Effects of model resolution on the interpretation of satellite NO₂ observations

• Main Authors: R. C. Cohen, R. C. Hudman, L. C. Valin, A. R. Russell
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2011-11-01
• Series: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
• Online Access: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/11647/2011/acp-11-11647-2011.pdf

Inference of NO_x emissions (NO+NO₂) from satellite observations of tropospheric NO₂ column requires knowledge of NO_x lifetime, usually provided by chemical transport models (CTMs). However, it is known that species subject to non-linear sources or sinks, such as ozone, are susceptible to biases in coarse-resolution CTMs. Here we compute the resolution-dependent bias in predicted NO₂ column, a quantity relevant to the interpretation of space-based observations. We use 1-D and 2-D models to illustrate the mechanisms responsible for these biases over a range of NO₂ concentrations and model resolutions. We find that predicted biases are largest at coarsest model resolutions with negative biases predicted over large sources and positive biases predicted over small sources. As an example, we use WRF-CHEM to illustrate the resolution necessary to predict 10 AM and 1 PM NO₂ column to 10 and 25% accuracy over three large sources, the Four Corners power plants in NW New Mexico, Los Angeles, and the San Joaquin Valley in California for a week-long simulation in July 2006. We find that resolution in the range of 4–12 km is sufficient to accurately model nonlinear effects in the NO₂ loss rate.