In the Indelible Footprints of Truth: Writing Narrative History, Finding Historical Narrative

Abstract: This paper analyzes varying methodological approaches to the transference of both testimony and artifact in constructing written history. It follows two contemporary texts, each of which attempts to accurately and sympathetically portray the lives of specific Jewish families in the peri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gregory Dekter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hyperion University 2014-10-01
Series:HyperCultura
Subjects:
Online Access:http://litere.hyperion.ro/hypercultura/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Dekter-Gregory.pdf
id doaj-67381a99b29149108856dd70c6b993fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67381a99b29149108856dd70c6b993fc2020-11-24T21:32:32ZengHyperion UniversityHyperCultura2559-20252014-10-0132110In the Indelible Footprints of Truth: Writing Narrative History, Finding Historical NarrativeGregory Dekter 0New York UniversityAbstract: This paper analyzes varying methodological approaches to the transference of both testimony and artifact in constructing written history. It follows two contemporary texts, each of which attempts to accurately and sympathetically portray the lives of specific Jewish families in the periods prior to and during the Second World War. The fundamental question of the paper has to do with determining the degree to which an author/historian may emplot himself/herself or his/her subjective voice into an explication of historical events, while maintaining fidelity to those events. In Hayden White’s terms, this constitutes “the fiction of factual representation”, that is, “the extent to which the discourse of the historian and that of the imaginative writer overlap”. Only by contrasting texts that operate differently - a mostly traditional historical approach set against a modern narrative approach - can we develop a vocabulary for tracking memory and postmemory transference. This paper, configured as a comparative textual analysis, shows that a delicate balance between objective data and subjective insight is the only viable way to extract clarity from what we understand as collective memory.http://litere.hyperion.ro/hypercultura/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Dekter-Gregory.pdfpostmemoryemplotmentmemoirnarrative historySecond World War
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gregory Dekter
spellingShingle Gregory Dekter
In the Indelible Footprints of Truth: Writing Narrative History, Finding Historical Narrative
HyperCultura
postmemory
emplotment
memoir
narrative history
Second World War
author_facet Gregory Dekter
author_sort Gregory Dekter
title In the Indelible Footprints of Truth: Writing Narrative History, Finding Historical Narrative
title_short In the Indelible Footprints of Truth: Writing Narrative History, Finding Historical Narrative
title_full In the Indelible Footprints of Truth: Writing Narrative History, Finding Historical Narrative
title_fullStr In the Indelible Footprints of Truth: Writing Narrative History, Finding Historical Narrative
title_full_unstemmed In the Indelible Footprints of Truth: Writing Narrative History, Finding Historical Narrative
title_sort in the indelible footprints of truth: writing narrative history, finding historical narrative
publisher Hyperion University
series HyperCultura
issn 2559-2025
publishDate 2014-10-01
description Abstract: This paper analyzes varying methodological approaches to the transference of both testimony and artifact in constructing written history. It follows two contemporary texts, each of which attempts to accurately and sympathetically portray the lives of specific Jewish families in the periods prior to and during the Second World War. The fundamental question of the paper has to do with determining the degree to which an author/historian may emplot himself/herself or his/her subjective voice into an explication of historical events, while maintaining fidelity to those events. In Hayden White’s terms, this constitutes “the fiction of factual representation”, that is, “the extent to which the discourse of the historian and that of the imaginative writer overlap”. Only by contrasting texts that operate differently - a mostly traditional historical approach set against a modern narrative approach - can we develop a vocabulary for tracking memory and postmemory transference. This paper, configured as a comparative textual analysis, shows that a delicate balance between objective data and subjective insight is the only viable way to extract clarity from what we understand as collective memory.
topic postmemory
emplotment
memoir
narrative history
Second World War
url http://litere.hyperion.ro/hypercultura/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Dekter-Gregory.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorydekter intheindeliblefootprintsoftruthwritingnarrativehistoryfindinghistoricalnarrative
_version_ 1725957102172635136