work_keys_str_mv AT drscelvinajusufaj thekosovoprecedentinthesecessionandrecognitionofcrimea
AT drscelvinajusufaj kosovoprecedentinthesecessionandrecognitionofcrimea
_version_ 1724826664656961536