Systematic review of the use of process evaluations in knowledge translation research
Abstract Background Experimental designs for evaluating knowledge translation (KT) interventions can provide strong estimates of effectiveness but offer limited insight into how the intervention worked. Consequently, process evaluations have been used to explore the causal mechanisms at work; howeve...
Main Authors: | Shannon D. Scott, Thomas Rotter, Rachel Flynn, Hannah M. Brooks, Tabatha Plesuk, Katherine H. Bannar-Martin, Thane Chambers, Lisa Hartling |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-019-1161-y |
Similar Items
-
How Single Is “Single” - Some Pragmatic Reflections on Single Versus Multifaceted Interventions to Facilitate Implementation; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multifaceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”
by: Ann Catrine Eldh, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01) -
Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions
by: Scott Shannon D, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01) -
A method to audit and score implementation of knowledge translation (KT) interventions in large health regions – an observational pilot study using rectal cancer surgery in Ontario
by: Marko Simunovic, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Bereavement care interventions: a systematic review
by: Feudtner Chris, et al.
Published: (2004-07-01) -
Supporting the implementation of stroke quality-based procedures (QBPs): a mixed methods evaluation to identify knowledge translation activities, knowledge translation interventions, and determinants of implementation across Ontario
by: Julia E. Moore, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)