Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance

The 2018 CrossFit Open (CFO) was the initial stage of an annual competition that consisted of five weekly workouts. Current evidence suggests that a variety of fitness parameters are important for progressing beyond this stage, but little is known about which are the most important. To examine relat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerald T. Mangine, Joy E. Tankersley, Jacob M. McDougle, Nathanael Velazquez, Michael D. Roberts, Tiffany A. Esmat, Trisha A. VanDusseldorp, Yuri Feito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Sports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/8/7/102
id doaj-6771b97aef1441f6aa6d7de9952e4145
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6771b97aef1441f6aa6d7de9952e41452020-11-25T03:06:47ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632020-07-01810210210.3390/sports8070102Predictors of CrossFit Open PerformanceGerald T. Mangine0Joy E. Tankersley1Jacob M. McDougle2Nathanael Velazquez3Michael D. Roberts4Tiffany A. Esmat5Trisha A. VanDusseldorp6Yuri Feito7Department of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USADepartment of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USADepartment of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USADepartment of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USASchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USADepartment of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USADepartment of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USADepartment of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USAThe 2018 CrossFit Open (CFO) was the initial stage of an annual competition that consisted of five weekly workouts. Current evidence suggests that a variety of fitness parameters are important for progressing beyond this stage, but little is known about which are the most important. To examine relationships between CFO performance, experience, and physiological fitness, sixteen experienced (>2 years) athletes (30.7 ± 6.9 years, 171 ± 12 cm, 78.0 ± 16.2 kg) volunteered to provide information about their training and competitive history, and then complete a battery of physiological assessments prior to competing in the 2018 CFO. Athletes’ resting energy expenditure, hormone concentrations, body composition, muscle morphology, cardiorespiratory fitness, and isometric strength were assessed on two separate occasions. Spearman correlations demonstrated significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) relationships between most variables and performance on each workout. Stepwise regression revealed competition experience (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.31–0.63), body composition (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55–0.80), vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.29–0.89), respiratory compensation threshold (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.54–0.75), and rate of force development (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.30–0.76) to be the most common predictors. Of these, body composition was the most important. These fitness parameters are known targets with established training recommendations. Though preliminary, athletes may use these data to effectively train for CFO competition.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/8/7/102high intensity functional trainingathletecritical poweraerobic capacityultrasound
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gerald T. Mangine
Joy E. Tankersley
Jacob M. McDougle
Nathanael Velazquez
Michael D. Roberts
Tiffany A. Esmat
Trisha A. VanDusseldorp
Yuri Feito
spellingShingle Gerald T. Mangine
Joy E. Tankersley
Jacob M. McDougle
Nathanael Velazquez
Michael D. Roberts
Tiffany A. Esmat
Trisha A. VanDusseldorp
Yuri Feito
Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance
Sports
high intensity functional training
athlete
critical power
aerobic capacity
ultrasound
author_facet Gerald T. Mangine
Joy E. Tankersley
Jacob M. McDougle
Nathanael Velazquez
Michael D. Roberts
Tiffany A. Esmat
Trisha A. VanDusseldorp
Yuri Feito
author_sort Gerald T. Mangine
title Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance
title_short Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance
title_full Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance
title_fullStr Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance
title_sort predictors of crossfit open performance
publisher MDPI AG
series Sports
issn 2075-4663
publishDate 2020-07-01
description The 2018 CrossFit Open (CFO) was the initial stage of an annual competition that consisted of five weekly workouts. Current evidence suggests that a variety of fitness parameters are important for progressing beyond this stage, but little is known about which are the most important. To examine relationships between CFO performance, experience, and physiological fitness, sixteen experienced (>2 years) athletes (30.7 ± 6.9 years, 171 ± 12 cm, 78.0 ± 16.2 kg) volunteered to provide information about their training and competitive history, and then complete a battery of physiological assessments prior to competing in the 2018 CFO. Athletes’ resting energy expenditure, hormone concentrations, body composition, muscle morphology, cardiorespiratory fitness, and isometric strength were assessed on two separate occasions. Spearman correlations demonstrated significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) relationships between most variables and performance on each workout. Stepwise regression revealed competition experience (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.31–0.63), body composition (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55–0.80), vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.29–0.89), respiratory compensation threshold (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.54–0.75), and rate of force development (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.30–0.76) to be the most common predictors. Of these, body composition was the most important. These fitness parameters are known targets with established training recommendations. Though preliminary, athletes may use these data to effectively train for CFO competition.
topic high intensity functional training
athlete
critical power
aerobic capacity
ultrasound
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/8/7/102
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldtmangine predictorsofcrossfitopenperformance
AT joyetankersley predictorsofcrossfitopenperformance
AT jacobmmcdougle predictorsofcrossfitopenperformance
AT nathanaelvelazquez predictorsofcrossfitopenperformance
AT michaeldroberts predictorsofcrossfitopenperformance
AT tiffanyaesmat predictorsofcrossfitopenperformance
AT trishaavandusseldorp predictorsofcrossfitopenperformance
AT yurifeito predictorsofcrossfitopenperformance
_version_ 1724672417888993280