Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak

In analyzing the distinction between flak and scandal, this investigation focuses on the discourse around Solyndra in 2011–2012 on two media platforms. Solyndra was a solar panel firm that went bankrupt after receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (‘The Stimulus’) funds. The analysis shows...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brian Michael Goss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2021-04-01
Series:Media and Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3692
id doaj-674e7cbf3c654858a2b66a90885057dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-674e7cbf3c654858a2b66a90885057dd2021-04-06T10:35:26ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392021-04-0192889710.17645/mac.v9i2.36921928Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as FlakBrian Michael Goss0Department of Communication, Saint Louis University—Madrid Campus, SpainIn analyzing the distinction between flak and scandal, this investigation focuses on the discourse around Solyndra in 2011–2012 on two media platforms. Solyndra was a solar panel firm that went bankrupt after receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (‘The Stimulus’) funds. The analysis shows that National Review—a rightwing journal of opinion that increasingly operates as an online platform—unswervingly utilized the Solyndra bankruptcy as an instrument of political combat. Following flak lines rehearsed by Republicans in congressional hearings, National Review narrated Solyndra as scandalous evidence of the Obama administration’s putative ineptitude and/or criminality that, moreover, discredited the efficacy of green energy. The performance of the mainstream newspaper The Washington Post presented a grab-bag mix as its objective methods insinuated flak packaged as scandal into stories when they followed Republican talking points. At the same time, The Washington Post’s discourse noted that no evidence of administration corruption was discovered despite extensive investigation and that government intervention into the economy is often highly beneficial.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3692democratsflaknational reviewpolitical scandalrepublicanssolyndrathe washington post
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brian Michael Goss
spellingShingle Brian Michael Goss
Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak
Media and Communication
democrats
flak
national review
political scandal
republicans
solyndra
the washington post
author_facet Brian Michael Goss
author_sort Brian Michael Goss
title Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak
title_short Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak
title_full Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak
title_fullStr Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak
title_full_unstemmed Making Watergate “Look Like Child’s Play”: The Solyndra Discourse (2011–2012) as Flak
title_sort making watergate “look like child’s play”: the solyndra discourse (2011–2012) as flak
publisher Cogitatio
series Media and Communication
issn 2183-2439
publishDate 2021-04-01
description In analyzing the distinction between flak and scandal, this investigation focuses on the discourse around Solyndra in 2011–2012 on two media platforms. Solyndra was a solar panel firm that went bankrupt after receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (‘The Stimulus’) funds. The analysis shows that National Review—a rightwing journal of opinion that increasingly operates as an online platform—unswervingly utilized the Solyndra bankruptcy as an instrument of political combat. Following flak lines rehearsed by Republicans in congressional hearings, National Review narrated Solyndra as scandalous evidence of the Obama administration’s putative ineptitude and/or criminality that, moreover, discredited the efficacy of green energy. The performance of the mainstream newspaper The Washington Post presented a grab-bag mix as its objective methods insinuated flak packaged as scandal into stories when they followed Republican talking points. At the same time, The Washington Post’s discourse noted that no evidence of administration corruption was discovered despite extensive investigation and that government intervention into the economy is often highly beneficial.
topic democrats
flak
national review
political scandal
republicans
solyndra
the washington post
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3692
work_keys_str_mv AT brianmichaelgoss makingwatergatelooklikechildsplaythesolyndradiscourse20112012asflak
_version_ 1721538329234636800